Playboy Bunny claims Bill Cosby tried to kiss, touch her breasts during Christmas Eve

[LittleRickyII]

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...icle-1.2020517

A Playboy bunny says Bill Cosby was hot on her tail after a Christmas Eve dinner with his family.

Sarita Butterfield, now 59 and living in the Bronx, said the married Cosby came on to her in his Massachusetts home with his wife and their five kids in the house.

“He pinned me against the corner in that guest house,” Butterfield told the Daily News about the Dec. 24, 1974, incident. “I said, ‘Your family’s here! What are doing?’ That didn’t faze him.”

The curvaceous Butterfield became a bunny after an introduction from her friend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar to Playboy founder Hugh Hefner. Cosby called after her appearance in the November 1977 magazine.

“He was aggressive,” recalled Butterfield. “He didn’t rape me and he didn’t drug me, but he cornered me. It was so nasty, trying to get a quick kiss and touch my boobs.”

Earlier, Butterfield said, she shared a meal with Cosby, wife Camille and their children after the comic extended an invitation through the magazine’s human resources department.

Cosby paid for her flight from the city to Massachusetts, and sent a driver to the airport, she said.

The then-22-year-old Butterfield had hoped the dinner might kick-start her nascent acting career instead of Cosby’s hormones.

“I felt so cheap,” she recalled to the News. “I was young, and I felt totally dirty. I just felt like I wanted to be invisible, I was so ashamed.”

She recalled Cosby as unruffled: “He masqueraded as a good father. He paraded me around his wife.

[TimOhara123]

Originally Posted by LittleRickyII

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...icle-1.2020517

A Playboy bunny says Bill Cosby was hot on her tail after a Christmas Eve dinner with his family.

Sarita Butterfield, now 59 and living in the Bronx, said the married Cosby came on to her in his Massachusetts home with his wife and their five kids in the house.

“He pinned me against the corner in that guest house,” Butterfield told the Daily News about the Dec. 24, 1974, incident. “I said, ‘Your family’s here! What are doing?’ That didn’t faze him.”

The curvaceous Butterfield became a bunny after an introduction from her friend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar to Playboy founder Hugh Hefner. Cosby called after her appearance in the November 1977 magazine.

“He was aggressive,” recalled Butterfield. “He didn’t rape me and he didn’t drug me, but he cornered me. It was so nasty, trying to get a quick kiss and touch my boobs.”

Earlier, Butterfield said, she shared a meal with Cosby, wife Camille and their children after the comic extended an invitation through the magazine’s human resources department.

Cosby paid for her flight from the city to Massachusetts, and sent a driver to the airport, she said.

The then-22-year-old Butterfield had hoped the dinner might kick-start her nascent acting career instead of Cosby’s hormones.

“I felt so cheap,” she recalled to the News. “I was young, and I felt totally dirty. I just felt like I wanted to be invisible, I was so ashamed.”

She recalled Cosby as unruffled: “He masqueraded as a good father. He paraded me around his wife.

Hmmm looks like she wanted fame in her own words.

The then-22-year-old Butterfield had hoped the dinner might kick-start her nascent acting career instead of Cosby’s hormones.

Read more: http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/...#ixzz3KTQI8t54

[Retro4Life]

Originally Posted by TimOhara123

Hmmm looks like she wanted fame in her own words.

The then-22-year-old Butterfield had hoped the dinner might kick-start her nascent acting career instead of Cosby’s hormones.

Read more: http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/...#ixzz3KTQI8t54

And you are implying that the two things, that is, wanting to help her own career, and being a victim of assault, are mutually exclusive?

If you're using that as your truth barometer, you might as well go ahead and discount the stories of everyone in Hollywood who ever claimed they were assaulted. In fact, you might as well say that every woman who desired a career and claimed assault against someone is suspect.

Seriously, that's not only unfair, it's completely illogical.

[TimOhara123]

She said she was looking for fame, she also said she wasn't raped didn't she. I could claim someone tried to kiss me whether they did or didn't.

