Blades Of Glory On Top With $23 Million - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

comedyfreak · 04-08-2007, 03:21 PM

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Movie audiences were more interested in light comedy over Easter weekend than in Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez's "Grindhouse," a double-feature ode to bloody exploitation flicks.

Paramount and DreamWorks' figure-skating romp "Blades of Glory" remained the No. 1 movie with $23 million, followed for the second weekend by Disney's animated comedy "Meet the Robinsons" with $17 million, according to studio estimates Sunday.

"Grindhouse," a three-hour reinvention of the down-and-dirty B-movie double features Tarantino and Rodriguez grew up watching, debuted at No. 4 with $11.6 million.

It finished behind Sony's family comedy "Are We Done Yet?", starring Ice Cube in a sequel to "Are We There Yet?", which opened at No. 3 with $15 million.

Released by the Weinstein Co., "Grindhouse" fell well short of expectations. Box-office forecasters had figured the movie would premiere in the ballpark of Tarantino's two "Kill Bill" movies and Rodriguez's "Sin City," whose opening weekends ranged from $22 million to $29 million.

The weak debut for "Grindhouse" was a blow to the Weinstein Co., formed two years ago by brothers Harvey and Bob Weinstein after they departed their old outfit, Disney-owned Miramax. The "Grindhouse" directors were steady providers for the Weinsteins at Miramax, which released Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction" and "Kill Bill" films and Rodriguez's "Spy Kids" movies.

"Grindhouse" presents two full films. Rodriguez's "Planet Terror" features Rose McGowan as a go-go dancer who becomes a zombie fighter with a machine gun for a leg. Tarantino's "Death Proof" stars Kurt Russell as a serial killer who stalks women with his beefed-up car.

"With these two filmmakers' pedigree and the overall cool factor that this film had going for it, you would have figured it would have done a lot more business," said Paul Dergarabedian, president of box-office tracker Media By Numbers.

The movie's running time was an impediment, limiting the number of screenings theaters could fit in.

Harvey Weinstein said disappointing returns for "Grindhouse" resulted from the "novelty in America of releasing a double bill and asking an audience to make a three-hour commitment."

"Grindhouse" played to big crowds on the East and West coasts but failed to click with audiences in the Midwest and South, Weinstein said.

With theatrical receipts, overseas sales, television and home-video revenues, "Grindhouse" will turn a profit on its $53 million budget, Weinstein said. The company hoped that word of mouth from those who did see it would sustain it at theaters in coming weeks, he said.

"If you go see it with any audience, walk into any theater, you'll see people screaming and applauding like a rock concert," Weinstein said. "Maybe we didn't educate the audience that it's such an experience."

Movie-goers clearly were in the mood for something lighter. "Blades of Glory," starring Will Ferrell and Jon Heder as skating rivals who team up as the sport's first men's pair, raised its 10-day total to $68.4 million, its receipts dropping a slim 30 percent from opening weekend.

"There's a real hunger out there for something that you can go to and say, 'Hey, let me get away from the terrible things we have to watch and read every day,'" said Marvin Levy, spokesman for DreamWorks, one of the studios behind "Blades of Glory."

"Meet the Robinsons," the animated adventure of a time-traveling orphan boy, also held strongly in its second weekend, raising its 10-day total to $52.2 million.

