Sitcoms Online - Main Page / Message Boards - Main Page / News Blog / Photo Galleries / DVD Reviews / Buy TV Shows on DVD and Blu-ray

View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board

The Facts of Life Online / The Facts of Life links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / The Facts of Life Photo Gallery / The Facts of Life - Fan Fiction Board / The Division Board


The Facts of Life - The Complete First and Second Seasons

Buy The Facts of Life - The Complete First and Second Seasons on DVD
The Facts of Life - The Complete Third Season

Buy The Facts of Life - The Complete Third Season on DVD
The Facts of Life - The Complete Fourth Season

Buy The Facts of Life - The Complete Fourth Season on DVD
The Facts of Life - The Complete Fifth Season

Buy The Facts of Life - The Complete Fifth Season on DVD
The Facts of Life - Season Six

Buy The Facts of Life - Season Six on DVD
The Facts of Life - Season Seven

Buy The Facts of Life - Season Seven on DVD
The Facts of Life - Season Eight

Buy The Facts of Life - Season Eight on DVD
The Facts of Life - The Final (Ninth) Season

Buy The Facts of Life - The Final (Ninth) Season on DVD
The Facts of Life - The Complete Series

Buy The Facts of Life - The Complete Series on DVD (Amazon.com)

(Shout! Factory)

Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums  

Go Back   Sitcoms Online Message Boards - Forums > 1980s Sitcoms > The Facts of Life
Register Community View Today's Active Threads (No CC/CC Only) Search Photo Galleries Calendar FAQ

Notices

SitcomsOnline.com News Blog Headlines Facebook X/Twitter Bluesky Threads Instagram YouTube RSS

Great Entertainment Television Acquires House; Remembering Louise Lasser of Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman
78th Primetime Emmy Award Nominations; Disney's The Cheetah Girls: Next Gen
Ian Ziering Hosting The CW Road Trip Series; Shark Tank Season 18 Guest Sharks
Great Entertainment Television's Psych 20th Anniversary Marathon; Netflix Announces Cast for Myron Bolitar
Life, Larry, and the Pursuit of Unhappiness Capsule; Michael Weatherly Returns to NCIS
Sitcom Stars on Talk Shows; This Week in Sitcoms (Week of July 6, 2026)
SitcomsOnline Digest: Elle Renewed for Second Season; NBCUniversal to Separate from Comcast


New on DVD and Blu-ray

Happy's Place - Season One (Blu-ray) Two and a Half Men - The Complete Series (Blu-ray) Abbott Elementary - The Complete Fourth Season (DVD) I Love Lucy - The Complete Series - 75th Anniversary Edition (DVD) The Office - The Complete Series - Superfan Extended Episodes (Blu-ray)

11/04/25 - Happy's Place - Season One (Blu-ray) (DVD)
11/11/25 - Rick and Morty - Season 8 (Blu-ray) (DVD)
11/11/25 - SpongeBob SquarePants - The Complete Fifteenth Season (DVD)
11/11/25 - Two and a Half Men - The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
12/02/25 - Tom and Jerry - The Golden Era Anthology (1940-1958) (Blu-ray) (DVD)
12/16/25 - Lippy the Lion and Hardy Har Har - The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
12/16/25 - Wally Gator - The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
01/20/26 - The Woody Woodpecker and Friends Golden Age Collection (Blu-ray)
01/27/26 - The New Fred and Barney Show - The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
02/11/26 - Tom and Jerry - The Complete CinemaScope Collection (Blu-ray)
03/24/26 - Looney Tunes Collector's Vault - Volume 2 (Blu-ray)
04/11/26 - Abbott Elementary - The Complete Fourth Season (DVD)
04/21/26 - Famous Studios Champion Collection (Blu-ray) (DVD)
05/19/26 - I Love Lucy - The Complete Series - 75th Anniversary Edition (DVD)
05/19/26 - Looney Tunes Cartoons - The Complete Series (Blu-ray) (DVD)
07/14/26 - The Office - The Complete Series - Superfan Extended Episodes (Blu-ray)
07/28/26 - I Love Lucy - The Complete Series - 75th Anniversary Edition (Blu-ray)

More Recent and Upcoming TV DVD and Blu-ray Releases / TV Shows on DVD, Blu-ray and Prime Video / DVD Reviews Archive


Search Sitcoms Online:



Donate

Please make a donation if you can help with Sitcoms Online's web hosting costs. Thanks for your support!

We receive a small commission on all DVDs, Blu-rays, CDs, Books, and any other items ordered through our Amazon.com links as an associate. Thanks for using our links for your online shopping!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-21-2020, 03:31 PM   #1
cfr1970
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
 
cfr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2017
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 3,368
Default Lisa Whelchel as Rachel Greene

I'm sure this has been discussed, but I just found out she was offered this part on Friends and turned it down. I think she would have been a great Rachel and given the role a different dimension than Jennifer Aniston did. I also think she would've brought more depth to the character than Aniston did and wish she'd have taken it.

