View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Aug 04, 2009
Location: Memphis Tennessee
Posts: 3,072
|
I think the show is rather hit and miss. It is not like the old Rod Serling show to me. This show is much more dark and spooky. It has sort of gotten my interest but I find some flaws with it.
1. The episodes are too long, and an hour show is too long in this format. The early 1960's show could set up the plot rather quickly and then resolve what happens in the end. Because that was sort of what made the show great, the endings. 2. It is dark and spooky. Some of Serling's shows were dark and really spooky but there were some that were not, and even heartwarming to a point. I have never seen Serling's later show Night Gallery but perhaps this new reboot is more like Night Gallery that the Twilight Zone. 3. The swearing. Now, I am not against swearing in movies and in some TV shows. Concerning TV, some shows must have swearing. The Sopranos is a good example. Sociopathic criminal folk swear a lot, and in this context, the so called "f-word" and "s-word" among others. But here to me it doesn't work because it takes away the spirit of the old show. I don't think Serling would have employed this in the early 1960's even if there was no issue with him doing it. That is the weird thing here. Also, another "CBS Access" series, Star Trek Discovery slips in an "s-word" or an "f-word" at least once an episode. Again, the other shows and the Trek films didn't employ that, even soft swearing like "damn" "hell" etc. I will say that Jordan Peele is a pretty good nararator, but again tends to be spooky in his approach. Again the Twilight Zone, the literal zone itself is not always spooky, scary and forboding. Who else likes or dislikes the show? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Forum Star
Join Date: Oct 23, 2015
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 17,201
|
Never watch the 2019 version of The Twilight Zone because it won't be as long as the original.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Veteran Join Date: Jul 26, 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 6,824
|
It doesn't hold a candle to the original. It's not even close.
I watched the first episode and it had its good points but wasn't my cup of tea. It didn't feel like Twilight Zone at all. They took an admittedly decent premise and stretched it into an hour of awkward dialogue and dull repetition. Jordan Peele's performance was mostly unremarkable IMO. Judging from some of the recent trailers they're going for increasingly political stories devoid of subtlety. Should have seen that coming. I know Serling had occasional political episodes but they're laying it on so thick here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Idol Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 127,116
|
I watched the first episode and thought that it was just okay, but my mom wasn’t impressed at all.
|
|
__________________
~-*Mikaela*-~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
22 Years On Sitcoms
Moderator
Forum Legend Join Date: Aug 13, 2003
Location: Indy
Posts: 44,205
|
How are the 1980s episodes? I think these are the ones MeTV will start showing in a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
star trek fan
Eternal Member
![]() Forum Fanatic Join Date: Feb 25, 2002
Location: Conshohocken, pennsylvania
Posts: 14,490
|
|
|
__________________
the Clampetts are in a fancy Beverly Hills jewelry store. Granny points to a tray of rubies. Granny: "How much fer one o' them red diamonds?" clerk: "Madam, those are rubies." Granny: "OK ask her kin we buy one offa her." clerk: " The ruby I am talking about is not a lady." Granny: "Lissen, how she got them diamonds is her business. I'm just sayin' ask her kin we buy one from her." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Idol Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 127,116
|
The 1980's episodes will start airing on May 28th. As for the original show, it can still be seen on Syfy.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|