Was 'Batman' Too Campy For Its Own Good? - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Brian Damage · 09-01-2010, 11:22 PM

Did it rise and falter too quickly due to the fact it was perhaps too campy or is that what made the series so special?

Mr. Television · 09-01-2010, 11:36 PM

I think that's what made the show special . I remember watching it when I was a kid. I would eagerly wait until the next day to find out who the villian was going to be. lol And I think Batman's seriousness and Robin's terrible puns were part of the charm. I thought the first 2 seasons were great. The last season wasn't though. When they added Batgirl and only had one show a week and didn't end on a cliffhanger anymore, it wasn't the same. And then they replaced Julie Newmar as Catwoman with Eartha Kitt. What were they thinking?

hno:

MickeyMac · 09-03-2010, 03:45 PM

THIS IS THE ONLY BATMAN WORTH WATCHING.

Forget any of the movies or whatever that came after this. They cant hold a candle to 1960's Batman. It was fun, hip full of action, colorful characters and it was good. Interestingly enough ABC cancelled Shindig to make room for Batman.

Retro4Life · 09-03-2010, 06:03 PM

I think it was what it was supposed to be and of course that's why it was so wildly successful. On the other hand, it does seem like it would have been hard to sustain something like that, because the novelty of it was a great part of the appeal and once that wore off they were bound to be in trouble. I know that people often blame the introduction of Batgirl, the half hour episodes, and the network for the fall of Batman but really I think even with great writing and production values the show probably wouldn't have gone much more than five years or so.

And just for the record, Batgirl was the the best thing ABOUT that third year.

TMC · 02-12-2011, 04:07 AM

Actually, the first season for the most part (thanks to Lorenzo Semple, Jr.) had a good balance of of seriousness and campy (but in a clever manner). By the second season (with people like Charles Hoffman and Stanford Sherman writing more often), the show seemed to become too self-aware and amped up the camp value. By the third season, the series had more or less become a sad parody of itself, satirizing not only comic books of the day but trends.

king of comedy · 03-03-2013, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MickeyMac

THIS IS THE ONLY BATMAN WORTH WATCHING.

Forget any of the movies or whatever that came after this. They cant hold a candle to 1960's Batman. It was fun, hip full of action, colorful characters and it was good. Interestingly enough ABC cancelled Shindig to make room for Batman.

I'll take the Chris Nolan movies over this. It fitted its' time but it has'nt aged well. Dated and painful today. The animated series is way better.

Mr. Television · 03-03-2013, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Retro4Life

I think it was what it was supposed to be and of course that's why it was so wildly successful. On the other hand, it does seem like it would have been hard to sustain something like that, because the novelty of it was a great part of the appeal and once that wore off they were bound to be in trouble. I know that people often blame the introduction of Batgirl, the half hour episodes, and the network for the fall of Batman but really I think even with great writing and production values the show probably wouldn't have gone much more than five years or so.

And just for the record, Batgirl was the the best thing ABOUT that third year.

Well the good thing is that it had 120 episodes thanks to airing twice in 1966-1967 so when you watch in syndication it's like it aired for 5 seasons. lol

Prince Michael · 03-19-2014, 02:49 AM

I never had a chance to see the Batman TV series, but a friend of mine did . I watched the 1966 Batman movie at his house, and he said "It's too bad Batman was cancelled after it's third season, because that's when Batgirl appeared and the Batboat, so as soon as they got those elements in place, it was cancelled !" .

09-01-2010, 11:22 PM	#1
Brian Damage I'm Rich Bitch Forum Icon Join Date: Feb 03, 2002 Location: What Ain't No Country I Ever Heard Of...They Speak English in What? Posts: 63,107	Was 'Batman' Too Campy For Its Own Good? Did it rise and falter too quickly due to the fact it was perhaps too campy or is that what made the series so special? Attached Images
	__________________ The Key to the Kingdom of Heaven: John 3:3 *Money Doesn't Buy Happiness...But I'd Rather Cry in My Private Jet*

09-01-2010, 11:36 PM	#2
Mr. Television 23 Years at Sitcoms Online Forum Icon Join Date: Jun 06, 2003 Location: Somewhere you're Not Posts: 62,132	I think that's what made the show special . I remember watching it when I was a kid. I would eagerly wait until the next day to find out who the villian was going to be. lol And I think Batman's seriousness and Robin's terrible puns were part of the charm. I thought the first 2 seasons were great. The last season wasn't though. When they added Batgirl and only had one show a week and didn't end on a cliffhanger anymore, it wasn't the same. And then they replaced Julie Newmar as Catwoman with Eartha Kitt. What were they thinking? hno:
	__________________ Sonny

09-03-2010, 06:03 PM	#4
Retro4Life Accept No Substitutes Forum Veteran Join Date: Feb 04, 2009 Location: IL Posts: 6,708	I think it was what it was supposed to be and of course that's why it was so wildly successful. On the other hand, it does seem like it would have been hard to sustain something like that, because the novelty of it was a great part of the appeal and once that wore off they were bound to be in trouble. I know that people often blame the introduction of Batgirl, the half hour episodes, and the network for the fall of Batman but really I think even with great writing and production values the show probably wouldn't have gone much more than five years or so. And just for the record, Batgirl was the the best thing ABOUT that third year.
	__________________ Alex Reiger :[Trying to convince Louie not to antagonize Bobby] "It's not hard to make people feel bad about their lives. What's hard is making people feel good about their lives."

02-12-2011, 04:07 AM	#5
TMC Member Forum Idol Join Date: Jan 09, 2001 Posts: 126,743	Actually, the first season for the most part (thanks to Lorenzo Semple, Jr.) had a good balance of of seriousness and campy (but in a clever manner). By the second season (with people like Charles Hoffman and Stanford Sherman writing more often), the show seemed to become too self-aware and amped up the camp value. By the third season, the series had more or less become a sad parody of itself, satirizing not only comic books of the day but trends.
	Last edited by TMC; 03-04-2011 at 10:17 PM.

09-03-2010, 03:45 PM	#3
MickeyMac Member Forum Star Join Date: Jun 18, 2008 Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan Posts: 19,008	THIS IS THE ONLY BATMAN WORTH WATCHING. Forget any of the movies or whatever that came after this. They cant hold a candle to 1960's Batman. It was fun, hip full of action, colorful characters and it was good. Interestingly enough ABC cancelled Shindig to make room for Batman.

03-19-2014, 02:49 AM	#8
Prince Michael Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jun 26, 2011 Location: Helena, Montana Posts: 296	I never had a chance to see the Batman TV series, but a friend of mine did . I watched the 1966 Batman movie at his house, and he said "It's too bad Batman was cancelled after it's third season, because that's when Batgirl appeared and the Batboat, so as soon as they got those elements in place, it was cancelled !" .