View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Charles in Charge Online / Charles in Charge links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / Charles in Charge Photo Gallery
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 14, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 148
|
Nicole Eggert is a lying piece of trash.
If this really happened, she would not have voluntarily consented to appear on his VH-1 hit celebreality tv series "SCOTT BAIO IS 45 AND SINGLE" just a few years afterwards. Why in the world would Nicole cheerfully seek to work with Scott again during her later adult years on "45 AND SINGLE" ?? If he was really abusing / molesting her as she allegedly claims now, she would have desperately wanted to stay away from him after the end of "Charles In Charge". But she did not. She clearly did no such thing. This does not make any logical sense at all. Whoever heard of a rape victim or victim of sexual molestation eagerly agreeing to participate later in the future TV show of her alleged assailant ?? Nobody except lying Nicole Eggert. Scott Baio has multiple documents and audio evidence to defend his innocence against her false allegations. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
certified wackball#3
Moderator
Forum Icon Join Date: Aug 03, 2003
Location: hiding under the third booth at Arnold's
Posts: 58,156
|
where is this so-called evidence Scott has? so far his "evidence" was to proclaim his innocence on a live broadcast and argued that he couldn't be lying because it was LIVE.
Nicole explained her appearance on his show - whether you agree with the logic behind it is moot and not evidence. Scott has already admitted to having a physical relationship with Nicole - but he now claims it all happened after CIC ended and they were no longer working together. If it happened earlier - when she was a young teenager - then even if the relationship was "consensual" it still would have been innappropriate (and statuatory rape). Why don't we wait and see what actual evidence is prevented instead of making judgements purely based on your political associations? If you want to argue about politics go to the politics board or some other website instead of trying to start an argument here. |
|
__________________
* GeeksToGo * AntiVir * Avast antivirus * Housecall Online * Sysinternals Security Utilities * * ZoneAlarm * Agnitum-firewall * Comodo Firewall * AVG Anti-Rootkit * RootkitRevealer * ParasiteCheck * * Annoyances * FreeCodecs * Mikes-Hosts-File * GRC.com * MSAntispyware * DVD's * TradeList * myspace * |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 14, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 148
|
Whoever heard of a rape victim or a victim of sexual molestation eagerly and voluntarily agreeing to participate later in the future TV show of her alleged assailant ??
Nobody except lying Nicole Eggert. The last post on this message board thread never satisfactorily answered this puzzling question. Now we have FURTHER DIRECT EVIDENCE that NICOLE EGGERT IS TRULY A LIAR, courtesy of TMZ : SCOTT BAIO'S CO-STAR JOSIE DAVIES DENIES NICOLE EGGERT'S SEXUAL ASSAULT CLAIMS AGAINST HIM Scott Baio is getting some reinforcement from former co-star Jose Davis over claims made by Nicole Eggert saying Scott forced Josie to remove her pants when she was just 13. Eggert was going back and forth with Baio fans on Twitter Wednesday and at one point said : "ASK SCOTT BAIO WHY HE DEMANDED JOSIE DAVIS PULL HER PANTS DOWN WHEN SHE WAS 13." Eggert later deleted the tweet but not before Davis got wind of it. Josie, who played Sarah Powell on "Charles In Charge", just came to Scott's defense and called the allegation completely false : "THE ALLEGATION THAT NICOLE EGGERT MADE ON TWITTER SAYING SCOTT BAIO WAS INAPPROPRIATE WITH ME IS