New look into Sabrina Aisenberg case - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

1990 UM fan · 10-20-2012, 05:07 AM

Looks like Nancy Grace is taking on this case:

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2012/10...race-mysteries

There's a few more links on her website's pages pertaining to Sabrina.

Killarney Rose · 10-20-2012, 10:14 AM

I've always been on the fence about this one. Depending on which version you watch on TV and the spin put on it.

I sure don't like nancy Grace. She is a hateful spiteful, witch with a B.

If these parents are innocent I hate to see her stirring up trouble for them. _ that said w/o looking at the links- in a hurry will check them later.

Tighthead · 10-20-2012, 11:23 AM

I bet Nancy is approaching this with an open mind. I recall her being dead wrong in the Elizabeth Smart case, but not humbled.

NG notwithstanding, this is a fascinating case. Somewhat similar to JBR.

sharonite · 10-20-2012, 11:58 AM

Can't stand Nancy Grace (let's face it, she would have fried Patricia Stallings), but glad this case is getting a second look. Defies all easy explanations, IMO.

tamanshud · 10-20-2012, 12:32 PM

I watched, just a rehash of the same information. Or, did I miss something?

1990 UM fan · 10-20-2012, 01:48 PM

Don't judge her so soon. I recall once that one of her viewers saw a missing girl that was featured on her show and they caught the guy that abducted the girl (and they say Nancy is no good. I beg to differ).

FarinaforBrkfast · 10-21-2012, 12:18 AM

This case is a weird one. I strongly feel that the Aisenbergs are responsible for her disappearance. There are just too many things pointing in their direction and away from an intruder. (lack of evidence, the dog didn't bark etc.)

Big3sCompanyFan · 10-21-2012, 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FarinaforBrkfast

This case is a weird one. I strongly feel that the Aisenbergs are responsible for her disappearance. There are just too many things pointing in their direction and away from an intruder. (lack of evidence, the dog didn't bark etc.)

The baby has never been found??

Killarney Rose · 10-21-2012, 09:33 AM

Never. Lots of circumstantial evidence, but no proof of the parents doing something.

I've seen this case presented both ways- an intruder took her, the parents did it. And each time, you want to believe it is the way you are being told. A real puzzler.

TracyLynnS · 10-21-2012, 09:58 AM

I would be a lot more willing to believe the parents did it if the authorities hadn't bugged their house, then went on to tell the judge all about how they had the parents on tape talking about taking cocaine and killing the baby.

When the judge heard those tapes, (and I heard some of them too when this info was on TV) he heard a bunch of static, the television, and almost no decipherable conversation. IIRC, he was disgusted with this "evidence" and made it known.

If the parents are guilty, that whole debacle probably ruined any chances of bringing a believable prosecution.

pardilia · 10-21-2012, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1990 UM fan

Don't judge her so soon. I recall once that one of her viewers saw a missing girl that was featured on her show and they caught the guy that abducted the girl (and they say Nancy is no good. I beg to differ).

What does that have to do with NG's guilty before innocent style of journalism? She's always at the ready to call the rest of the villagers to storm the castle with their torches and pitchforks before all the facts are in. It's awful. Not to mention that the case you mention, Brittany Mae Smith, was carried on more than just NG's show.

I'm all for someone bringing these cold cases back into the light of day, but I can't stand NG's style of journalism either. I think she is going to end up doing more harm than good in the long run as people are already growing tired of listening to her harp on about cases. Soon it won't matter what she says because people will see that it's her and not bother watching/listening/reading because of it.

That said, I'm glad she's bringing another cold case back into the spotlight. I just wish there was someone else doing the same work that NG does with a bit more impartiality and class.

Killarney Rose · 10-21-2012, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idyla

What does that have to do with NG's guilty before innocent style of journalism? She's always at the ready to call the rest of the villagers to storm the castle with their torches and pitchforks before all the facts are in. It's awful. Not to mention that the case you mention, Brittany Mae Smith, was carried on more than just NG's show.

I'm all for someone bringing these cold cases back into the light of day, but I can't stand NG's style of journalism either. I think she is going to end up doing more harm than good in the long run as people are already growing tired of listening to her harp on about cases. Soon it won't matter what she says because people will see that it's her and not bother watching/listening/reading because of it.

That said, I'm glad she's bringing another cold case back into the spotlight. I just wish there was someone else doing the same work that NG does with a bit more impartiality and class.

Mashing your "like" button! Very well put- my feelings about NG exactly!

