Why is the NFL so protective of the use of the term "Super Bowl"? - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

TMC · 02-13-2022, 01:38 AM

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...wl-super-bowl/

To avoid shelling out money to the NFL, advertisers and other groups that could face legal consequences refer to the Super Bowl as "the Big Game" -- which the NFL tried and failed to trademark in 2007. It is, says Philip Bump, "a hackneyed aspect of the Super Bowl that I’ve always found interesting: the NFL’s hyperactive protection of the term 'Super Bowl' itself. This game makes everyone involved an outrageous amount of money, and so the league runs a Stasi-level policing effort to ensure that the people who are allowed to use 'Super Bowl' are the only people who use 'Super Bowl.'" Bump adds: "At its heart, the question is money. If the NFL thinks that your use of 'Super Bowl' infringes on the financial agreements it has in place or on its potential to affect future lucrative agreements, you will have a process server on your doorstep before you finish typing 'SUPER.' The word 'thinks' is the crux of that sentence; as noted, the league takes an expansive view of this. Churches charging a fundraising fee for a Super Bowl party, for example, is a slippery slope toward … uh … something that affects the bottom line, apparently. Someone filing for a trademark for a charity bowling event — 'Superbowling Spectacular' — faced opposition from the league because step one is you raise money for nonprofits with a bowl-a-thon, step two is [??], and step three is the NFL goes bankrupt. It’s almost too obvious." Still, the NFL is unlikely to sue. As trademark lawyer Mitchell Stabb, who writes an annual explainer on Super Bowl trademark, notes, the NFL wants to create the perception that it will vigorously protect its trademark rights. “Does the NFL sue that often? No,” Stabbe says. “But who wants to run that risk?”

ALSO:

Mike Tirico traveled 12,000 miles this week -- from Beijing to Tokyo to Connecticut to Los Angeles -- to cover the Super Bowl for NBC: “Being able to host the Super Bowl and host the Olympics in the same day is...” Tirico said in an interview, trailing off. “(It’s) not even a dream because I’m not silly enough to dream that big.”
Last September, CBS Sports became the first media outlet to publish a "When does Super Bowl LVI? start"-style article
Go behind the scenes of the Super Bowl LVI flyover
Why bettors are using a fake Simpsons meme to bet on the Bengals beating the Rams, 34-31

02-13-2022, 01:38 AM	#1
TMC Member Forum Idol Join Date: Jan 09, 2001 Posts: 127,191	Why is the NFL so protective of the use of the term "Super Bowl"? https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...wl-super-bowl/ To avoid shelling out money to the NFL, advertisers and other groups that could face legal consequences refer to the Super Bowl as "the Big Game" -- which the NFL tried and failed to trademark in 2007. It is, says Philip Bump, "a hackneyed aspect of the Super Bowl that I’ve always found interesting: the NFL’s hyperactive protection of the term 'Super Bowl' itself. This game makes everyone involved an outrageous amount of money, and so the league runs a Stasi-level policing effort to ensure that the people who are allowed to use 'Super Bowl' are the only people who use 'Super Bowl.'" Bump adds: "At its heart, the question is money. If the NFL thinks that your use of 'Super Bowl' infringes on the financial agreements it has in place or on its potential to affect future lucrative agreements, you will have a process server on your doorstep before you finish typing 'SUPER.' The word 'thinks' is the crux of that sentence; as noted, the league takes an expansive view of this. Churches charging a fundraising fee for a Super Bowl party, for example, is a slippery slope toward … uh … something that affects the bottom line, apparently. Someone filing for a trademark for a charity bowling event — 'Superbowling Spectacular' — faced opposition from the league because step one is you raise money for nonprofits with a bowl-a-thon, step two is [??], and step three is the NFL goes bankrupt. It’s almost too obvious." Still, the NFL is unlikely to sue. As trademark lawyer Mitchell Stabb, who writes an annual explainer on Super Bowl trademark, notes, the NFL wants to create the perception that it will vigorously protect its trademark rights. “Does the NFL sue that often? No,” Stabbe says. “But who wants to run that risk?” ALSO: Mike Tirico traveled 12,000 miles this week -- from Beijing to Tokyo to Connecticut to Los Angeles -- to cover the Super Bowl for NBC: “Being able to host the Super Bowl and host the Olympics in the same day is...” Tirico said in an interview, trailing off. “(It’s) not even a dream because I’m not silly enough to dream that big.” Last September, CBS Sports became the first media outlet to publish a "When does Super Bowl LVI? start"-style article Go behind the scenes of the Super Bowl LVI flyover Why bettors are using a fake Simpsons meme to bet on the Bengals beating the Rams, 34-31