COMPLETELY FALSE. I ONLY HAD A POSITIVE AND A PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM. OUT OF RESPECT FOR THOSE INVOLVED, I WILL NOT BE RESPONDING FURTHER ON THE MATTER." Scott's legal representative, Brian Glicklich, tells TMZ : "FROM THE BEGINNING, NICOLE EGGERT'S INCONSISTENT STORIES HAVE PROVEN HER CLAIMS TO BE UNTRUE. SHE HAS TRIPPED OVER HER WORDS AGAIN AND IT IS TIME TO RECOGNIZE THIS AS A CHARADE. SCOTT IS PROFOUNDLY GRATEFUL TO JOSIE DAVIS FOR HER INTEGRITY AND DECENCY." ( As of this writing, Nicole Eggert currently appears to be having a major meltdown on Twitter and is busy inexplicably attacking the Baio family's charity foundation for helping sick children. ) |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 124,388
|
Scott Baio won't be prosecuted for alleged sexual assault on Nicole Eggert based on statute of limitations
When the alleged Charles in Charge assaults took place in the 1980s, the statute of limitations was three years, which means it has long since run out, according to TMZ. Eggert says she expected the result, but adds that she wanted to lay the "groundwork" if any future accusations were made against Baio. |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
22 Years at Sitcoms Online
Forum Icon
Join Date: Jun 06, 2003
Location: Somewhere you're Not
Posts: 62,125
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
Sonny |
||
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 124,388
|
Quote:
He posted a podcast which states that Nicole Eggert had a boyfriend who used to come onto the set of Charles in Charge when she was younger. Who she ended up living with at around 16/17 and ran away to Vegas with to marry in 1990/1991 when she was 18/19 (I don't know the guy's name; he's not famous but he states his name and the marriage certificate). This means that within two years she went from this guy who she married in Vegas in 1991 to Scott Baio and then to Corey Haim in 1993. If anything, this pretty much kicks any credibility she has about sleeping with and losing her virginity to Scott at 17 as she was living with and sleeping with her then boyfriend at this time. Nicole had already cast doubt on herself when she was faced with her statements from that other podcast where she said she lost her virginity to Baio. She explained it away by saying she was lying then because she was putting on an act to make for good radio, but as soon as she was off the air she told the hosts the truth and how Baio abused her. She also stated at one point years ago that she and Corey Haim were together when they were underage but Corey Feldman pulled her on Twitter about that and stated that she "seems to have the timelines a bit blurred" as it was around Blown Away in 1993 when she and Corey Haim hooked up. |
|
|
Last edited by TMC; 01-29-2019 at 04:55 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 124,388
|
Scott Baio accuses Nicole Eggert of creating sexual misconduct allegations to relaunch her career
Baio reacted to the news that prosecutors declined to charge him over his fellow Charles in Charge co-star's sexual misconduct allegations because the statute of limitations had expired. "For the last several months, my advisors have conducted their own investigation, which is well documented and was presented to the police and District Attorney,” Baio said in a statement. “It showed that Nicole Eggert’s statements were part of a plan created long before her police report, with the intent of relaunching her own career. To reiterate: her false charges were conceived in advance for personal gain." |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 14, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 148
|
SCOTT BAIO GETS LETTER FROM DISTRICT ATTORNEY JACKIE LACEY OFFICIALLY REFUTING FAKE "CREDIBILITY" CLAIMS BY NICOLE EGGERT.
