View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Unsolved Mysteries Online Main Page / Message Board / Show History / Episode Guide (1987-2002) / Expanded Episode Guide #2 / Expanded Episode Guide #3 / Case Updates / Wiki / Official Site / Related Links
True Crime Shows Message Board / View Latest Threads in True Crime Shows / America's Most Wanted (AMW) / American Justice / City Confidential / Cold Case Files / Dateline / Disappeared / Forensic Files / 48 Hours / The Hunt with John Walsh / In Pursuit with John Walsh / Missing: Reward / On the Case with Paula Zahn / All Other Cases
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: May 03, 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 457
|
Let's say Stack's health remained tremendous AND that viewership stayed high, so the original UM was still on the air to this day.
I'm sure the graphics and nature of some stories would've modernized, although at its core, would've stayed true to the classic early UM, instead of turning into the nightmare that the Farina reboot was. Many people would argue it was already *beginning to* jump the shark as early as 1994 (I really liked the mid 90s period, even if some people do not) with more supernatural/miracle/UFO/ghost segments on constant reruns later on. However, I'm sure they would've covered kidnappings and murder mysteries no matter what technological changes were made. Even the lousier 90s/early 00s UM still was a million times better than the Farina version. Did anyone else find it cool (and somewhat hilarious) when Stack began giving internet addresses circa 1997? "At dub-ba-ya-dub-ba-ya-dub-ba-ya..." Knowing that, I can easily picture him in the last 4-5 years, having said. "If you own a smart-phone..." (two distinct words!)..."and possess any information about tonight's cases, tweet us at..."@OfficialUnsolvedMysteries", or visit our official Face-book page. Perhaps you..." ![]() Actually, on a somewhat serious note, even about that: The same way he had Keely on in the mid 90s sharing updates and hosting duties, and in the early 00s, the very last Updates often had another female voiceover, I could've definitely seen him having more correspondants and co-hosts, and he could've gone down to just doing the actual narration of stories, rather than being in the telecenter. Even if the guy's health stayed miraculous, he WOULD be 95 now and would want to wind down his work schedule! I honestly believe, even in his later years, his heart was always with the show and he genuinely cared about the people being profiled. That's the magic that kept it together for so long and why it simply wouldn't work with another host nearly as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Jun 01, 2009
Location: L.A.
Posts: 3,868
|
Quote:
Quote:
My all-time favorite angry moment has to be the DJ Radio Hoax update. You can see that he looks absolutely outraged that these fools wasted so many LE man hours and money (as well as UM's) for ratings, not to mention the false hope given to families of victims who thought the call might have been a break in their cases. I also agree that's part of the magic of the show. We have a host who is not only really good at hosting (in my humble opinion, no one tops him) but really cares about the subject matter. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: May 03, 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Feb 16, 2013
Location: Garner, NC
Posts: 78
|
I think that a lot of modern technology would have been incorporated into the show. Facebook, Twitter, texting in updates, official UM apps, a better unsolved.com, mailing lists, and probably an official YouTube page with additional scenes or expanded video information on the cases.
All of these things could still happen. UM needs a host, a return to the creepiness factor of the original version, and coverage of new cases. Compared to a lot of other shows, UM isn't terribly expensive to produce. I think it has a home on numerous cable networks. I don't know that it would ever return to what-used-to-be-over-the-air primetime cable, but I could see a major basic cable partner, like TBS or Lifetime, picking up a new version that had similar qualities to the original. So much potential, in the digital age of information now, is being lost. The potential to actively participate in a lot of these cases is MUCH greater today than it was in the 90s or early 2000s. Imagine this scenario: 1) See someone that looks familiar in your local Wal-Mart. 2) Pull out phone. Check UM app. 3) Sighting confirmed. It's a missing person from the show! 4) Text message and picture sent via smartphone to UM. 5) 30 seconds later your phone rings. "Hi, I'm an investigator with UM...." 6) On next week's episode --> UPDATE! Recently we profiled a case on this missing person.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Mar 07, 2001
Location: MA, United States
Posts: 3,367
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: May 03, 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
I honestly WOULD have liked the Farina version (or a similar reboot) if they'd covered new unsolved cases (rather than butchering the old ones). Having smartphone apps and social networking would've actually made solving modern cases and getting information/tips to the show much easier! Even though it's beating a dead horse, I couldn't agree more about how C/M is either out of touch or could care less how YT exposure in this era (2006+ and especially '08/09+ with a totally connected social media) could potentially help solve many of the older cases. The more new (and older) people hear about them, the better!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 20, 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 563
|
The two things they wouldn't retain (and to me were essential to the show) would be the film style and the music. Unfortunately they would "modernize" both (by taking out the atmosphere and making it like every other crime show out there now) and would take away a lot of what made the show work so well in the process.
|
|
__________________
“A thing may be too sad to be believed or too wicked to be believed or too good to be believed; but it cannot be too absurd to be believed in this planet of frogs and elephants, of crocodiles and cuttle-fish.” ― G.K. Chesterton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Jun 01, 2009
Location: L.A.
