View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Charles in Charge Online / Charles in Charge links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / Charles in Charge Photo Gallery
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yo.....<unnecessary comments deleted>! i mean, why couldn't she do anything for herself? can anyone stand her voice....or even to look at her? dude, she was a disgrace to the Powell family, she only caused problems to all of the funny, clever plans charles and buddy created.....she is like scrappy on scooby doo....adds nothing but takes away so much.....and so my friends i leave you with this....how much further could the show have gone if it weren't for that poor poor worthless girl.
"hey, garth" "yeah" "that was a haiku!" ~wayne~ [This message has been edited by TJ (edited 12-29-2000).] |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Nov 19, 2000
Location: Richmond
Posts: 61
|
Well I cant say she was the most interesting character but she did kind of add a nice opposite to Jamie. I take it you did not like her? LOL Well we honor all types opinions here but in the future could you not use profanity and sexist slurs here? I'm no prude but it really has no place on this message board. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jun 11, 2000
Location: NO, LA, USA
Posts: 105
|
Thanks for saying that, Brendon. We don't need any curse words or nasty stuff on here. I didn't like Sarah either, but I'm not gonna go that far. I just think that she was too smart and you know save the worldish instead of having a good time. At least Douglas from The pembroke season liked to have fun, and the stuff about science he talked about was actually funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Nov 19, 2000
Location: Richmond
Posts: 61
|
Thanks for the reply Jill. Yes I think Sarah was far too whiny. Like you said, Douglas was weird but fun. I think maybe the producers were trying to change the format of the old show but keep the characters mostly the same. I mean they swapped one girl and two boys for two girls and one boy but the characters were pretty much the same, or at least tried to be. Lila was Jamie, popular and peppy, Sarah was Douglas, smart and strange, and Adam was Jason, precocious and wisecracking. It just proves that characters are not just created by producers but btought to life by the actors that play them becuase even though the CIC producers TRIED to mimic the old kids it just was not the same in the end. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 04, 2000
Location: New York, New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 10,857
|
I too agree with doing away with the profanity. It's not necessary. Anyway I saw not problem with Sarah. Besides, in the last 2 seasons of the show I thought she got better. She found more confidence in herself. I liked Douglas it just seemed to me he acted like he was ******** at times. It was just funny but he's alright too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
B and co, u are the only person that has any sense on the whole damn message board. what's up with you people, do you guys have no lives, what the hell do u care if someone uses any profane language? and as to brendans "LOL", i hate computer talk! thanks again to B and co, for proving at least one person can be normal and be cool
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 04, 2000
Location: New York, New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 10,857
|
I don't care what anybody says, there is a better way to get a point across without using words that may offend others.I disagree about the part about something being wrong with everybody else on the board when they all including myself have valid points. Dang, let's just share our opinions about the subjects without critizing others. It's your board. "KEEP IT CLEAN"!
It is so annoying to have members put down other people on the board. Nobody's perfect but still out of respect 4 others we need to be respectful. There are also young children taht read this board. They probably get enough of the profanity mess from school and peers, it should not have to be exposed to them everywhere. I don't care, we need to take into consideration how others may feel and THAT'S THAT! There is no need for stupid conflict among message board members. That is ridiculous. If there are disagreemets, let them be in referecnce to the show and not TO EACH OTHER! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 04, 2000
Location: New York, New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 10,857
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Nov 28, 2000
Location: N.C.
Posts: 78
|
Well, I hang around college students all day long and I hear everything but clean words coming out of their mouths, so to frequent a BBoard with no profanity is a rather nice change once in awhile!!! It also has no place on a BBoard about a family-type show where, as another put it, younger viewers may see it.
As to the original content of the post, I personally think that Sarah was a lot prettier than Jamie and I have always liked her better. Jamie was just a selfish, shallow, blonde who cared for nothing or nobody other than herself. True, it is hard to believe that there are kids like Sarah nowadays and her poetry and "all for the good in things" attitude was sometimes hard to take, but she was a total opposite of Jamie and I think that's what the producers wanted. If the kids were all the same, then the show would definitely lose a certain spark of conflict that arises. As Charles said in the first episode, "I have to save Sarah from Jamie. I have to save Jamie from Jamie!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
|
Remember, it's just a show man.
Sarah prettier than Jamie? LOL I believe I've heard it all. Congratulations. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 04, 2000
Location: New York, New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 10,857
|
Sarah has to be one of my favorites too. I did not like Jaimee. She was alright sometimes. Nichole Eggert played that "love to hate" character well. She is a good actress to me. There are girls out there like Jaimee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Forum Hawk
Join Date: Jan 24, 2001
Posts: 3
|
About Sarah
I see her in the same light as I see Lisa Simpson now. It's all about contrast. Would Jamie be a better character if Sarah didn't exsist? I personaly don't think so. I also thought Sarah was better looking than Jamie. Because Jamie has such a typical look about her. At the time you could find a ton of girls who looked just like her. Sarah was innocent and pure. As she got older she just got better looking. Have you seen what she looks like now? MY GOD MAN!!! <<cough cough>> Sorry, lost myself for a second. To sum it up, she was a much needed character on that show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Nov 28, 2000
Location: N.C.
Posts: 78
|
Absolutely right, Groo. THe contrast between the two was the main impetus for the character. Let's face it, it is the infighting between Jamie and Sarah that gets most of the attention amongst the kids. Adam was just there to add cuteness and annoyance. But the real struggle was Jamie and Sarah. Two teen girls with a guy looking out for them! WHat a hoot!
As to Josie Davis nowadays, absolutely hot!!! She was on the prime time soap, Titans, on NBC, but it just got cancelled. So, who knows where she'll land? Hopefully, she will land soon and we can keep on seeing her. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
|
I think you people are crazy (or blind one)for making these absurd comments. You could find a ton of girls who looked just like Nicole Eggert (that's her name by the way; not Jaime)? That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read! Nicole Eggert is a one of a kind KNOCK-OUT! She was the most gorgeous teenage girl in the entire world, and she looks even better now.
Josie Davis (that's her name; not Sarah) was the girl everyone felt sorry for. She was so homely looking and dull. In People magazine, she revealed that she never wanted to leave her home because people on the street would say "Hey, that's the ugly girl from Charles in Charge." And now, even though she actually wears makeup, she still has a weird complexion about her. Nicole Eggert has natural beauty, meaning that no makeup is required. Can't say the same for Josie . . . |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 04, 2000
Location: New York, New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 10,857
|
Josie looks real good now. She's a knockout. To me she was never ugly. There was nothing ugly about her. Why would people say that?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|