Weekend Box Office Estimates (U.S.)
This Wk Last Wk Title Dist. Weekend Gross Cumulative
Gross Rlse
Wks # of
Theaters
1 1 Blades of Glory Paramount Pictures $23,000,000 $68,383,000 2 3410
2 2 Meet the Robinsons Buena Vista Pictures Distribution $17,004,000 $52,235,000 2 3435
3 - Are We Done Yet? Sony Pictures Releasing $15,000,000 $19,063,000 1 2877
4 - Grindhouse Dimension Films $11,591,000 $11,591,000 1 2624
5 - The Reaping Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution $10,080,000 $12,010,000 1 2603
6 3 300 Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution, Warner Bros. Pictures International $8,825,000 $193,880,000 5 2674
7 5 Wild Hogs Buena Vista Pictures Distribution $6,838,000 $145,453,000 6 2825
8 6 Shooter Paramount Pictures $5,800,000 $36,656,000 3 2353
9 4 TMNT Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution $4,935,000 $46,722,000 3 2811
10 - Firehouse Dog 20th Century Fox Distribution $4,000,000 $5,257,000 1 2860
11 7 Premonition Sony Pictures Releasing $3,200,000 $44,600,000 4 1752
12 9 Reign Over Me Sony Pictures Releasing $2,500,000 $17,406,000 3 1747

Brian Damage · 04-08-2007, 11:25 PM

I'm a little disappointed that Grindhouse didn't do better.

comedyfreak · 04-09-2007, 12:10 AM

Grind House has been out for awhile now hasn't it? I thought it made more than that. I want to see Blades of Glory and The Reaping.

Brian Damage · 04-09-2007, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comedyfreak

Grind House has been out for awhile now hasn't it? I thought it made more than that. I want to see Blades of Glory and The Reaping.

No, Grindhouse opened this weekend.

Superstar · 04-09-2007, 04:37 PM

That sucks about Grindhouse. I really thought it would do a lot better than that.

Brian · 04-09-2007, 04:43 PM

I think part of the reason that Grindhouse didn't do so well as expected was because of how long it is. When you have a movie (or in this case, two movies) that is almost three and a half hours long, the theaters won't have a lot of times to show it. Plus there won't be a a lot of people to buy popcorn and other concessions, which is how the theaters make the profits. This is why very few films are released to theaters that are overly long or have had to be cut down substantially. It is show business, after all.

Brian Damage · 04-09-2007, 07:00 PM

Two movies confuses the audience...

TOP REASONS "GRINDHOUSE" BOMBED

by Mark Bell
(2007-04-10)

Things aren't looking so hot for "Grindhouse" at the box office. After an opening weekend bringing in under $12 million dollars on 2,624 screens, the word circulated quickly that "Grindhouse" was dead-on-arrival. With the blood still fresh and the gun still smoking, Film Threat takes a look at the top reasons "Grindhouse" bombed.

It was named "Grindhouse"...
The film geeks got it, we understood. The average movie-going public however, the ones whose dollars actually make or break films, wasn't on board with the concept. How do we know this? Because the marketing campaign for "Grindhouse" included the definition of the title just to be safe. If you've got a film with a title so obscure you feel the need to define it in advertising, it doesn't bode well.

It opened on Easter Weekend...
Um, yeah, WHAT THE HELL!?! A grindhouse film or films should not open on a family holiday weekend. The normal movie-goers were out in force, sure, but as it's a holiday, they were there with grandma, grandpa and the kids. When you're looking over the marquee trying to figure out what film to watch so as to make everyone in the family happy, chances are you don't pick "Grindhouse" (unless you have the coolest family ever... most people don't). The only R-rated zombie film that can get away with an Easter opening and do well is "The Passion of the Christ."

It was a double-feature...
Many will point to the running time and say that, with a 3 hour+ movie, you're already eliminating a couple screenings per day therefore lessening the amount of money you bring in daily. While this is true, this hasn't stopped other 3 hour+ epics from doing extremely well (remember that limp-dick adventure known as "Titanic"). The fact that this was two films, however, just confused people. Already stricken with short attention spans, the average movie-goer was no doubt stuck at the thought of seeing two films when there's so much more they have to do during the weekend (like Easter egg hunts, changing grandpa's diaper, etc). Forget all arguments about more bang for your buck, most folks wanted to see their normal length, Will Ferrell-in-homosexually-charged-ice-skating-sequences comedy.