Scott Baio has finally been told in black and white that Nicole Eggert's fake claims of sexual assault by the actor were not believed to be "credible" by the District Attorney. Officials working for the Los Angeles County District Attorney have refuted actress Nicole Eggert's false claims that they found her accusations against Scott Baio "credible". In a letter to Baio's attorney from L. A. District Attorney Jackie Lacey through one of her deputy D.A.'s, it is made clear the only reason the Baio case was declined for prosecution was because the statute of limitations had expired and no other factors weighed on the decision. Prosecutors reviewed the case and shut it down last month citing the expiration of the statute of limitations at the time of the alleged incidents when victims had three years to report complaints to the police. Eggert falsely claimed that the D. A. had a hard time declining the case because she allegedly believed her story. However, lawmakers are now refuting her untrue claims insisting the statute of limitations was the only factor in their decision not to prosecute. The letter from District Attorney Jackie Lacey reads : "NO ONE FROM THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE HAS MADE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ABOUT THE CREDIBILITY OF ANYONE INTERVIEWED IN CONNECTION WITH THIS CASE." Scott Baio tells The Blast : "FIRST, NICOLE EGGERT CLAIMED IT WAS THE D. A. HERSELF WHO FOUND EGGERT'S STORY CREDIBLE. AFTER RELEASING JACKIE LACEY'S LETTER TODAY PROVING THAT FALSE, NICOLE EGGERT HAS CHANGED HER STORY AGAIN AND NOW REFUSES TO NAME HER SO-CALLED ( IMAGINARY ) SOURCE. NICOLE EGGERT HAS BEEN CAUGHT ( LYING ) ONE TIME AFTER ANOTHER. SHE CAN'T BE TRUSTED AND SHE CAN'T BE BELIEVED." Baio believes Eggert failed at her quest to destroy his reputation. He is planning on pursuing legal action to sue her. ( The Blast and Hollywood.com ) |
|
Last edited by thebabymysweet; 07-26-2018 at 01:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 14, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 148
|
SCOTT BAIO'S FIERCE PUBLIC STATEMENT AFTER THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
REJECTED LYING NICOLE EGGERT'S FAKE SEXUAL MOLESTATION ACCUSATIONS : "NICOLE EGGERT dedicated herself to destroying my reputation and harming my family. She has FAILED. The Los Angeles DISTRICT ATTORNEY's conclusion to their INVESTIGATION OF HER EVER CHANGING STORIES marks THE END of a sad chapter. Along the way, NICOLE EGGERT HAS DEFAMED AND HARASSED MY FAMILY, FRIENDS, MY WIFE'S CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, THE FAMILIES OF THE CHILDREN WHOM THE FOUNDATION HELPS, AND MANY OTHERS. It is hard to imagine anyone taking her seriously again. For the last several months, MY ADVISERS HAVE CONDUCTED THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION, which is WELL DOCUMENTED and was PRESENTED TO THE POLICE AND THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY. It shows that NICOLE EGGERT'S STATEMENTS WERE PART OF A PLAN, created long before her police report, WITH THE INTENT OF RELAUNCHING HER OWN CAREER. To reiterate : NICOLE EGGERT'S FALSE CHARGES WERE CONCEIVED IN ADVANCE FOR PERSONAL GAIN. We also presented MULTIPLE WITNESS STATEMENTS who knew Nicole Eggert at the time the show ( CHARLES-IN-CHARGE ) was made and PRESENTED AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PORTRAIT OF HER BEHAVIOR AND MOTIVATIONS FOR HER FALSE CHARGES against me. Unlike Nicole Eggert, most claims of sexual assault and harassment are honest. And my heart goes out to those who have been harmed. As bad as NICOLE EGGERT'S actions against me were, she has hurt them even more if they are doubted for even one moment because of her UNTRUE ALLEGATIONS. I hope that does not happen and I will do my best to support them." |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 14, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 148