Posts: 3,868
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: May 03, 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
I like AMW too (more the early years) and John Walsh is a good guy who turned his personal tragedy into a great cause...but the "action movie style" pace would've never fit UM at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Aug 11, 2008
Location: Potterville
Posts: 33
|
Agree agree agree with everyone about how UM would be AMAZING in the era of social media. I think besides that, the show now would tell intriguing new stories in the areas of cybercrime(I can imagine a whole segment related to say the Silk Road before they were shut down) and modern day terrorism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
The Crawling Chaos
Forum Hawk
Join Date: Mar 11, 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 4
|
It would be fantastic if Unsolved Mysteries was still on, hosted by the wonderful Mr. Stack, in its original format! I agree that the latter 90s and onwards saw a changed tone, though I feel this was the trend at the time. With hugely popular sci-fi and supernatural shows dominating television such as the X-Files, Buffy, Outer Limits etc. on one hand and popular "sexy" crime shows like City Confidential or Murder 1 coming on to the scene, the show was just trying to keep up with ratings. Unfortunately I think if UM made it into contemporary times, it would have been changed so drastically it would lose a lot of the original charm and beauty we love so much (witness for example the popularity of the later episodes hosted by Mr. Farina).
On the plus side, interacting with technology would help catch criminals, but I feel the segments would highlight "sexier" and more sordid events, with the emphasis on titillation and attractive victims. I always liked that UM profiled cases featuring ordinary looking people, or less (supposedly) dramatic crimes, and think we would have lost this. Also I fear they would have tampered with Mr. Stack's presentation, not just in terms of subordinating him to an attractive young co-host to capture a new generation of viewers, but in terms of the writing and scenery. The original writing and way they filmed him really conjured up the hard-boiled detective image, I am afraid they would have tried to make the lingo more hip and the sets more action packed to keep up with the times. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Likes to live in a clean house
Moderator
Forum 4000 Club Member |
Frankly, I would loved to hear RS say, "Follow us on Twitter" or "Tweet us a tip at #UnsolvedMysteries."
I can imagine it in my head. And it's awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: May 03, 2011
Location: Circleville
Posts: 446
|
I bet a lot of people would be texting the show with tips!
I think there would be a lot more "solves", too, because of technology and social media, etc. It's pretty hard to do something and get away with it these days, with everything being electronic and video cameras pretty much everywhere. Disappearing would be pretty hard to do, too. Fingerprints in a database, facial recognition software, computerized driver's licenses and identification, cell phone tracking, video cameras everywhere, social media....it's crazy. If UM was still on right now, and Robert Stack was looking for you, you'd better leave the planet or you'll probably be found by tomorrow. I also hope that UM would stick to covering stories that need covering and that are maybe a bit obscure. Every crime show known to man has covered The Zodiac, and while UM did pick some higher profile cases, they also brought to light other cases that I would never have heard of....like Donald Kemp, Anthonette Cayedito, Wendy Camp, Judith Hyams, Bonnie Wilder (hee hee! @ Bonnie), and countless others. I hope they would stick to those types of segment rather than glamourizing the show to get ratings. Not only did this add a spookiness because these crimes were REAL and I had no idea of them, it also helped lesser-known cases gain exposure and potentially bring some sort of closure/result for the victims and families. I hated (and still hate) the ghost segments, so I hope selecting those segments would come to an end lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Jun 19, 2008
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 5,156
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
"Why is she lying?, it makes me wonder. What is she hiding?, it makes me wonder." Go Vols! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
I love a mystery
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 19, 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,287
|
Quote:
I do think they would keep profiling stories that today's media wouldn't even consider touching. UM covered cases that weren't always the missing pretty, upscale suburban housewife or college student. The variety was always a huge bonus. They probably would scale back on the supernatural segments and missing legends, but I think mysteries like that missing plane out of Malaysia would still be a go. Personally, I think CM should just give in, stop being so stubborn and stingy and let the forbidden sites start airing the old cases again. It gives them new exposure and could lead to a solve. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
1) How do I contact Unsolved Mysteries with information
on segments?
If you any information on cases, you can contact them via:
Website: www.unsolved.com
Contact form on official Unsolved Mysteries site
Please note that their old mailing address and 1-800 phone number no longer work.
2) Where can I watch Unsolved Mysteries? Unsolved Mysteries is available for streaming on Amazon Video and YouTube.