Hollywood Braces For Threat Of Actors Strike

[Family Ties Forever!]

link

Hollywood braces for threat of actors strike
By Steve Gorman,Reuters
Posted: 2008-03-04 16:16:32
Los Angeles(Reuters) - The final epilogue to the tumultuous writers strike has been written, but Hollywood is bracing for a possible a sequel to the costly walkout -- this one starring film and television actors.

While the TV industry has rushed to bring derailed shows back on the air since screenwriters returned to work three weeks ago, the threat of renewed labor unrest by actors in the months ahead has put movie studios in a tenuous situation.

Filmmakers are reluctant to launch any production that cannot be completed before the expiration of the Screen Actors Guild's major film and TV contract on June 30 -- a date being treated as the union's de facto strike deadline.

Assuming a typical 60-day movie shoot, plus extra time for days off, possible overruns and re-shoots that might be necessary, that means few if any big-studio movies will start filming after the end of this month, industry experts say.

"The studios for the most part are not greenlighting any movies that would have to be in production after that (June 30) deadline," said an insider at one leading talent agency who was not authorized to speak publicly about client issues.

Labor jitters have even prompted Hollywood's leading insurance carrier, Fireman's Fund Insurance Co, to offer a first-of-its-kind "strike expense" policy for studios.

The policy covers the costs of a strike-related production shutdown in the event that an actor's illness, equipment damage or other unexpected loss pushes the shooting schedule of a movie past SAG's June 30 contract deadline.

STRIKE FATIGUE

Nerves are still raw from a 14-week strike by 10,500 writers that shut down much of the television industry and derailed numerous film projects, idling thousands of production workers and costing the local economy some $3 billion.

The walkout ended Feb. 12 after the two sides reached agreement on a deal giving writers more money for work distributed over the Internet. The contract was formally ratified by the Writers Guild of America membership last week.

The Screen Actors Guild shares many of the same contract demands. But SAG also faces issues unique to its 120,000 members, such as forced commercial endorsements through product placement in TV shows and movies.

Many in Hollywood believe strike fatigue is running too high for another work stoppage to materialize. But with tens of millions of dollars at stake when a film production is disrupted, movie studios are playing it safe.

Steven Spielberg has called off the April start to a DreamWorks film about the trial of the 1968 anti-war activists, the Chicago Seven, according to Daily Variety newspaper

Michael Bay, director of the 2007 summer action blockbuster "Transformers," is keeping his fingers crossed as he sticks to an early June start date for a sequel to the movie.

Given the wide concern, SAG leaders have been pressured to open contract talks with the major studios as soon as possible, leading to tensions between the guild and its sister union, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA).

SAG President Alan Rosenberg has insisted the guild will not be ready to begin official talks before early April.

Some leaders of AFTRA and SAG's New York wing have agitated for talks to begin sooner, as have several high-profile actors, including George Clooney and Tom Hanks who took out full-page ads in Hollywood trade papers urging immediate negotiations.

Rosenberg and SAG executive director Doug Allen recently suggested that informal talks like those that led to contracts with the WGA and the Directors Guild of America, were already under way. "We will certainly continue to meet with the CEOs of the major networks and studios as we prepare for formal negotiations," they wrote in a Feb. 28 memo to members.

Reuters/Nielsen

Copyright 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.

03/04/08 16:15 ET

[Mikado]

Heeeeeeeeeeere we go agaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnn!!!

[junecleaver]

Because people are so damn greedy. If anyone should be pissed about money, it should be firefighters and police and any other profession in which people put their lives/health in danger to save others. These people should be paid more than actors, writers, singers, etc.

[Mr. Television]

Originally Posted by junecleaver

Because people are so damn greedy. If anyone should be pissed about money, it should be firefighters and police and any other profession in which people put their lives/health in danger to save others. These people should be paid more than actors, writers, singers, etc.

Totally agree with you. Right now I'm mad at everybody in Hollywood. I'm dropping a bunch of shows I used to watch. I just can't get into them anymore and I found I managed alright without them.

[InspectorExstead]

Originally Posted by junecleaver

Because people are so damn greedy. If anyone should be pissed about money, it should be firefighters and police and any other profession in which people put their lives/health in danger to save others. These people should be paid more than actors, writers, singers, etc.

i totally agree with you!

[treky]

Originally Posted by junecleaver

Because people are so damn greedy. If anyone should be pissed about money, it should be firefighters and police and any other profession in which people put their lives/health in danger to save others. These people should be paid more than actors, writers, singers, etc.

I agree; totaly!

[treky]

Originally Posted by Family Ties Forever!

03/04/08 16:15 ET

oh god; here we go again!!!

[theshark8777]

I can't argue that, but why should the studios hog all the money that is made and not pay the actors enough? Its the same way in the music industry.

[Dean Winchester]

I agree to an extent, but let's face it, today's superstars make more with one role than the stars of yesteryear made in their entire careers. Are we supposed to feel sorry for people like Tom Hanks and Tom Cruise who earn $25 million per movie?

[theshark8777]

Well I'm not talking about the superstars, per se. The less paid ones.

[friendsfan77]

Like in the case of the WGA strike, I supported the reasoning behind it, but I hate how the fans get screwed and at times, they annoyed me.

[TJL]

The one thing the writers strike proved was that the TV industry didn't come to a screeching halt. The Networks simply amped up their production of reality shows to pick up the slack.

You don't think they'll do that if the actors go out on strike?

[theshark8777]

Did you see the ratings during the strike?

[Mr. Television]

Originally Posted by theshark8777

Did you see the ratings during the strike?

I'm waiting to see the ratings for the new shows now that the strike is over.

[Ireneparalegal]

Originally Posted by junecleaver

Because people are so damn greedy. If anyone should be pissed about money, it should be firefighters and police and any other profession in which people put their lives/health in danger to save others. These people should be paid more than actors, writers, singers, etc.

I've said that many a time when it came to discussing the outrageous $$$$ that celebs receive for film roles, on top of their diva-like demands, etc. Teachers, police departments, fire departments, nurses and schools deserve the kind of money that celebs get for merely entertaining us. What abt those who teach our children? What abt those who go into burning buildings? What abt those who go in the middle of gang-infested neighborhoods to protect the lives of those who want to live in peace? Such a shame.