View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Family Ties Online / Family Ties links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / Family Ties Photo Gallery / Family Ties - Fan Fiction Board
![]() Buy Family Ties - The Complete Series on DVD |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 126,314
|
What types of roles do you think he would portray?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Keep Calm and Love Snoopy
Forum Star
Join Date: Jul 13, 2008
Location: Lynnwood, Washington
Posts: 15,697
|
He's still a wonderful actor and has had some great roles. It's sad that he can't do as much as he used to but he's always been one of my favorites and I admire him so much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 16, 2002
Location: Keaton residence
Posts: 10,214
|
I definitely think he would still be an A-list actor if he had not been diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease. He had many great movies over the years in addition to his best role (imo) on Family Ties ]tv show]. While the Parkinson's has slowed him down, he still acts. It's sometimes hard to watch him in interviews because he really struggles with the effects of Parkinson's Disease. Parkinson's didn't make him an A-list actor. He already was.
|
|
__________________
Jenny |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Oct 19, 2016
Posts: 6,001
|
No offense to Ed Norton (who was great in the role), but I can honestly see MJF playing Woody Harrison's lawyer in The People Vs. Larry Flynt. An iconic role in an iconic movie imho.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Forum Star
Join Date: Oct 23, 2015
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 17,222
|
Of Course, Michael would've continued acting full time if the Parkinson does not affecting him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 19, 2018
Location: The Show Me state
Posts: 2,966
|
Michael J. Fox has to be the luckiest actor in America! What other 5'4" male actor had a blockbuster movie trilogy AND a top 5 TV show in their career??
He has to be the ONLY one! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: May 02, 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 366
|
Quote:
Looking back, Fox was only an A-list actor from 1985-91. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 19, 2018
Location: The Show Me state
Posts: 2,966
|
Quote:
Plus how far can being a 5'4" actor really take you?? Has there EVER been an A list male actor only 5'4" in modern times?? Can't think of any. Even Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, and Rock Hudson were taller than that! As were almost all Golden age Hollywood male actors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 126,314
|
Quote:
Also many of Michael's key characters like Alex P. Keaton and Marty McFly and onscreen persona were so inextricably linked to the 1980s zeitgeist. He pretty much carved out the niche of being an on-the-make yuppie (especially in films like The Secret of My Success and Doc Hollywood). I suspect that going into the '90s he wasn’t exactly bringing in the box office numbers anymore (especially once the Back to the Future trilogy came to a conclusion). Casualties of War and The Hard Way were supposed to be hits. Unfortunately, the former bombed and the latter, although successful, woefully underperformed. And then the films that he did which were successful beyond the ones mentioned above (such as Doc Hollywood, Life With Mikey, etc.) weren’t very successful on their own terms. The Frighteners was really his last chance to be a major star and it performed poorly. Although it’s now a considered a cult classic, it barely earned its budget back. Plus (and it really pains me to say this), Michael J. Fox when you get right down to it, was going to have trouble as a leading man anyway without his health issues. He was too short and too likable to be credible as an action star, he didn’t do the successful pairings that might have been able to revive his box office, and he was never a romantic lead. What I mean is that Michael J. Fox you can argue, was already a very specific type of character actor. This goes back to my comment in regards to how his key characters and persona were perhaps, too inextricably linked to the 1980s zeitgeist. I just don't know if Michael processed the versatility of Tom Hanks (who also first gained noticed as a TV star of a comedy series in the early '80s) to broaden his scope of film-work. Michael J. Fox was a baby faced star from the '80s and usually those don’t age or connect to new audiences very well. |
|
|
Last edited by TMC; 11-18-2020 at 04:44 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 19, 2018
Location: The Show Me state
Posts: 2,966
|
Thanks for the frank comments TMC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Dec 24, 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,811
|
Yes.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|