View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Unsolved Mysteries Online Main Page / Message Board / Show History / Episode Guide (1987-2002) / Expanded Episode Guide #2 / Expanded Episode Guide #3 / Case Updates / Wiki / Official Site / Related Links
True Crime Shows Message Board / View Latest Threads in True Crime Shows / America's Most Wanted (AMW) / American Justice / City Confidential / Cold Case Files / Dateline / Disappeared / Forensic Files / 48 Hours / The Hunt with John Walsh / In Pursuit with John Walsh / Missing: Reward / On the Case with Paula Zahn / All Other Cases
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Apr 11, 2006
Location: Wendy's salad bar
Posts: 7,030
|
In another case of "Oh crap, I missed it except for the last few minutes", On the Case with PAULA ZAHN aired a 1 hour episode on this case. I would be VERY interested in seeing this and hope they rerun it because I have never seen the full case on UM, only the update. I'm still confused as to how and when this show aired and figured it may have been filmed for the Final Appeal series.
But...in the few minutes I saw, there were some interesting nuggets of info I gleaned: -John Purvis (probably with the help of his family) filed a lawsuit and was awarded a million dollars for wrongful conviction. -In another example of "only a stupid Florida jury could come to that decision", a jury decided that Shane's murder was "an accident" and considered that while determining the sentences for Paul Hamwi and Paul Serio. Boo, hiss! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Mar 07, 2001
Location: MA, United States
Posts: 3,367
|
According to the ID schedule, it is scheduled to be rerun this Saturday (October 5) at 2:00 pm, Eastern Time. The episode is titled "A Call For Justice."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Forum 4000 Club Member
Join Date: Dec 17, 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,261
|
I just watched the show. I had hoped they would show a recent interview with Purvis (I assume he's still alive) but they just showed a picture. It was so disappointing that the one who actually killed Susan never got any jail time since they had to have his testimony to convict Paul Hamwi. One thing they mentioned that UM never did was the killer for hire had said from the beginning he couldn't kill a child so Paul Hamwi was supposed to call a friend of Susan's to go check on them and thus find the baby alive. He never called anyone so apparently he wanted his daughter to die that horrible way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 14, 2010
Posts: 1,874
|
I was always under the impression that the full segment about the John Purvis case never aired. Since Purvis unexpectedly wound up being released in between the filming of the segment and the airing, UM just showed a truncated version of the story with the update. Since the case was solved, I'm not sure they ever bothered to air the full version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Mar 07, 2001
Location: MA, United States
Posts: 3,367
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Apr 11, 2006
Location: Wendy's salad bar
Posts: 7,030
|
ah, thank you for that info Kane.
I recall mentioning about how Hamwi was supposed to have prevented Shane's death, but never did. I found that to be particularly cruel on his part to let his own daughter die in such a horrible fashion. I wish him the worst. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Apr 11, 2006
Location: Wendy's salad bar
Posts: 7,030
|
The episode talked about John's life in prison. As you can imagine, for someone with schizophrenia, and being a non-criminal put in amongst a lot of hardened criminals, his life wasn't very pleasant for those years. Talked about how he got skin cancer because he would stay out for so long and his mother wasn't around to tell him to go inside, and how his teeth rotted because his mother wasn't around to tell him to brush his teeth. Also said how John would be at the end of a line of 30 people waiting to use the phone, and when he would make it to the front of the line, he was bullied back to the end of the line before getting to use the phone, a process that was repeated several times in one setting. But they did say that John always remained a positive person despite the cruel hand that had been dealt to him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Apr 11, 2006
Location: Wendy's salad bar
Posts: 7,030
|
The UM segment (or update) never delved into how Serio and Beckett (I think his name was) got in the house. I had always assumed they broke into the house, but the episode revealed that Serio and Beckett concoted a ruse in which they went to Susan's house pretending to have information that would help Susan Hamwi in her dealings with her ex-husband. Susan recognized them as acquaintances of her ex and let them in the house. She turned around to get them a glass of water when they beat, choked and stabbed her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Jun 01, 2009
Location: L.A.
Posts: 3,868
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 27, 2002
Posts: 1,569
|
Quote:
http://www.unsolvedmysteriestelevision.com/ As you can see the case of John Purvis is not among them. I remember speaking with JS once and he pointed out that there were an inordinate amount of "Final Appeal" cases included on UM in the months after the "Final Appeal" spinoff was cancelled. His gauge on the situation and I believe he is right is that a ton of FA segments were ordered for the spinoff but ultimately were never aired because the spinoff ended so quickly. A lot of these migrated over to "Unsolved Mysteries" but in the case of John Purvis, his case just never made air. There is also obviously a question as to whether the case of Thomas Drake was ever aired anywhere prior to it's inclusion on the Farina broadcasts. PS: For those who might not be aware, one possible reason that Purvis' case was never aired is because he was released from prison before his case ever had a chance to make air. The UM spinoff "Final Appeal" aired in the autumn of 1992 and was cancelled before year's end. Purvis was released from prison in January of 1993 before a lot of the unaired FA segments were absorbed into UM broadcasts. So speculation is that UM chose to just air an update to the case, possibly out of respect to the Purvis family, if nothing else (the audience would not be familiar with his plight, his case having never been aired) detailing Purvis' release from prison. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Jun 19, 2008
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 5,156
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
"Why is she lying?, it makes me wonder. What is she hiding?, it makes me wonder." Go Vols! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Jun 19, 2008
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 5,156
|
Quote:
Are there examples of FA episodes that later were spliced into UM reruns? I know there was a UM segment on Jeffrey MacDonald, but it seems there was also a FA episode as well. Is the segment just the edited-down FA episode shown within a UM episode? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 27, 2002
Posts: 1,569
|
Quote:
Quote:
To answer your second question, yes all of the FA segments whether it be the aforementioned MacDonald segment or any of the FA segments spliced into the Farina episodes have been edited from their original broadcast form. You have to remember that the "Final Appeal" spinoff was itself a one hour television program and featured only one appellant per week so that left room to include a great deal of information on the appellant they were profiling that particular week. When these FA segments were later spliced/absorbed into UM they were edited somewhat in order to feature them within a sixty minute episode (give or take commercial breaks) of UM which almost always featured several segments per episode. In that vein, it is also likely that the cases originally produced for the spinoff "Final Appeal", that were absorbed into the 1993 season of UM were also likely edited somewhat for the same reason I mentioned above. So when we are watching for instance the case of Michael Lloyd Self we are likely not watching the case as it was originally intended to be broadcast as part of the "Final Appeal" spinoff. The reason being is that when the decision was made to air that case on UM after "Final Appeal" was cancelled, there would've needed to have been some editing done to it, in order to absorb it into a sixty minute UM broadcast which would likely feature several other cases within that time slot. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Apr 11, 2006
Location: Wendy's salad bar
Posts: 7,030
|
Well actually, Dr. Jeffrey McDonald was doubled up with Port Chicago Mutiny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Jun 19, 2008
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 5,156
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
1) How do I contact Unsolved Mysteries with information
on segments?
If you any information on cases, you can contact them via:
Website: www.unsolved.com
Contact form on official Unsolved Mysteries site
Please note that their old mailing address and 1-800 phone number no longer work.
2) Where can I watch Unsolved Mysteries? Unsolved Mysteries is available for streaming on Amazon Video and YouTube.