View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Idol
Join Date: Jan 09, 2001
Posts: 124,391
|
...about middle age
https://www.washingtonpost.com/enter...e39_story.html Fox's Beverly Hills, 90210 revival is engineered "in a way that lessens the burden of full commitment — theirs or ours," says Hank Stuever. He says BH90210 manages to both be light and cynical while giving its cast -- who now range in age from 46 to 58 -- a chance to "play exaggerated versions of themselves — which is to say, actors who happened to hit it big on an enjoyably mediocre TV series three decades ago and have had to cope with that fact ever since," while also riffing on their celebrity personas and post-90210 epilogues. "The first episode, in fact, verges on one of the smartest portrayals of midlife ennui we’re likely to see this year, save for FX’s Better Things and the belatedly satisfying final season of HBO’s Divorce," says Stuever. "Even if none of the 90210 actors spend their nights on a park bench (fictionally or otherwise), a viewer can at least take a moment to appreciate that their career trajectories aren’t quite what they once imagined." He adds: "BH90210 easily locates a tone of self-mockery; if it could somehow remain in the slightly dour, don’t-remind-me mood of this first episode, it might get to a deeper, more profound place than it ever intended: a meta-commentary on fame, age and nostalgia. Instead, shenanigans break out, the dialogue heads for the ham (to go with the cheese), and the gang winds up spending a night in jail." ALSO:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|