View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Three's Company (Sitcoms Online) / PB's Three's Company Page: Jack's Bistro / Three's Company links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / Three's Company Photo Gallery / Three's Company - Fan Fiction Board
The Ropers Message Board / Three's a Crowd Message Board
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 1 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 2 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 3 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 4 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 5 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 6 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 7 on DVD |
![]() Buy Three's Company - Season 8 on DVD |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,035
|
1. Why were the Ropers given their own show?
2.How did the producers get Norman Fell to do a guest appearance when they didn't let him return to the show after his spinoff failed. 3.Why Chrissy never did a phone scene with her own relative-Cindy Snow |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
mcphee.
Forum Superstar
Join Date: Jan 30, 2003
Location: jacksonville, FL.
Posts: 28,115
|
1. The Ropers were given their own show, because the producers wanted to capitalize on Three's Company's success. They thought they could build up another hit comedy, but obviously they were wrong.
Thought: I think that if they followed up Three's Company with the Ropers, then it would've done MUCH MUCH better. But the one joke problem was a big problem. 2. Well the guest appearance in season 5 (i think), was probably to boost up the ratings, ya know, bring back some old faces. The Ropers couldnt return permanently because they made a deal, and also cuz they didnt need them. 3. I have no clue. Good question. I think that since Janet and Chrissy were best friends, then it would be right for them to talk? I dont know, Jack only talked once. I have no clue why. Kinda dumb if you ask me. But, I dont know. I guess the audience preferred Janet? Hope I helped |
|
__________________
v. 39 - katharine and chris elliott, you rock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,035
|
Quote:
I would have thought that Norman Fell would have declined to do a guest appearance since he was told he was no longer needed as a regular character. I wonder what made him agree to do the guest appearance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
mcphee.
Forum Superstar
Join Date: Jan 30, 2003
Location: jacksonville, FL.
Posts: 28,115
|
Probably he missed it
lol.... i dunno. for the money? hehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
moo
Forum Fanatic
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,035
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
1st Female Triple Crown Champ
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 28, 2003
Location: Watching Three's Company & Wrestling
Posts: 8,925
|
Do you think the show would've changed if Don Knotts(Mr.Furley) didn't come on hte show and the Ropers never had their own sitcom?More or less shows?
|
|
__________________
Mickie is the best woman to step inside the ring http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOTh3hVT0HU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,035
|
Quote:
Yes because Mr. Roper was very entertaining. Mr. Furley was OK. Yes it would have lasted much longer-1986-87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
beckyc
Frequent Poster
Join Date: May 27, 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 257
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|