View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 126,010
|
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/on...f-breaking-bad
"Better Call Saul's air of proleptic regret may be the best measure of what its creators learned from Breaking Bad," says Aaron Bady of co-creators Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould's approach to the Saul Goodman spinoff, pointing out how the Kim Wexler character appears to be a direct response to the Skyler White hate on Breaking Bad. "The original show was ostensibly about transformation, as it reminded us through heavy-handed shots of chemistry paraphernalia and more than a few on-the-nose soliloquies," says Bady. "But the revelation of the final season was that Walter had never really changed at all." Bady notes the unease that Gilligan and Gould had with many fans identifying with Walter White -- and against Skyler-- adding that Breaking Bad's "narrative could never overpower the allure of its protagonist. No matter how ugly Walt’s victories became, the show’s pleasure was always, at least a little bit, about living vicariously through his violent triumphs and awful freedoms. If he was a time bomb, we watched to see the fireworks. Better Call Saul has turned this formula on its head. We know that Jimmy McGill really will change and that, far from being Jimmy’s authentic self, Saul Goodman is his negation: to become Saul, Jimmy must effectively perish." That's why, says Bady, "Better Call Saul does not seem interested in giving its fans an ending that they can thrill to. All I feel for Jimmy is dread." ALSO:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|