|
SCOTT BAIO'S PRESS CONFERENCE , Part I ( August 2, 2018 ) :
"Somebody I worked with named NICOLE EGGERT STARTED A CAMPAIGN TO HARM not just ME but MY ENTIRE FAMILY, MY FRIENDS AND ANYONE WHO OPPOSES HER. She has done it by CONSPIRING IN AN ORGANIZED AND ENDLESS CAMPAIGN that has EXCEEDED ALL BOUNDARIES OF THE WAY DECENT PEOPLE BEHAVE toward each other. She calls me a rapist and a child molester almost daily to every and any audience she can find. FOR MONTHS, WE HAVE PROVEN HER STORY TO BE 100 % FALSE BY SHOWING ONE INCONSISTENCY AFTER ANOTHER. WE ALSO HAVE SIGNIFICANT NEW INFORMATION BASED ON MULTIPLE WITNESS ACCOUNTS WE HAVE GATHERED OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS AND LOOK FORWARD TO SHARING IT. But it has not been enough to stop her. If anything, IT MADE HER ANGRIER. She has added to her campaign MY WIFE WHOM SHE SMEARS RELENTLESSLY, including CALLING HER BRAIN TUMORS IMAGINARY, THE FOUNDATION SHE OPERATES A SHAM, and THE DEADLY DISEASE it seeks to cure A FAKE. NICOLE EGGERT HAS MOCKED THE TRAGIC LOSS OF OUR UNBORN CHILD. AND SHE HAS THE NERVE TO ATTACK OUR DAUGHTER WHOM SHE PUBLICLY WARNS TO BE CAREFUL AROUND ME. I AM AT A LOSS FOR WORDS TO DESCRIBE THE UNRELENTING PAIN THIS HAS CAUSED ME AND MY FAMILY. For months, HER CLAIMS about me HAVE CHANGED OVER AND OVER and become LESS BELIEVABLE EVERY TIME. We have pointed out HER INCONSISTENCIES AND INACCURACIES as they have occurred but no one has put THE PUZZLE PIECES OF HER BEHAVIOR together. Anyone who looks at HER BEHAVIOR with a little care can see that IT IS NOT THE PRODUCT OF A REAL COMPLAINT but A PERSON WHO HAS FIXATED ON ME AND MY FAMILY TO HARM US. NICOLE EGGERT STARTED THIS HARASSMENT CAMPAIGN MONTHS BEFORE SHE FILED A FALSE POLICE REPORT IN AN ATTEMPT TO SHAME ME BEFORE ANY EVIDENCE WAS EXAMINED. SHE HAS FAILED and we are sending out a message about her that I very much hope everyone hears. Now TO END ANY DOUBT ABOUT HER FALSE CLAIMS, I am announcing today that I HAVE TAKEN FIVE ( 5 ) SEPARATE POLYGRAPH TESTS GIVEN BY TWO ( 2 ) HIGHLY RENOWNED EXAMINERS." BRIAN GLICKLICH : "He tested as being TRUTHFUL when he answered no to each of the questions. Again FIVE SEPARATE TESTS. TWO DIFFERENT EXAMINERS. 100 % TRUTHFUL. And 100 % OF ALL TESTS he took. THIS ELIMINATES ANY REMAINING DOUBT THAT NICOLE EGGERT'S CLAIMS ABOUT SCOTT BAIO ARE FALSE." |
|
Last edited by thebabymysweet; 09-17-2018 at 12:42 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
22 Years On Sitcoms
Moderator
Forum Legend Join Date: Aug 13, 2003
Location: Indy
Posts: 44,168
|
He ought to file some kind of counter-claim, defamation, or something like that. Get all the evidence out into a court, and try to clear his name that way.
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 14, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 148
|
SCOTT BAIO'S PRESS CONFERENCE , Part II ( August 2, 2018 ) :
"Since NICOLE EGGERT CONTINUES TO MISSTATE THE CONTENTS OF HER OWN SO-CALLED WITNESS STATEMENTS ( which are anything but ), I am going to share with you and the police today SOME OF WHAT OUR INVESTIGATORS HAVE DISCOVERED WHEN THEY LOOKED INTO HER PAST at the time Charles-In-Charge was filmed and beyond. As we have been subjected to THE BARRAGE OF FALSE CLAIMS AND SMEARS FROM NICOLE EGGERT AND THOSE WHO CONSPIRE WITH HER, my thoughts have turned to how lucky I am despite what she has attempted. I HAVE THE RESOURCES TO FIGHT HER THOUGH I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO. I can call on you