View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Chit Chat - Main Board / Games / Movies / Music / Sports / Video Games / Chit Chat - Classic / View Latest Threads in All Chit Chat Boards
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Cheers!
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 14, 2005
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 11,061
|
LOS ANGELES – "Star Trek" beamed itself up to the top of the box office, earning $76.5 million in its opening weekend.
Paramount Pictures had estimated that the movie would make about $50 million for the weekend, but figured that strong reviews helped carry it to the bigger opening. Director J.J. Abrams' reboot of the beloved sci-fi franchise made $72.5 million from Friday through Sunday, plus $4 million just in pre-midnight screenings Thursday, the studio said Saturday. That cumulative figure includes a record $8.2 million in IMAX showings. "Star Trek," which reveals the back stories of Capt. Kirk, Mr. Spock and the rest of the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise, is an unusual blockbuster that pleased critics, too, receiving 96 percent positive reviews on the Rotten Tomatoes Web site. "Last year 'The Dark Knight' and 'Iron Man' both were embraced by critics as incredible filmmaking as well as big action-adventure movies. This one has been even better reviewed," said Paramount vice chairman Rob Moore. "You look at the level of critical response and the audience reaction, we definitely feel like the movie is set to play into Memorial Day and into the summer." Moore said he expected the movie, which had a $140 million budget, should gross over $200 million total this summer, even with competition like "Terminator: Salvation" coming on May 21 and "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" arriving in theaters July 15. Abrams got it right, he said, by appealing to both hardcore "Star Trek" fans as well as moviegoers who may not have been familiar with the 1960s television series and the many movies and TV spin-offs it spawned. It stars Chris Pine as Kirk and Zachary Quinto as Spock, and features an appearance by Leonard Nimoy as an older version of the half-Vulcan, half-human Spock. "It just shows you how talented he is and what a great movie he made," Moore said. "Star Trek" also beat the $6.3 million record "The Dark Knight" set in its opening weekend on IMAX screens last year. "The DNA of this movie and the DNA of the `Star Trek' franchise work perfectly together and are very much a complement to what IMAX has accomplished," said Greg Foster, chairman and president of IMAX Filmed Entertainment. "IMAX was a company that had a sort of older-school, older-fashioned approach to things and we hipped it up and reinvented ourselves, if you will. That's precisely what J.J. Abrams and Paramount did with 'Star Trek.'" The fact that the "Star Trek" haul improved from $26.8 million on Friday to $27.4 million on Saturday is a good sign, said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com. "Sometimes you will see a movie drop big-time," Dergarabedian said. "What this 'Star Trek' is going to have is legs, a rare commodity in this world where every week there's a new blockbuster." As expected, last week's top film, "X-Men Origins: Wolverine," came in at No. 2 with $27 million. The prequel to the "X-Men" franchise, starring Hugh Jackman as the mutant who slices and dices his enemies with his metal claws, has made nearly $129.6 million in two weeks. "It's the same weekend drop as ('X-Men: The Last Stand'), the last one. That tends to be what fan-based movies do," said Chris Aronson, senior vice president of domestic distribution for 20th Century Fox. "To have $130 million in the first 10 days is sensational. We think we withstood the attack of 'Star Trek,' if you will, and will settle into a long, successful run." The week's other new wide release, the stoner comedy "Next Day Air," came in at sixth place with $4 million. Weekend Box Office Estimates (U.S.) This Wk Last Wk Title Dist. Weekend Gross Cumulative Gross Rlse Wks # of Theaters 1 - Star Trek Paramount Pictures $72,500,000 $76,500,000 1 3849 2 1 X-Men Origins: Wolverine 20th Century Fox Distribution $27,000,000 $129,624,000 2 4102 3 2 Ghosts of Girlfriends Past Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution $10,450,000 $30,246,000 2 3175 4 3 Obsessed Sony Pictures Releasing $6,600,000 $56,247,000 3 2602 5 4 17 Again Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution $4,405,000 $54,167,000 4 2903 6 - Next Day Air Summit Entertainment, LLC $4,000,000 $4,000,000 1 1138 7 6 The Soloist Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks, Universal Pictures $3,605,000 $23,501,000 3 2090 8 5 Monsters vs. Aliens Paramount Pictures $3,379,000 $186,892,000 7 2185 9 7 Earth Disneynature $2,488,000 $26,086,000 3 1794 10 8 Hannah Montana The Movie Buena Vista Pictures Distribution $2,414,000 $74,083,000 5 2301 11 9 Fighting Universal Pictures $2,146,000 $20,589,000 3 1933 12 10 State of Play Universal Pictures $1,988,000 $34,056,000 4 1541 |
|
__________________
www.facebook.com/comedyfreak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Freakshow
Moderator
Forum Icon Join Date: Feb 01, 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 57,174
|
$4 million from the "expected" $80 million isn't bad at all.
Star Trek was great. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Cheers!
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 14, 2005
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 11,061
|
Yes it was!! I'd like to see it again. I thought you would have posted the totals already, LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Rachel Berry
Forum Celebrity
Join Date: Feb 28, 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 23,254
|
I'm happy that the film is doing so well, but I still can't bring myself to see it. I've become one of those people who out right refused the ever watch TNG because it didn't have the original cast.
For my taste, you can't have Kirk and Spock unless they are being played by William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy. I'm glad that a lot of people are enjoying the film though. If nothing else, it proves that Star Trek still has plenty of life left in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Freakshow
Moderator
Forum Icon Join Date: Feb 01, 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 57,174
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Cheers!
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 14, 2005
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 11,061
|
Abrams did so much justice to the original, he'd be my pick as director if they were ever to do another Lost In Space movie, which they won't since the last one bombed big time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Cheers!
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 14, 2005
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 11,061
|
Quote:
I couldn't wait to post it I was so excited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Retired
Eternal Member
![]() Forum Veteran Join Date: Dec 10, 2006
Posts: 7,520
|
I was expecting maybe $100 million--maybe I was overzealous
I haven't seen it, but I guess I will once it hits DVD.Maybe the success of this will have others rethinking about JJ Abrams doing their franchise re-dos
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Cheers!
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 14, 2005
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 11,061
|
He certainly seems to know what he's doing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
It is Green
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 28, 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,476
|
I have seen it twice already and plan to see it a few more times. I loved it!!!!
This is great about the box office. It bodes well for a sequel.
|
|
__________________
"God be gracious to us and bless us..." Psalm 67:1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Freakshow
Moderator
Forum Icon Join Date: Feb 01, 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 57,174
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Retired
Eternal Member
![]() Forum Veteran Join Date: Dec 10, 2006
Posts: 7,520
|
This will already go on to be the most successful Star Trek movie so far. (Not counting previous films' b.o, readjusted for inflation, though).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Apr 01, 2008
Posts: 6,094
|
The movie was well made and will also do well in DVD sales.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|