Rebbeca Young Murder - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

BDR · 02-12-2019, 07:59 AM

This is the case where the woman was killed by the two men in the field. What always confused me is why the witness "Antonio" stood there and watch it happen when he was armed with a gun? He could have saved her life. He was concerned enough to call the police after the fact but didn't do anything to stop it while he had a gun in his hand.

1990 UM fan · 02-12-2019, 11:08 AM

I don't recall him having a gun in the reenactment. It's possible that Unsolved Mysteries added that in for effects but Antonio probably never really had a gun. He was already illegally hunting in a sugar cane field, so he probably didn't want to lead on that he had a gun (If he did).

BDR · 02-12-2019, 12:39 PM

he had a rifle.

James T · 02-13-2019, 05:13 PM

Most likely because he was the killer giving a phony description of the killers, or had heard the killer bragging about it & in reality wasn't there when it happened. The fact that he was armed means if he was telling the truth he is a pathetic excuse for a human being watching somebody get killed in front of his eyes when he could have prevented it-don;t know how anybody could live with themselves knowing they just let somebody be murdered when they had the means to prevent it.

02-12-2019, 07:59 AM	#1
BDR Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jan 23, 2017 Posts: 35	Rebbeca Young Murder This is the case where the woman was killed by the two men in the field. What always confused me is why the witness "Antonio" stood there and watch it happen when he was armed with a gun? He could have saved her life. He was concerned enough to call the police after the fact but didn't do anything to stop it while he had a gun in his hand.

02-12-2019, 11:08 AM	#2
1990 UM fan Unsolved Mysteries fanatic Senior Member Join Date: Jul 14, 2011 Location: United States Posts: 2,510	I don't recall him having a gun in the reenactment. It's possible that Unsolved Mysteries added that in for effects but Antonio probably never really had a gun. He was already illegally hunting in a sugar cane field, so he probably didn't want to lead on that he had a gun (If he did).
	__________________ Join my Unsolved Mysteries page (Facebook): http://www.facebook.com/pages/Unsolv...899616?sk=wall

02-12-2019, 12:39 PM	#3
BDR Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jan 23, 2017 Posts: 35	he had a rifle.

02-13-2019, 05:13 PM	#4
James T Member Senior Member Join Date: Apr 23, 2006 Location: England Posts: 1,567	Most likely because he was the killer giving a phony description of the killers, or had heard the killer bragging about it & in reality wasn't there when it happened. The fact that he was armed means if he was telling the truth he is a pathetic excuse for a human being watching somebody get killed in front of his eyes when he could have prevented it-don;t know how anybody could live with themselves knowing they just let somebody be murdered when they had the means to prevent it.