The films were grindhouse films...
The main joy of "Grindhouse," I feel, is the re-creation of an experience in our pasts: the ****ty movie-theater showing ****ty films for cheap. For those of us who actually enjoyed the grindhouse theater or its more rural cousin, the drive-in, this film is 3 hours of fond memories and inside-joke-winkery, coupled with two very solid films directed by two of the most amazing directors alive today. But, unless you're in your late 20's or older, chances are you didn't have that experience. As that younger set is the box office demographic, they're missing the point. And in a society where anything that occurs in "Planet Terror" has probably been done in a videogame anyway, the selling point of the movies themselves comes up short. Finally, for those that do remember those old grindhouse films, they probably remember that the majority of those films were awful. Save a scene here or there, most grindhouse films never delivered on their advertised promise. So, if you think you're in for two crappy movies, made to look crappier via digital effects or film print aging, AND the overall experience isn't anything you care about, well, you're going to wind up skipping this film.

The geeks have not inherited the Earth yet...
I know it feels like we're close, but the geeks have not conquered the world yet. Despite the fact that computers are cool now, nerds are billionaires and many geeks have a hand in the day-to-day entertainment media, we still don't make up the majority of movie-goers; that box office cash isn't coming out of our pockets. If you're a film geek it's worse, as you get to regularly see truly amazing films bite the box office bullet and fall through the cracks while something like "Norbit" makes millions upon millions. If we had our way, "Grindhouse" would be #1, "The Reaping" and "Firehouse Dog" wouldn't crack the top ten and Eddie Murphy would get an electric shock any time he THINKS of getting in a fat suit. But we don't have our way, and "Grindhouse" is just the latest lamb led to the pop culture slaughter.

Critics liked the movie...
It's a known fact that anything the critics are fans of will naturally be ignored by the general public in favor of something less worthy, so it's almost a kiss of death for anyone besides Ebert to like anything nowadays. With a 83% Fresh rating at Rotten Tomatoes and a favorable score of 78 at MetaCritic (and a 4 1/2 star review from yours truly), "Grindhouse" was doomed. Quentin, Robert... I'm sorry we liked your movie...

There you have it, the top reasons "Grindhouse" bombed its opening weekend. The aftermath? What will this mean for Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino? Will the maverick directors be put on tighter studio leashes for all future films after this debacle? Nahhhhhhh. For one, Robert Rodriguez IS the studio that churned these films out, and as such, if he feels like filming a Muppet masturbating a turtle while Antonio Banderas does a handstand on a land-mine, well, he can do whatever the Hell he wants. You try stopping him. And Tarantino? Like he gives a flying **** what the box office return was. He's going to keep writing and making his films exactly the way he wants precisely as he always has. And I'll be in line waiting.

