View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
The Brady Bunch (Sitcoms Online) / The Brady Bunch links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / The Brady Bunch Photo Gallery / The Brady Bunch - Fan Fiction Board
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 125,450
|
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 29, 2021
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,900
|
I never thought they got any. Shows that came out at that age never envisioned cable TV and syndications. Contracts rarely specified residuals for children on a show that was not that popular during its initial run.
When Jean Stapleton left All In The Family syndication was becoming popular. She signed away all of her rights and residuals of the show for $75,000. That money in 1979 was good coin but a drop in the bucket compared to what was yet to come over the next decade with VHRs, DVDs, and lifelong syndication on many cable TV channels. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jan 21, 2007
Posts: 479
|
Gettng paid for residuals at the time were not as generously paid as they are today. If I remember correctly, I think they got paid small residuals for a very limited number of runs, when first syndicated, unless I am thinking of some other show or different actors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 29, 2021
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,900
|
I have heard the cast say they dont make a dime off the show in reruns. Maybe they did for the first year or something. I think they were paid $400 per episode so even if it was for one year, its not very much. However the show has such interest over the past 50 years that each cast member is quite wealthy or a millionaire with Brady related shows, merchandise or creating their own business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 10, 2005
Posts: 809
|
A lot of it depends on your contract and what that says about reruns etc. And back then, nobody knew that a low rating show like this would be a touchstone for so many people 50 years in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Jan 18, 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,804
|
It's basically all spelled out in contracts. The producers pretty much have all the power regarding residuals, so there probably not a lot of actors or actresses from that time that had long term residual deals... maybe the really big names could negotiate for it, but kids certainly didn't have much (if any) bargaining power for residuals.
|
|
__________________
Straight, and VERY proud of it. No, that's OK, I don't need a parade. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 10, 2005
Posts: 691
|
They were probably just happy to get work and would sign anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 29, 2021
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,900
|
If they were paid $400 per episode and they appeared in about 20 episodes per year (each kid was not to appear in 2 episodes per season to save money), that would put their yearly salary about $8,000 per year. In 1970 the average salary in the USA was $7,600. The medium household income was $8,700.
They were not rich like people are today on sitcoms but they were paid a salary that could support their family if needed. They did some concerts, cartoon, and albums that definitely boosted their yearly salary back then. Even if they did get residuals it would be chump change because by today's standards it was not much money. $8,000 in 1970 is like making $41,000 today. I once saw an interview with Sherwood Schwartz about the low pay of his sitcoms. He said the network gave them little money and a contract is a contract. Whether the show is horrible in ratings or it becomes the post popular show on tv. Everyone should stand behind their contract and what they agreed to be paid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Aug 24, 2013
Posts: 466
|
They aren’t kids anymore.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|