View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Unsolved Mysteries Online Main Page / Message Board / Show History / Episode Guide (1987-2002) / Expanded Episode Guide #2 / Expanded Episode Guide #3 / Case Updates / Wiki / Official Site / Related Links
True Crime Shows Message Board / View Latest Threads in True Crime Shows / America's Most Wanted (AMW) / American Justice / City Confidential / Cold Case Files / Dateline / Disappeared / Forensic Files / 48 Hours / The Hunt with John Walsh / In Pursuit with John Walsh / Missing: Reward / On the Case with Paula Zahn / All Other Cases
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
#VLSKMS
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,630
|
So I've finally made it to season 4 (yay procrastination), and saw this case again. It's the case with the USAF personnel stationed in England who claims to have seen unexplained lights over the course of a 3 day span back in 1980. I always thought this one had more credibility than many of the other UFO cases because there were actual military reports done, acknowledged, and handed over. But I found this article from a skeptic who claims that the entire thing was nothing more than the men witnesses reflective lights from a nearby lighthouse (which most of the men did not know existed), and also lights from 5 nearby radio towers. And the landing spot was written off by the local English police as rabbit diggings. And there was an undisputed fact that on the first night of the sightings, a meteor had been witnessed by multiple people in the surrounding area, which could explain the craft like structure described by the air force.
On the surface, all of this makes sense. But the skeptic article does not address the fact that the "landing spot" described by the men was a perfectly symmetrical triangle, with each hole being an equal distance apart. I don't see how random rabbit diggings would be that precise. Nor does it mention the 2nd in command of the base (Col. Halt), who claims to have seen one object approach and shoot a beam of light down for a few seconds before disappearing into the sky. I still don't believe in aliens, but I am curious as to what these men could've witnessed that night. I'm still not convinced that they were all confused by nearby lights from a light house and radio towers. What are you're thoughts on this case? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 10, 2017
Posts: 2,256
|
Aliens don't exist.
So they saw lights. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Nov 18, 2014
Location: kansas
Posts: 430
|
skeptics have vivid imagination
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 14, 2010
Posts: 1,874
|
I've always found this story extra-intriguing when you account for the fact that the Cash-Landrum UFO incident literally occurred only one day after the last reported sighting in Rendlesham. I know this happened in England and the Cash-Landrum sighting occurred in Texas, but the latter is undoubtedly the most credible UFO story on UM since the witnesses all developed serious illnesses, so they definitely encountered something strange, even if it wasn't aliens. When I originally watched these segments back in the nineties, I was convinced an alien spacecraft had traveled all the way from England to the U.S. and the military was trying to track it down.
Logically, there probably isn't any connection between these two incidents, but the timing is one hell of a coincidence. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Nov 18, 2014
Location: kansas
Posts: 430
|
interesting observation.
perhaps both encountered aliens from same fleet |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
#VLSKMS
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,630
|
Quote:
That's what makes the Bentwaters incident more believable to me. Multiple people, all stationed at an air force base, all claim to have seen similar, unexplained lights, with varying degrees of physical evidence to back up their claims. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Nov 21, 2004
Posts: 394
|
I don't believe in UFOs myself (used to) but I've always found this one of the more credible stories. The people involved are military personal, including a Lt. Colonel. The last place you need to be making up stories like this is the military for the sake of your own career.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 14, 2010
Posts: 1,874
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Jul 12, 2017
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
Concerning the Landrum UFO incident, there's been a lot of debunking of this incident. IIRC, one counter-argument is that if the people really did suffer as much radiation as they claimed to the point of getting sick, it would've been fatal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Aug 08, 2002
Posts: 3,866
|
I remember the Bentwaters/Rendlesham Forest sightings were reenacted on the TV show Sightings and they showed one of the officers with a movie camera and it was implied much of the incident was filmed, but the films were withheld by he government. Of course, the UM episode shows no one with a camera, so I wonder what the truth was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 622
|
I think there's a reasonable explanation for what they witnessed - whether it was the meteors, the landing beacon beams at Bentwaters or the lighthouse (which the witnesses, excepting Colonel Halt, were apparently unfamiliar with) - but what happened will probably never be determined. I don't think they were lying in their original statements or impressions, but there have been some contradictions in statements and embellishments since then. Plus the Ministry of Defence keeping things low key at the time later stoked conspiracy theories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Jul 12, 2017
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
Furthermore, with the Cold War, it was helpful to keep the impression that US military capabilities were stronger than they actually were to intimidate the Soviets. People often forget how interwoven the UFO craze was with the Cold War. It's helpful to keep this all in mind when re-watching the UFO segments. Speaking of which, here's a video from the Smithsonian Channel about how the Bentwaters incident was connected to Cold War tensions: https://www.smithsonianchannel.com/v...paranoia/40501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Feb 17, 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 203
|
I think the guys out in the field did see something that night. Perhaps not of this Earth. Probably never going to get answers though.
|
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 31, 2006
Location: Westeros
Posts: 740
|
This has always been one of my favorite UFO cases on UM. Again, after a copy disappeared from the site that shall not be named, I watched a few other documentaries including this one below (where Larry Warren makes claims of some rather nefarious activity on the part of the gov't)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Aug 19, 2010
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 410
|
Quote:
I too, was always intrigued by the timing of the two alleged sightings. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
1) How do I contact Unsolved Mysteries with information
on segments?
If you any information on cases, you can contact them via:
Website: www.unsolved.com
Contact form on official Unsolved Mysteries site
Please note that their old mailing address and 1-800 phone number no longer work.
2) Where can I watch Unsolved Mysteries? Unsolved Mysteries is available for streaming on Amazon Video and YouTube.