Again this woman claims something but lacks proof of anything. I find it really odd that out of all these women not one can back up what they are saying.

[Retro4Life]

Originally Posted by TimOhara123

She said she was looking for fame, she also said she wasn't raped didn't she. I could claim someone tried to kiss me whether they did or didn't.

Again this woman claims something but lacks proof of anything. I find it really odd that out of all these women not one can back up what they are saying.

So what is your point here? That if you are physically assaulted, it's very important to somehow have the presence of mind, the time, and the ability, to gather 'proof', because if you don't, no one should believe your story? What would constitute 'proof' in your mind? A blue dress, a la Monica Lewinsky? Most people are not thinking logically when they are faced with what is a horribly stressful and traumatic event.

Look, I've read your posts vehemently defending Cosby in other threads, and it seems as if you work backwards from the premise that "Cosby is innocent" and you fit all the stories into that box, or at least you try to.

Is he guilty? I don't know, and neither do you. But I think it's perfectly fair, and logical, to have some serious questions raised in your mind by all of these allegations. You keep talking about fame. What possible kind of fame could result from these women coming forward decades later? I haven't heard one book deal in the lot. I doubt they get paid much, if anything, for an internet news interview. And then weigh that against the risk of the stigma that will result from such claims. You've already done it, sorry to say, by casting aspersions as to their motivations. Why would they risk that type of criticism for, let's face it, basically nothing?

And what about the former NBC facilities manager that came forward saying he'd paid women off for Cosby? Is he "in on it", too?

NO ONE here is saying they would find him guilty if they were on a jury; that requires an overwhelming preponderance of evidence, and no one knows what they would do in such a situation. What we are, and should be, saying is that these stories raise grave questions and they should not be just tossed aside because it's uncomfortable to think that an icon could do such things.

[LittleRickyII]

Originally Posted by Retro4Life

Seriously, that's not only unfair, it's completely illogical.

Logic is not Mr. O'Hara's forte.

Originally Posted by Retro4Life

I doubt they get paid much, if anything, for an internet news interview. And then weigh that against the risk of the stigma that will result from such claims.

You raise a lot of excellent points. To this I would add that the risk these women (and that one man) are taking with their allegations is huge because Bill Cosby is a super wealthy individual who can afford all the very best lawyers in the country. If these people are lying, Bill Cosby can sue them for slander and financially destroy them. To suggest they are seeking notoriety given what they are risking is completely foolish. But so far, Mr. Cosby has not filed a single lawsuit against any of them even though his reputation is being destroyed. The very university where he earned that doctorate degree he's so very proud of has even severed ties with him, and yet he continues to say and do nothing in response.

[TimOhara123]

My point is most of the posters are saying Cosby is guilty, they can't prove it but yet he is guilty period. I am saying prove it or show one victim that can back it up and prove it. Really that isn't a hard thing to do if someone is guilty right, I mean no one can erase all evidence that something happened unless it didn't happen.

And at this point no one has even 1 thing to prove it do they.

[TimOhara123]

Originally Posted by LittleRickyII

Logic is not Mr. O'Hara's forte.



You raise a lot of excellent points. To this I would add that the risk these women (and that one man) are taking with their allegations is huge because Bill Cosby is a super wealthy individual who can afford all the very best lawyers in the country. If these people are lying, Bill Cosby can sue them for slander and financially destroy them. To suggest they are seeking notoriety given what they are risking is completely foolish. But so far, Mr. Cosby has not filed a single lawsuit against any of them even though his reputation is being destroyed. The very university where he earned that doctorate degree he's so very proud of has even severed ties with him, and yet he continues to say and do nothing in response.

Logic isn't trying to post 10 post about a single person Little Ricky is it, unless you dislike the person in the topic,

[Retro4Life]

Originally Posted by TimOhara123

My point is most of the posters are saying Cosby is guilty, they can't prove it but yet he is guilty period. I am saying prove it or show one victim that can back it up and prove it. Really that isn't a hard thing to do if someone is guilty right, I mean no one can erase all evidence that something happened unless it didn't happen.