and talk to you. And you're good enough to listen. MOST PEOPLE WHO HAVE CHILDREN BULLIED ON SOCIAL MEDIA DON'T HAVE THESE OPTIONS. NOR DO ADULTS WHO ARE ATTACKED BY ANONYMOUS COWARDS WHO WANT TO DESTROY THEIR LIVES. THIS IS A CRIMINAL QUESTION THAT NEEDS MORE THOUGHT. And I am thinking more and more about how I can help participate in better answers to this as we put the Nicole Eggert matter to a conclusion. Just one more point. NICOLE EGGERT'S FALSEHOODS BELONG ONLY TO HER. For most women who report unwanted sexual advances or assault, it is the beginning of a healing process that I support and applaud. I DO NOT WANT TODAY TO BE MISINTERPRETED AS AN INDICTMENT OF ANYONE EXCEPT NICOLE EGGERT AND HER CO-CONSPIRATORS. And I appreciate your help in making that clear." |
|
Last edited by thebabymysweet; 09-24-2018 at 01:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 14, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 148
|
SCOTT BAIO'S PRESS CONFERENCE , Part III ( August 2, 2018 ) :
"Why did I go to THE POLICE ? Because there is NO OTHER RECOURSE for me. There is NOTHING LEGAL for me to do. There is NOTHING PROTECTING SOMEBODY WHO'S FALSELY ACCUSED. NOTHING. Somebody can ACCUSE you. Somebody can MAKE SOMETHING UP. And it's O.K. And GOODBYE. The person who does the accusing is all sympathetic. And the person who's being accused is the devil. That should not be allowed. I HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG. AND THIS PERSON ( Nicole Eggert ) HAS A FIXATION. SO I WENT TO THE POLICE BECAUSE I WANT THIS TO END. IT'S OVER. EVIDENCE THIS HIGH. FIVE POLYGRAPHS. IT'S OVER. Hopefully with all this information that we have provided, the fact that the police never talked to me, I'm assuming BECAUSE OF THE MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE that we gave them with the polygraphs, that IT IS OVER. WHAT ELSE CAN SHE ( Nicole Eggert ) SAY ?? POLYGRAPHS AND EVIDENCE. SHE GOT CAUGHT 50 DIFFERENT WAYS NOT TELLING THE TRUTH. UNLESS SHE WANTS TO FABRICATE SOMETHING ELSE I DIDN'T DO. I could only guess what HER REAL MOTIVES are IN LYING. NOTORIETY. MONEY. Maybe SHE WANTED ME TO PAY HER OFF at some point. I don't know. There is NO COMING BACK from what she did. NO. You say anything you want about me. BUT YOU CANNOT COME AFTER MY WIFE AND MY KID. YOU CAN'T DO THAT." BRIAN GLICKLICH : "Every bit of NICOLE EGGERT'S STORY was UNDERMINED BY HER OWN DECEPTION. Every CLAIM SHE MADE was DISPROVEN. Scott Baio passed FIVE POLYGRAPH TESTS. Her FALSE CLAIMS UNDERMINE the hopes of MANY WOMEN who were TRULY ABUSED. NICOLE EGGERT IS SHAMELESS." |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 14, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 148
|
"NICOLE EGGERT will say and do anything to perpetuate HER FAKE #METOO STORY,
even after SCOTT BAIO REFUTED ALL HER LIES WITH SOLID EVIDENCE. She has NO ONE TO BLAME BUT HERSELF for THE PUBLIC TURNING THEIR BACKS to her. HER GLORY DAYS are long past, NEVER TO RETURN." ( Allegiance2theFlag : October 15, 2018 ) |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 14, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 148
|
"Yet, we have NEVER SEEN EVIDENCE OF NICOLE EGGERT'S
ALLEGED 'WITNESSES', THEIR NAMES OR WHAT THEY SAID. She also NEVER POSTED THE UNEDITED POLICE REPORTS she falsely claims to have." ( Brian Glicklich : October 4, 2018 ) "Gee, I must have missed THOSE 'NUMEROUS' TESTIMONIES. I'm guessing they were IMAGINARY." ( Democrat Teddy : October 6, 2018 ) "Are we back to THOSE MAGICAL INVISIBLE POLICE REPORTS again? What wasn't invisible was THE CEASE-AND-DESIST LETTER THAT JOSIE DAVIS'S ATTORNEY SENT TO NICOLE EGGERT for telling these lies." ( Brian Glicklich : October 15, 2018 ) |
|
|
![]() |
|
|