View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Good Times links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / Good Times Photo Gallery
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Remember in the ep "dinner party" james said they had 35 extra dollars left over and told florida to do something SILLY with the money? Why do that when you can save? James was in no position to spend money in a silly way especially when he was the only one working.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 04, 2000
Location: New York, New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 10,857
|
Because they rarely ever get the chance to do or say that. LOL. In their eyes, they know how to survive. I figure they wanted to celebrate that found money. LOL.
|
|
__________________
Check out my my "It's A Living" Facebook Fanpage!!! https://m.facebook.com/groups/107208...&source=result |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
Any extra I find I dump in the bank-lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 04, 2000
Location: New York, New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 10,857
|
I don't think they had the chance to splurge, though. Maybe that's what he wanted to do. He could have given it to Thelma and told her to tell her date that he's "going out with a rich man's daughter" or better yet, put it to "them actin' and dancin' lessons" for Thelma. LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
It sounded like a george jefferson line.........."go head weezy and spend this money on something silly, i can afford it." LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jul 20, 2011
Posts: 258
|
That's what James should have done when he had that robbery money. Instead of telling Flo he kept $2,000, he could have told her each month, "Hey baby, we have $35 extra. Go spend it on something silly." That could have gone on for 57 months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: May 09, 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22
|
I think when you bust your butt just to put food on the table and pay your bills, you NEED to splurge once in a while just to keep your sanity. Besides, James so himself as the sole provider for the family and I think part of that isn't just paying bills, but making sure your family is happy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
Since he was the only income in the household which was small, he should have put whatever left over money in a emergency bank account. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: May 09, 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 24
|
There would have been a limit to how much they could have in the bank, low income housing, so it wouldn't have helped them build an account.
Also, as others have stated, they rather had the opportunity to splurge. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,087
|
Quote:
They should have only been splurging once a year lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jul 20, 2011
Posts: 258
|
The family (post James) won the lotto and put that $2500 they won in the bank so, the reason being that they lived in low-income housing as a reason for not having a bank account doesn't seem to apply. If they could put that amount in the bank, then James could have had a bank account and put money away or just put it in a shoebox for whenever a time came up when they needed money.
Also, the family tried to obtain a loan from the bank at one time post James. It was Keith, Thelma, Michael, Flo and JJ. The fact they lived in the projects and living in low-income housing didn't seem to keep them from obtaining that loan. It was fhe fact there was not one person with a full-time job was the reason they couldn't get the loan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: May 09, 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 24
|
They should have only splurged "once a year" but when people aren't used to having extras then it's hard not to pick up a few things when they can.
It's also true that the take home money of blue collar workers is known as "disposable income" and is what keeps/kept the economy going. Wealthy people invest while working people spend money at the drugstore, movies, buying things in malls, etc. I'd forgotten about the lottery episode. Some of it would have went for taxes but there still would have had to have been a limit to their assets to qualify for low income housing. The loan episode was for a house out of the projects so they wouldn't have worried about being kicked out of the ghetto for that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jul 20, 2011
Posts: 258
|
Willona seemed to make a pretty decent living, had a nice apartment and nice wardrobe. She was the head buyer at the boutique, receiving alimony according to her comment in one episode and yet, she was living in a low-income apartment. Why? She had no kids and she certainly didn't seem to be qualified for low-income.
As for the loan episode, each one of them was working at a part-time job so, I don't know what limits, if any, they had for living in the projects. They had to be earning quite a good sum if they were looking into buying a home where the mortgage would be equal to or more than the rent they were paying in the projects on top of property taxes and other expenses that come with owning a home. I am guessing if Willona could live there in the projects, there was no limit on what they could earn or have as assets in order to live there. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|