Big3sCompanyFan · 10-21-2012, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Killarney Rose

Never. Lots of circumstantial evidence, but no proof of the parents doing something.

I've seen this case presented both ways- an intruder took her, the parents did it. And each time, you want to believe it is the way you are being told. A real puzzler.

If the parents did it they must've killed her.

MegtheEgg86 · 10-21-2012, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idyla

What does that have to do with NG's guilty before innocent style of journalism? She's always at the ready to call the rest of the villagers to storm the castle with their torches and pitchforks before all the facts are in. It's awful. Not to mention that the case you mention, Brittany Mae Smith, was carried on more than just NG's show.

I'm all for someone bringing these cold cases back into the light of day, but I can't stand NG's style of journalism either. I think she is going to end up doing more harm than good in the long run as people are already growing tired of listening to her harp on about cases. Soon it won't matter what she says because people will see that it's her and not bother watching/listening/reading because of it.

That said, I'm glad she's bringing another cold case back into the spotlight. I just wish there was someone else doing the same work that NG does with a bit more impartiality and class.

I third that.

Jediknight1823 · 10-22-2012, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tighthead

I bet Nancy is approaching this with an open mind. I recall her being dead wrong in the Elizabeth Smart case, but not humbled.

And let's not forget the Duke Lacrosse case.

10-20-2012, 05:07 AM	#1
1990 UM fan Unsolved Mysteries fanatic Senior Member Join Date: Jul 14, 2011 Location: United States Posts: 2,510	New look into Sabrina Aisenberg case Looks like Nancy Grace is taking on this case: http://www.hlntv.com/article/2012/10...race-mysteries There's a few more links on her website's pages pertaining to Sabrina.
	__________________ Join my Unsolved Mysteries page (Facebook): http://www.facebook.com/pages/Unsolv...899616?sk=wall

10-20-2012, 10:14 AM	#2
Killarney Rose Member Forum Regular Join Date: Jul 24, 2010 Location: AL Posts: 656	I've always been on the fence about this one. Depending on which version you watch on TV and the spin put on it. I sure don't like nancy Grace. She is a hateful spiteful, witch with a B. If these parents are innocent I hate to see her stirring up trouble for them. _ that said w/o looking at the links- in a hurry will check them later.

10-20-2012, 11:23 AM	#3
Tighthead Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Aug 15, 2006 Posts: 199	I bet Nancy is approaching this with an open mind. I recall her being dead wrong in the Elizabeth Smart case, but not humbled. NG notwithstanding, this is a fascinating case. Somewhat similar to JBR.

10-20-2012, 11:58 AM	#4
sharonite Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Dec 27, 2009 Posts: 157	Can't stand Nancy Grace (let's face it, she would have fried Patricia Stallings), but glad this case is getting a second look. Defies all easy explanations, IMO.

10-20-2012, 12:32 PM	#5
tamanshud Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Sep 30, 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 93	I watched, just a rehash of the same information. Or, did I miss something?

10-20-2012, 01:48 PM	#6
1990 UM fan Unsolved Mysteries fanatic Senior Member Join Date: Jul 14, 2011 Location: United States Posts: 2,510	Don't judge her so soon. I recall once that one of her viewers saw a missing girl that was featured on her show and they caught the guy that abducted the girl (and they say Nancy is no good. I beg to differ).

10-21-2012, 12:18 AM	#7
FarinaforBrkfast Stack of Pancakes, Both Good! Occasional Poster Join Date: Jan 16, 2012 Posts: 64	This case is a weird one. I strongly feel that the Aisenbergs are responsible for her disappearance. There are just too many things pointing in their direction and away from an intruder. (lack of evidence, the dog didn't bark etc.)

10-21-2012, 09:33 AM	#9
Killarney Rose Member Forum Regular Join Date: Jul 24, 2010 Location: AL Posts: 656	Never. Lots of circumstantial evidence, but no proof of the parents doing something. I've seen this case presented both ways- an intruder took her, the parents did it. And each time, you want to believe it is the way you are being told. A real puzzler.

10-21-2012, 09:58 AM	#10
TracyLynnS Don't Look Up Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 07, 2009 Posts: 3,107	I would be a lot more willing to believe the parents did it if the authorities hadn't bugged their house, then went on to tell the judge all about how they had the parents on tape talking about taking cocaine and killing the baby. When the judge heard those tapes, (and I heard some of them too when this info was on TV) he heard a bunch of static, the television, and almost no decipherable conversation. IIRC, he was disgusted with this "evidence" and made it known. If the parents are guilty, that whole debacle probably ruined any chances of bringing a believable prosecution.