View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 124,387
|
My guess is that the actors wanted to have their cake and eat it too. In other words, they want the “benefits” of having a reboot without actually doing a reboot and obviously it’s not working. The producers assumed (with this “play within a play” concept) that people care so much about the personal lives of these actors when really they just want some closure on the characters. This doesn’t feel at all like a reboot. As I just said, people just want to know what happened to the characters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
22 Years at Sitcoms Online
Forum Icon
Join Date: Jun 06, 2003
Location: Somewhere you're Not
Posts: 62,125
|
Yep. I've been reading some comments on FB and most people thought it was going to be a true reboot. Ratings would have been great if that was the case.
|
|
__________________
Sonny |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 124,387
|
Quote:
Come to think of it, remember that WB show Grosse Pointe (which was based on Darren Starr's experiences working behind the scenes on 90210), which arguably did a better job with other actors apparently spoofing the real life actors and their characters? Joe E. Tata and Jason Priestly even guest stared in case people did not understand the connection. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|