MPAA study finds movies cost more than ever: Ticket buyers beware!!! - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Brian Damage · 03-07-2008, 12:10 PM

In advance of the movie industry's annual ShoWest gathering in Las Vegas next week, the Motion Picture Association of America has released its Theatrical Market Statistics Report for 2007, which details all the basic facts and figures of the film business. The big news is that the total cost of making and releasing a movie is at an all-time high: Last year, Hollywood studios spent $70.8 million to produce the average release and $35.9 mil to market it — a whopping $106.6 mil total price tag. (The previous high was $105.8 mil in 2003.) The sums for what the MPAA calls "subsidiaries/affiliates" (ie. specialty divisions like Fox Searchlight and Miramax) saw an even bigger jump: It cost $74.8 mil to make and market the typical indie movie, up from a previous high of $62 mil in 2003. Meanwhile, the average cost of a movie ticket rose 5 percent to $6.88, the largest such leap in seven years. And remember, we're talking averages here — the cost of a standard summer blockbuster, like a Pirates of the Caribbean movie, is much higher (usually well north of $200 mil), and theater admissions in major metropolitan areas tend to cost a whole lot more.

What does all this mean for consumers? Simple: Even more blockbuster-type releases! (And even fewer mid-range movies like Michael Clayton.) After all, while Hollywood execs may cringe at the thought that their costs are skyrocketing, they can comfort themselves in knowing that that their product appears to be increasing in popularity: The MPAA report also notes that 2007 saw nine more $100 mil grossers than the year before; a slight uptick in the overall number of tickets sold; a boost in the combined revenues of all hit summer movies; a 5.4 percent increase in domestic box office receipts ($9.63 billion); and a record total of $26.72 billion in worldwide theatrical grosses. So although movies have gotten more expensive, they're raking in more dough. Big movies are what's working right now...right?

Well, there are a few caveats here. For one thing, even as 2007's global grosses saw a 4.9 percent rise over the previous year, combined production and marketing costs rose a greater 6.3 percent. Furthermore, the domestic movie marketplace lost 200 million ticket buyers between 2002 and 2007. Then there's the always pesky (and often forgotten) fact that studios have to turn over a huge chunk of gross revenues to theater owners and marquee stars. And don't think all the bloated numbers means that Hollywood is putting out more movies than ever, because it's not: 2007 boasted the smallest number of studio releases (179) of any year this decade. It all goes to show that power players in the business shouldn't be so quick to congratulate themselves — but since they're not likely to stop, moviegoers should expect to settle in for much, much more of the same.

http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/...find.html#more

Ireneparalegal · 03-07-2008, 09:20 PM

It took a study to figure out ticket buyers pay more for movie tickets? And that studios spend more money to make movies?

How insane. With the price of some celebs to appear in a movie it is a no-brainer that the consumer ends up paying in the end to watch an actor do his/her job for $15 million dollars.

PlayOn · 03-08-2008, 01:36 AM

I seriously hope the taxpayers of America aren't paying for these studies.

03-07-2008, 12:10 PM	#1
Brian Damage I'm Rich Bitch Forum Icon Join Date: Feb 03, 2002 Location: What Ain't No Country I Ever Heard Of...They Speak English in What? Posts: 63,107	MPAA study finds movies cost more than ever: Ticket buyers beware!!! In advance of the movie industry's annual ShoWest gathering in Las Vegas next week, the Motion Picture Association of America has released its Theatrical Market Statistics Report for 2007, which details all the basic facts and figures of the film business. The big news is that the total cost of making and releasing a movie is at an all-time high: Last year, Hollywood studios spent $70.8 million to produce the average release and $35.9 mil to market it — a whopping $106.6 mil total price tag. (The previous high was $105.8 mil in 2003.) The sums for what the MPAA calls "subsidiaries/affiliates" (ie. specialty divisions like Fox Searchlight and Miramax) saw an even bigger jump: It cost $74.8 mil to make and market the typical indie movie, up from a previous high of $62 mil in 2003. Meanwhile, the average cost of a movie ticket rose 5 percent to $6.88, the largest such leap in seven years. And remember, we're talking averages here — the cost of a standard summer blockbuster, like a Pirates of the Caribbean movie, is much higher (usually well north of $200 mil), and theater admissions in major metropolitan areas tend to cost a whole lot more. What does all this mean for consumers? Simple: Even more blockbuster-type releases! (And even fewer mid-range movies like Michael Clayton.) After all, while Hollywood execs may cringe at the thought that their costs are skyrocketing, they can comfort themselves in knowing that that their product appears to be increasing in popularity: The MPAA report also notes that 2007 saw nine more $100 mil grossers than the year before; a slight uptick in the overall number of tickets sold; a boost in the combined revenues of all hit summer movies; a 5.4 percent increase in domestic box office receipts ($9.63 billion); and a record total of $26.72 billion in worldwide theatrical grosses. So although movies have gotten more expensive, they're raking in more dough. Big movies are what's working right now...right? Well, there are a few caveats here. For one thing, even as 2007's global grosses saw a 4.9 percent rise over the previous year, combined production and marketing costs rose a greater 6.3 percent. Furthermore, the domestic movie marketplace lost 200 million ticket buyers between 2002 and 2007. Then there's the always pesky (and often forgotten) fact that studios have to turn over a huge chunk of gross revenues to theater owners and marquee stars. And don't think all the bloated numbers means that Hollywood is putting out more movies than ever, because it's not: 2007 boasted the smallest number of studio releases (179) of any year this decade. It all goes to show that power players in the business shouldn't be so quick to congratulate themselves — but since they're not likely to stop, moviegoers should expect to settle in for much, much more of the same. http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2008/...find.html#more
	__________________ The Key to the Kingdom of Heaven: John 3:3 *Money Doesn't Buy Happiness...But I'd Rather Cry in My Private Jet*

03-08-2008, 01:36 AM	#3
PlayOn ADHD: what I have not who I am Senior Member Join Date: Jun 17, 2006 Location: I'll never tell. :p Posts: 2,745	I seriously hope the taxpayers of America aren't paying for these studies.
	__________________ Have you heard the ? Jesus saves!!!

03-07-2008, 09:20 PM	#2
Ireneparalegal LEGAL SPICE ;) Forum Legend Join Date: Jul 25, 2005 Location: OXNARD, CA - WHERE THE DALLAS COWBOYS TRAIN & PRACTICE Posts: 38,691	It took a study to figure out ticket buyers pay more for movie tickets? And that studios spend more money to make movies? How insane. With the price of some celebs to appear in a movie it is a no-brainer that the consumer ends up paying in the end to watch an actor do his/her job for $15 million dollars.