What is the obsession with Chuck? - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

jewlmc · 10-11-2002, 01:50 PM

I don't get this. I see people here, and at jumpthshark.com(Which BTW is a really horrid and bitter site IMO) going on and on about Chuck disappearing.

WHO CARES??

Is it me or was Chuck a poorly concieved, poorly written and acted(by two different guys) character that just didn't fit with anything? He had absolutely ZERO personality and seemed to just be there so Richie had an older brother(not that he was ever very brotherly anyways. At least not much). Personally one of the best things the show did was dump Chuck. I wish they never had him to begin with.

Frankly I think the only reason anyone THINKS about Chuck at all is because he was written out. If he wasn't I think people would be going on about how TERRIBLE he was and he should have been dropped. JMO.

¤I Love Clay Aiken¤ · 10-11-2002, 02:03 PM

Ahhh! Chuck was awesome!! Especially Chuck #1. #2 was so-so. Chuck #1 was just so goofy and dumb--you HAD to love him!

Although I DO agree with you about the comment you made @ the end. Frankly I think the only reason anyone THINKS about Chuck at all is because he was written out. If he wasn't I think people would be going on about how TERRIBLE he was and he should have been dropped. JMO.
That is true..if he had stayed on, he wouldve looked like an idiot and we'd all be wondering *WHY IS THIS GUY STILL ON??!?!*

But, I love Chuck more than Roger and all those post 1980's Clan combined! To me, Chuck was like a gag...Im glad he didnt stay on...yet disappointed they didnt keep him another season or 2 for some really funny moments. If he had stayed on too long, we wouldve gotten sick of him.

¤I Love Clay Aiken¤ · 10-11-2002, 02:05 PM

Ohh yeah....

As much as I LOVE this show, I get a kick out of reading all the comments on JumpTheShark.com Some are just cruel or stupid...but some have me in stitches!! Its an HONOR for Happy Days to have a website named after them...even if it is insulting.

TJL · 10-11-2002, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jewlmc

Chuck a poorly concieved, poorly written and acted(by two different guys) character that just didn't fit with anything? He had absolutely ZERO personality and seemed to just be there so Richie had an older brother(not that he was ever very brotherly anyways. At least not much).
Frankly I think the only reason anyone THINKS about Chuck at all is because he was written out. If he wasn't I think people would be going on about how TERRIBLE he was and he should have been dropped. JMO.

I'm not going to argue with you. Chuck was a character that was not going to work out, especially when Fonz took over as the big brother in Richie's life.
I think the reason why everyone is so fascinated with Chuck is because his disappearance WAS NEVER MENTIONED. He just vanished, and the Cunninghams went on with their sitcom lives.

¤I Love Clay Aiken¤ · 10-11-2002, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TJL
I think the reason why everyone is so fascinated with Chuck is because his disappearance WAS NEVER MENTIONED. He just vanished, and the Cunninghams went on with their sitcom lives.

And what about that girl on Family Matters who turned into a porn star?? I couldve cared less when she left. Although each week I wondered where she went...

TJL · 10-11-2002, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by .:MilKnPepSi:.

And what about that girl on Family Matters who turned into a porn star??

Which one?

Not Urkel, right?

¤I Love Clay Aiken¤ · 10-11-2002, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TJL

Which one?

Not Urkel, right?

lolol oh God. Not Laura...the younger one...See..I knew no one would remember her!!!!!!

bandito · 10-11-2002, 11:18 PM

what is wrong with chuck? the show never gave him a chance he might have played a pretty funny character

Stormtracker TF · 10-11-2002, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by .:MilKnPepSi:.
Ohh yeah....

As much as I LOVE this show, I get a kick out of reading all the comments on JumpTheShark.com Some are just cruel or stupid...but some have me in stitches!! Its an HONOR for Happy Days to have a website named after them...even if it is insulting.

That Website Is Wierd! Why In The World Would Anyone Post Something Bad About Happy Days? WHO COULDN'T LOVE HAPPY DAYS?

¤I Love Clay Aiken¤ · 10-11-2002, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheFonz

That Website Is Wierd! Why In The World Would Anyone Post Something Bad About Happy Days? WHO COULDN'T LOVE HAPPY DAYS?

Id never post there-unless I was complaining about Chachi (no one tempt me!!!

), but some of the comments are SO funny. After a while though I get sickened, but it can give me a good laugh at times. But, like I said..I feel honored that my favorite show has a website named after them...its like a statue...that a pigeon just left its marking on..

10-11-2002, 01:50 PM	#1
jewlmc Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Dec 03, 2001 Location: Niagara Falls, N.Y. 14301 Posts: 53	What is the obsession with Chuck? I don't get this. I see people here, and at jumpthshark.com(Which BTW is a really horrid and bitter site IMO) going on and on about Chuck disappearing. WHO CARES?? Is it me or was Chuck a poorly concieved, poorly written and acted(by two different guys) character that just didn't fit with anything? He had absolutely ZERO personality and seemed to just be there so Richie had an older brother(not that he was ever very brotherly anyways. At least not much). Personally one of the best things the show did was dump Chuck. I wish they never had him to begin with. Frankly I think the only reason anyone THINKS about Chuck at all is because he was written out. If he wasn't I think people would be going on about how TERRIBLE he was and he should have been dropped. JMO.
	__________________ Lover of ALL good sitcoms.

10-11-2002, 11:18 PM	#8
bandito Going Topless Forum Veteran Join Date: Sep 28, 2002 Location: The Steel City Posts: 6,320	what is wrong with chuck? the show never gave him a chance he might have played a pretty funny character
	__________________ bandito

10-11-2002, 02:03 PM	#2
¤I Love Clay Aiken¤ MISS APRIL Forum Addict Join Date: Jul 19, 2001 Location: Parsonsfield ME Shaws - Screwing my way up the employment ladder! Posts: 68,780	Ahhh! Chuck was awesome!! Especially Chuck #1. #2 was so-so. Chuck #1 was just so goofy and dumb--you HAD to love him! Although I DO agree with you about the comment you made @ the end. Frankly I think the only reason anyone THINKS about Chuck at all is because he was written out. If he wasn't I think people would be going on about how TERRIBLE he was and he should have been dropped. JMO. That is true..if he had stayed on, he wouldve looked like an idiot and we'd all be wondering WHY IS THIS GUY STILL ON??!?! But, I love Chuck more than Roger and all those post 1980's Clan combined! To me, Chuck was like a gag...Im glad he didnt stay on...yet disappointed they didnt keep him another season or 2 for some really funny moments. If he had stayed on too long, we wouldve gotten sick of him.
	__________________ DAVID COOK FOR AMERICAN IDOL

10-11-2002, 02:05 PM	#3
¤I Love Clay Aiken¤ MISS APRIL Forum Addict Join Date: Jul 19, 2001 Location: Parsonsfield ME Shaws - Screwing my way up the employment ladder! Posts: 68,780	Ohh yeah.... As much as I LOVE this show, I get a kick out of reading all the comments on JumpTheShark.com Some are just cruel or stupid...but some have me in stitches!! Its an HONOR for Happy Days to have a website named after them...even if it is insulting.