The more I think about it, the more I feel that role would've been perfect for her. Had she taken it, i'd probably be a fan of the Friends reruns, but Aniston has always turned me off so I never watch it. There's this smugness to her I can't quite put my finger on whereas Whelchel comes across as the exact opposite....down to earth and friendly.
cfr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2020, 03:59 PM   #2
Sitcommania
Member
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 01, 2018
Location: New york
Posts: 309
Default

I think she was only asked to audition. But I agree she would have made a great Rachel and Nancy McKeon would have been a great Monica; it did come down between her and Courteney Cox. I think that’s part of the reason Nancy M. Worked so hard to distance herself from Facts.
Sitcommania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2020, 04:09 PM   #3
cfr1970
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
 
cfr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2017
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 3,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sitcommania View Post
I think she was only asked to audition. But I agree she would have made a great Rachel and Nancy McKeon would have been a great Monica; it did come down between her and Courteney Cox. I think that’s part of the reason Nancy M. Worked so hard to distance herself from Facts.
I too think Nancy McKeon would have been great as Monica. I wish we could have seen that! I wonder if audition tapes are out there of her trying out for it. That would be so fun to see.

Has anyone seen her in The Division? I never watched it and all I know is it was some Lifetime series, but it was apparently a hit for the channel. If any fans of that show are here, is it recommended for Nancy McKeon fans? Does she effectively shed her "Jo" personality in it?

I may give it a try as i'm always looking for "new" old shows to discover.
cfr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2020, 04:20 PM   #4
Bonniegirl
AKA Hazel Horvath
Forum Addict
 
Bonniegirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 10, 2014
Posts: 65,814
Default

No offense to Lisa and Nancy, and it is just my opinion , but I think they were a little too old to play Rachel and Monica !
Bonniegirl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2020, 04:31 PM   #5
cfr1970
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
 
cfr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2017
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 3,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonniegirl View Post
No offense to Lisa and Nancy, and it is just my opinion , but I think they were a little too old to play Rachel and Monica !
I disagree. Nancy McKeon was 2 years younger than Courteney Cox, so she certainly could've played Monica. Lisa Whelchel was 31 to Jennifer Aniston's 25, but I think she still could've pulled it off easily as she has a very youthful appearance, and at 56 now, she still looks 10 years younger imo.
cfr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2020, 04:54 PM   #6
TSMIV
Member
Forum Regular
 
TSMIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 29, 2018
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 696
Default

Ugh, glad that didn't happen. Jennifer was perfect for Rachel. Her character is supposed to be a little bit of a spoiled snobby princess, in spite of that; she's basically a nice girl. If they auditioned Lisa, its because they had Blair in mind. Part of what made the show a hit is that the 6 actors were basically unknown. It would have bombed with Nancy and Lisa playing older versions of characters they already played.
TSMIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2020, 05:00 PM   #7
Sitcommania
Member
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 01, 2018
Location: New york
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSMIV View Post
Ugh, glad that didn't happen. Jennifer was perfect for Rachel. Her character is supposed to be a little bit of a spoiled snobby princess, in spite of that; she's basically a nice girl. If they auditioned Lisa, its because they had Blair in mind. Part of what made the show a hit is that the 6 actors were basically unknown. It would have bombed with Nancy and Lisa playing older versions of characters they already played.
Another reason they didn’t choose Nancy.
Sitcommania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2020, 05:06 PM   #8
Bonniegirl
AKA Hazel Horvath
Forum Addict
 
Bonniegirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 10, 2014
Posts: 65,814
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSMIV View Post
Ugh, glad that didn't happen. Jennifer was perfect for Rachel. Her character is supposed to be a little bit of a spoiled snobby princess, in spite of that; she's basically a nice girl. If they auditioned Lisa, its because they had Blair in mind. Part of what made the show a hit is that the 6 actors were basically unknown. It would have bombed with Nancy and Lisa playing older versions of characters they already played.
I agree!
Bonniegirl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2020, 05:08 PM   #9
cfr1970
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
 
cfr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2017
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 3,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSMIV View Post
Ugh, glad that didn't happen. Jennifer was perfect for Rachel. Her character is supposed to be a little bit of a spoiled snobby princess, in spite of that; she's basically a nice girl. If they auditioned Lisa, its because they had Blair in mind. Part of what made the show a hit is that the 6 actors were basically unknown. It would have bombed with Nancy and Lisa playing older versions of characters they already played.
Looking at it from that perspective it does make sense. Audiences could've assumed it was a Jo & Blair reunion of sorts and not bothered to tune in, hindering it's potential to become the mega hit it became.

