View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
The Flintstones links at Sitcoms Online / The Flintstones Photo Gallery
![]() Buy The Flintstones - The Complete Fifth Season on DVD |
![]() Buy The Flintstones - The Complete Sixth Season on DVD |
![]() Buy The Flintstones - The Complete Series (2012 Release) on DVD |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you prefer episodes with or without Pebbles and Bambam? | |||
| With Pebbles and Bambam |
|
14 | 48.28% |
| Without Pebbles and Bambam |
|
15 | 51.72% |
| Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mayfields pepsi man
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 13, 2000
Location: Alabama
Posts: 433
|
Do you prefer the episodes with or without Pebbles and Bambam personally I prefer them without.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MCR
Moderator
Forum 4000 Club Member Join Date: Jun 25, 2001
Posts: 4,008
|
I prefer them with! They were always so cute!
I loved when Fred thought that Pebbles and Bam Bam could talk! LoL! Feenster Girl |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Little Rascals Fan
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Mar 11, 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 309
|
Either or- meaning all the eps of the Flintstones are fine with me. However, Pebbles and Bam-Bam were a great addition to the show, so I couldn't imagine what it would be like it they were never "born."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
~~~~~
Forum 4000 Club Member
Join Date: Jan 10, 2002
Posts: 4,553
|
With. The show was better with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jan 03, 2002
Location: washington state
Posts: 475
|
Well the show was always great either with or without the kids,
I think that it was even better BEFORE Pebbles and Bam Bam 'cause in those eps. it was even more like The Honeymooners. Also since Fred and Barney were a couple of really BIG kids to begin with it really seems like the addition of Pebbles and Bam Bam only added a bit of cuteness that wasn't needed in the first place,after all they did have Dino... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Legend
Join Date: Nov 05, 2013
Posts: 35,339
|
I suppose with them,they didnt really hurt the show.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 20, 2003
Location: St. Louis Park, MN
Posts: 1,958
|
To me, the addition of Pebbles and Bamm Bamm changed the direction of the show. What started out as an adult prime time animated sitcom gradually metamorphosed into a kids show and that's what led The Flintstones to its demise in 1966. But fear not, the show went into reruns that fall and it got very high ratings. It also made more money for Hanna-Barbera and Screen Gems than the original ABC run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 09, 2019
Location: Tn
Posts: 634
|
Better question would be, with or without the great Gazoo?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
22 Years On Sitcoms
Moderator
Forum Legend Join Date: Aug 13, 2003
Location: Indy
Posts: 44,168
|
I'm in the minority, but I think Gazoo livened things up. I wish they'd brought him in sooner. Also, Korman's voice was perfect for that part.
I voted for P&B, BTW. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Forum King
Join Date: Feb 15, 2005
Posts: 133,383
|
with please! (Yabba Dabba Yes!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Forum Legend
Join Date: Nov 05, 2013
Posts: 35,339
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 28, 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,137
|
Warner Video: Bam-Bam asks Pebbles to marry him (From The Pebbles & Bamm-Bamm Show 1971) |
|
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Forum Star
Join Date: Oct 23, 2015
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 17,198
|
Without
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2018
Posts: 296
|
Without for me, I just never cared for them
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 01, 2007
Location: weston,wv
Posts: 1,389
|
Without.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|