View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Unsolved Mysteries Online Main Page / Message Board / Show History / Episode Guide (1987-2002) / Expanded Episode Guide #2 / Expanded Episode Guide #3 / Case Updates / Wiki / Official Site / Related Links
True Crime Shows Message Board / View Latest Threads in True Crime Shows / America's Most Wanted (AMW) / American Justice / City Confidential / Cold Case Files / Dateline / Disappeared / Forensic Files / 48 Hours / The Hunt with John Walsh / In Pursuit with John Walsh / Missing: Reward / On the Case with Paula Zahn / All Other Cases
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Oct 14, 2008
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 73
|
Hey everyone I've been catching up on tons of Tivo'd UM episodes and I just ran across this case. I remember this one from when I was a kid and it always freaked me out. I felt so sad for the young woman who was probably subjected to some pretty awful things. Well, it gave me great joy to see that they found the guy responsible.
However, what's weird about the update is that it seems to totally go against the eye witnesses account of the three white trashy looking guys pounding on his car and telling him to leave the camp site. What I'm wondering is if UM decides to air cases even though they know that some of the vital information is being held by the police who tell UM not to mention anything they are working on? Make sense? I've noticed this with a few cases where it seems UM has a story they want to tell, but it's not necessarily accurate, given some of the sensitive clues or evidence the police may not want mentioned on the air. I also noticed that Spike has used clips from this cases reenactment on another case about a model disappearing. Weird. Anyway, glad this case was solved! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jun 07, 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 310
|
I just watched this segment and I am wondering what was up with that "witness"? Did he really see something? Was he just trying to get attention? If he did see something why wouldn't you go to the police? He's just as bad as that couple on another episode that heard screams coming from a neighboring apartment and did nothing, then the girl there was later found dead. Maybe I am too cautious, but if I saw something weird I'd call the cops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Jan 25, 2009
Location: california
Posts: 20
|
The eyewitness who saw the weirdos and the beautiful girl seemed believable and sincere about what he saw and remorse for not doing anything. At the same time he insisted that Kimberly was the girl he saw and obviously she wasn't.
This case has a strange outcome because I thought the same "photographer" who killed the other model also killed Pandilios. The phone call and the outdoor shoot at the Angeles Forest all fits. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
1) How do I contact Unsolved Mysteries with information
on segments?
If you any information on cases, you can contact them via:
Website: www.unsolved.com
Contact form on official Unsolved Mysteries site
Please note that their old mailing address and 1-800 phone number no longer work.
2) Where can I watch Unsolved Mysteries? Unsolved Mysteries is available for streaming on Amazon Video and YouTube.