And at this point no one has even 1 thing to prove it do they.

Please state, specifically, what 'proof' would be possible at this point. DNA? My guess is the clothing and people involved have been washed many, many times since these events. Witnesses? No, logically the alleged perpetrator would make sure there weren't any before he engaged in the alleged acts. Photos? Hardly. "Can you stop assaulting me for a second, please, while I snap a Polaroid of this event?" Video? In many cases, apparently, not even invented and still illogical.

So can you even theorize about a situation where no physical proof was available and yet the stories are still true? Because otherwise you are literally saying that every single one of these women (and the man) are lying. That's a LOT of lying.

Again you are working backward from the premise that Mr. Cosby could NEVER do these things. If a female friend of relative of yours would approach you with a story of being assaulted, would you seriously tell her that unless she could produce proof you would not believe her?

[cleverfun3000]

She's most likey get more sympathy if she were NOT galavanting aroung drunken high-rolling men in a bunny costume with a g-string the width of a thread. Perhaps if she wasn't contributing to the warped idea that sexy women are just men's playthings, maybe, just maybe someone sitting on a panel would take her cries of despair more seriously. Oh, and if she ever posed nude, IT'S A WRAP.

[Retro4Life]

Originally Posted by cleverfun3000

She's most likey get more sympathy if she were NOT galavanting aroung drunken high-rolling men in a bunny costume with a g-string the width of a thread. Perhaps if she wasn't contributing to the warped idea that sexy women are just men's playthings, maybe, just maybe someone sitting on a panel would take her cries of despair more seriously. Oh, and if she ever posed nude, IT'S A WRAP.

I'm going to choose to believe you really do not believe most of the contents of this post.

Because if I thought you did, I would seriously question your sanity.

No, no..wait. I know I will regret this but I must ask. Are you honestly saying that a woman who poses nude cannot, by definition, be a victim of rape? Yes or no.

[TimOhara123]

Originally Posted by Retro4Life

Please state, specifically, what 'proof' would be possible at this point. DNA? My guess is the clothing and people involved have been washed many, many times since these events. Witnesses? No, logically the alleged perpetrator would make sure there weren't any before he engaged in the alleged acts. Photos? Hardly. "Can you stop assaulting me for a second, please, while I snap a Polaroid of this event?" Video? In many cases, apparently, not even invented and still illogical.

So can you even theorize about a situation where no physical proof was available and yet the stories are still true? Because otherwise you are literally saying that every single one of these women (and the man) are lying. That's a LOT of lying.

Again you are working backward from the premise that Mr. Cosby could NEVER do these things. If a female friend of relative of yours would approach you with a story of being assaulted, would you seriously tell her that unless she could produce proof you would not believe her?

You mean not one of them could have went to the police or reported it, not one person, well now if you don't report it when it happened why believe them 40 years later. You know since not one of them did anything about it when it supposedly happened.

[LittleRickyII]

Originally Posted by cleverfun3000

She's most likey get more sympathy if she were NOT galavanting aroung drunken high-rolling men in a bunny costume with a g-string the width of a thread.

She wasn't "galavanting aroung drunken high-rolling men in a bunny costume" when this happened to her, she was at Bill Cosby's HOME for dinner WITH HIS FAMILY!

[isiahthomas]

LOL@Cleverfun3000 always dissing women hahahahahahahahahahahahaha. He always makes me laugh. That's sad that Bill Cosby tried to kiss this woman and touch her breasts while his wife and kids were at his home. This type of behavior by Bill is typical with most men when it comes to women. Men don't know how to handle themselves whenever cute women are around. It's sad that most men don't respect women and they only look at them as sex objects. I'm very disappointed in Bill. I know these women that are accusing him is saying this stuff too late but I believe these situations with Bill did happen. It's messed up that his reputation is bad now and these women have made him look bad but he has himself to blame. He's a pervert like most men when it comes to meeting women. I bet he's been to a strip club before hahahahahahahahahaha.