I guess having all 6 being unknowns actually helped it because I remember it being a hit right out of the gate. I still think Lisa and Nancy would've been great in the roles though.
cfr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2020, 11:52 PM   #10
RetroGuy2000
Julie,Julie Anne,&Felice 4Ever
Forum Star
 
RetroGuy2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 27, 2013
Posts: 16,914
Default

As much as I love Lisa, she would have been woefully miscast on Friends.

Much of Friends was pretty racy for its era. In the pilot, Monica sleeps with a guy she's just met, and he doesn't call her afterwards. Between them, the Friends sleep with a small army of characters they're not married to: Paul the Wine Guy, Kathy, Janice, Janine, Mona, Emily, the copy place girl, Paulo, Mike, David, Tom Selleck, Charlie Sheen, most of Joey's dates... This is just the short version of this list.

Lisa totally opposed sex before marriage, and refused to appear in a FOL episode where even her character stayed chaste, just because another character did not. Can you imagine how many episodes of Friends Lisa would have boycotted? We would have seen her in, like, three episodes per season!
RetroGuy2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2020, 12:22 AM   #11
cfr1970
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
 
cfr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2017
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 3,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RetroGuy2000 View Post
As much as I love Lisa, she would have been woefully miscast on Friends.

Much of Friends was pretty racy for its era. In the pilot, Monica sleeps with a guy she's just met, and he doesn't call her afterwards. Between them, the Friends sleep with a small army of characters they're not married to: Paul the Wine Guy, Kathy, Janice, Janine, Mona, Emily, the copy place girl, Paulo, Mike, David, Tom Selleck, Charlie Sheen, most of Joey's dates... This is just the short version of this list.

Lisa totally opposed sex before marriage, and refused to appear in a FOL episode where even her character stayed chaste, just because another character did not. Can you imagine how many episodes of Friends Lisa would have boycotted? We would have seen her in, like, three episodes per season!
Good point and very logical. I didn't know her chaste views on sex before marriage extended past FOL. I read she turned Friends down because she found the script racy and she felt the show was going to deal a lot with dating and sex, but being a teen depicting the first time it is one thing....being 31 and still clinging on to that chastity belt before marriage is a bit extreme, but I respect her views nonetheless.

It's rare to see that in Hollywood so good for her. I guess her presence and deep views would have eventually disrupted the set and she ultimately made the right choice for herself and the show.

I still like to imagine what she'd be like as Rachel. Jennifer Aniston imo has been Rachel Green in everything she's done since Friends that it's clear to me she was just playing herself on that show. I think the woman has zero acting range.
cfr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2020, 01:04 AM   #12
Bonniegirl
AKA Hazel Horvath
Forum Addict
 
Bonniegirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 10, 2014
Posts: 65,814
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfr1970 View Post
Good point and very logical. I didn't know her chaste views on sex before marriage extended past FOL. I read she turned Friends down because she found the script racy and she felt the show was going to deal a lot with dating and sex, but being a teen depicting the first time it is one thing....being 31 and still clinging on to that chastity belt before marriage is a bit extreme, but I respect her views nonetheless.

It's rare to see that in Hollywood so good for her. I guess her presence and deep views would have eventually disrupted the set and she ultimately made the right choice for herself and the show.

I still like to imagine what she'd be like as Rachel. Jennifer Aniston imo has been Rachel Green in everything she's done since Friends that it's clear to me she was just playing herself on that show. I think the woman has zero acting range.

Well I admit she isn't exactly on Bette Davis's caliber of acting , but she is an OK actress , bubbly and adorable. She plays bubbly, adorable characters like she is in real life! She was PERFECT as Rachel !
Bonniegirl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2020, 11:23 AM   #13
80s Dude
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 24, 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,818
Default

Ironically the role of Monica got filled by Nancy M.'s ex boyfriend's last TV girlfriend.
80s Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2020, 11:36 AM   #14
RetroGuy2000
Julie,Julie Anne,&Felice 4Ever
Forum Star
 
RetroGuy2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 27, 2013
Posts: 16,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 80s Dude View Post
Ironically the role of Monica got filled by Nancy M.'s ex boyfriend's last TV girlfriend.
Haha! Yeah, too bad it wasn't Nancy M's brother's first girlfriend.

Just kidding. I wouldn't have recast Friends at all. The casting was perfect. I don't care if Jennifer has no range: she was excellent in that role.
RetroGuy2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2020, 11:43 AM   #15
TSMIV
Member
Forum Regular
 
TSMIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 29, 2018
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 696
Default

I've always thought Jen was the best comedienne of the three Friends girls (yes, I think Lisa Kudrow is overrated). Jennifer stinks at drama or maybe she's just lousy at choosing dramatic roles.
TSMIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Although the administrators and moderators of the Sitcoms Online Message Boards will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this forum, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of the Sitcoms Online Message Boards, nor vBulletin Solutions Inc. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message. The owners of the Sitcoms Online Message Boards reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.