View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Chit Chat - Main Board / Games / Movies / Music / Sports / Video Games / Chit Chat - Classic / View Latest Threads in All Chit Chat Boards
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 126,449
|
http://canoe.ca/JamMovies/mar20_couples-sun.html
Hollywood's cursed couples By LOUIS B. HOBSON and KEVIN WILLIAMSON Calgary Sun The Gigli Curse has some people in Hollywood quivering in their shoes, while others are stomping their feet. After what happened with Gigli last year, the current wisdom in Tinseltown is not to cast real-life couples as on-screen couples. The Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez pairing in the romantic comedy Gigli drew some of 2003's most scathing reviews as well as a knee-jerk reaction at the box-office. And it wasn't just in North America. The $75-million US comedy made a paltry $6 million in North America, an anemic $1.2 million in foreign markets and is struggling to find an audience even on DVD. The film's implosion is blamed on the hype that surrounded the real-life romance of its stars. At first, people couldn't get enough of Affleck and Lopez from the expensive gifts they lavished on each other to their spats and reconciliations. By the time Gigli came out, Affleck and Lopez had reached public saturation. It was not the first time a superstar romance upstaged the artists' films. Think 1962 and Cleopatra. This historical epic teamed Elizabeth Taylor, Hollywood's reigning sex siren, with Richard Burton, one of Britain's most revered classical actors. Within weeks of arriving on the set of Cleopatra, Taylor and Burton had a steamier affair than the lovers they were portraying. Their very public private antics were blamed for the flick's dismal box office, but that didn't stop studios from building future films around them. In the space of five years, Burton and Taylor made seven more films together. Even when critics praised their work in Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? and The Taming of the Shrew they would also suggest it was like watching the Burton's home movies. Memories of these casting fiascos has Kevin Smith just a little worried over the release Friday of his romantic comedy Jersey Girl. It's the movie Affleck and Lopez did immediately after they'd fallen in love on the set of Gigli. "We considered it a real coup that Jennifer agreed to do a cameo in Jersey Girl and it was because she and Ben were so much in love that she agreed to do it. "Now it looks as if we're not so lucky," admits Smith. Kirsten Dunst says she and her boyfriend Jake Gyllenhaal "would love to work together... It's other people who seem to have problems with us working together. Gigli ruined it for us." Dunst was disappointed that Cameron Crowe wouldn't even consider letting Gyllenhaal play her love interest in Elizabethtown which shoots later this year. "Jake and I could totally do it, but after what happened with Gigli no one's willing to consider pairing us..." Michael Douglas, who is married to Catherine Zeta-Jones, says the trick for married actors "is not to play lovers. "Catherine and I are looking for projects we can do together in which we aren't playing an on-screen couple." Douglas and Zeta-Jones were both in Traffic, but Douglas says that's not quite what they're looking for either. "Traffic was essentially three little movies that got woven together, so it wasn't even like Catherine and I were in the same film." Reese Witherspoon and her husband Ryan Phillippe starred together in Cruel Intentions. Though it was a rewarding experience, Witherspoon says they turned down subsequent offers to work together: "I don't think audiences want to see real-life couples playing screen couples. It blurs the whole reality and fantasy thing that movies are supposed to be all about." Jennifer Aniston agrees. She says a big-screen pairing of her with hubby Brad Pitt "is not likely to happen. I just don't think it's a good idea for us to play screen lovers. It's not that we couldn't do it. It's just that we shouldn't." Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 28, 2003
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 14,803
|
I don't see the point in couples not working together over Gigli.
What about Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward? What about Lucy and Desi? What about Courteney Cox and David Arquette? not everytime a couple does a movie or tv show together, it stiffs. Gigli flopped because people began to realize what a subpar actress Jennifer Lopez really is (and like I said on another board, if she wasn't a movie star when she decided to conquer music, she would've been a prime contender for WB's Superstar USA), and Ben Affleck had been in bad movie after bad movie, so people had their fill of the couple |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
BestYearsofOurLives
Forum Veteran
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 2,150
|
I don't think couple's in Hollywood should be put off doing movies together- they just should be careful picking the films they do. Some new couples pick films, and you can just see it in the film that they're still blinded by love for each other, which makes for pretty sappy on-screen chemistry. I also believe that they shouldn't play lovers- in the sense of doing a love scene in a film. Lucy and Desi probably worked because they were both funny people, and worked well together.
Dunst and Gyllenhaal would probably work well together- I remember though a while ago Dunst said she didn't think Spiderman 2 would've been as good had she and Jake (this was when Tobey was almost replaced) worked on it together. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Forum Superstar
Join Date: Dec 16, 2001
Posts: 30,406
|
aw man i was hoping this would involve death curses like in poulterguihoweverthehellyouspellit.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|