04-08-2007, 03:21 PM	#1
comedyfreak Cheers! Forum Fanatic Join Date: Dec 14, 2005 Location: Sunny California Posts: 11,060	Blades Of Glory On Top With $23 Million LOS ANGELES (AP) - Movie audiences were more interested in light comedy over Easter weekend than in Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez's "Grindhouse," a double-feature ode to bloody exploitation flicks. Paramount and DreamWorks' figure-skating romp "Blades of Glory" remained the No. 1 movie with $23 million, followed for the second weekend by Disney's animated comedy "Meet the Robinsons" with $17 million, according to studio estimates Sunday. "Grindhouse," a three-hour reinvention of the down-and-dirty B-movie double features Tarantino and Rodriguez grew up watching, debuted at No. 4 with $11.6 million. It finished behind Sony's family comedy "Are We Done Yet?", starring Ice Cube in a sequel to "Are We There Yet?", which opened at No. 3 with $15 million. Released by the Weinstein Co., "Grindhouse" fell well short of expectations. Box-office forecasters had figured the movie would premiere in the ballpark of Tarantino's two "Kill Bill" movies and Rodriguez's "Sin City," whose opening weekends ranged from $22 million to $29 million. The weak debut for "Grindhouse" was a blow to the Weinstein Co., formed two years ago by brothers Harvey and Bob Weinstein after they departed their old outfit, Disney-owned Miramax. The "Grindhouse" directors were steady providers for the Weinsteins at Miramax, which released Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction" and "Kill Bill" films and Rodriguez's "Spy Kids" movies. "Grindhouse" presents two full films. Rodriguez's "Planet Terror" features Rose McGowan as a go-go dancer who becomes a zombie fighter with a machine gun for a leg. Tarantino's "Death Proof" stars Kurt Russell as a serial killer who stalks women with his beefed-up car. "With these two filmmakers' pedigree and the overall cool factor that this film had going for it, you would have figured it would have done a lot more business," said Paul Dergarabedian, president of box-office tracker Media By Numbers. The movie's running time was an impediment, limiting the number of screenings theaters could fit in. Harvey Weinstein said disappointing returns for "Grindhouse" resulted from the "novelty in America of releasing a double bill and asking an audience to make a three-hour commitment." "Grindhouse" played to big crowds on the East and West coasts but failed to click with audiences in the Midwest and South, Weinstein said. With theatrical receipts, overseas sales, television and home-video revenues, "Grindhouse" will turn a profit on its $53 million budget, Weinstein said. The company hoped that word of mouth from those who did see it would sustain it at theaters in coming weeks, he said. "If you go see it with any audience, walk into any theater, you'll see people screaming and applauding like a rock concert," Weinstein said. "Maybe we didn't educate the audience that it's such an experience." Movie-goers clearly were in the mood for something lighter. "Blades of Glory," starring Will Ferrell and Jon Heder as skating rivals who team up as the sport's first men's pair, raised its 10-day total to $68.4 million, its receipts dropping a slim 30 percent from opening weekend. "There's a real hunger out there for something that you can go to and say, 'Hey, let me get away from the terrible things we have to watch and read every day,'" said Marvin Levy, spokesman for DreamWorks, one of the studios behind "Blades of Glory." "Meet the Robinsons," the animated adventure of a time-traveling orphan boy, also held strongly in its second weekend, raising its 10-day total to $52.2 million. Weekend Box Office Estimates (U.S.) This Wk Last Wk Title Dist. Weekend Gross Cumulative Gross Rlse Wks # of Theaters 1 1 Blades of Glory Paramount Pictures $23,000,000 $68,383,000 2 3410 2 2 Meet the Robinsons Buena Vista Pictures Distribution $17,004,000 $52,235,000 2 3435 3 - Are We Done Yet? Sony Pictures Releasing $15,000,000 $19,063,000 1 2877 4 - Grindhouse Dimension Films $11,591,000 $11,591,000 1 2624 5 - The Reaping Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution $10,080,000 $12,010,000 1 2603 6 3 300 Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution, Warner Bros. Pictures International $8,825,000 $193,880,000 5 2674 7 5 Wild Hogs Buena Vista Pictures Distribution $6,838,000 $145,453,000 6 2825 8 6 Shooter Paramount Pictures $5,800,000 $36,656,000 3 2353 9 4 TMNT Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution $4,935,000 $46,722,000 3 2811 10 - Firehouse Dog 20th Century Fox Distribution $4,000,000 $5,257,000 1 2860 11 7 Premonition Sony Pictures Releasing $3,200,000 $44,600,000 4 1752 12 9 Reign Over Me Sony Pictures Releasing $2,500,000 $17,406,000 3 1747
	__________________ www.facebook.com/comedyfreak

04-08-2007, 11:25 PM	#2
Brian Damage I'm Rich Bitch Forum Icon Join Date: Feb 03, 2002 Location: What Ain't No Country I Ever Heard Of...They Speak English in What? Posts: 63,107	I'm a little disappointed that Grindhouse didn't do better.
	__________________ The Key to the Kingdom of Heaven: John 3:3 *Money Doesn't Buy Happiness...But I'd Rather Cry in My Private Jet*

04-09-2007, 12:10 AM	#3
comedyfreak Cheers! Forum Fanatic Join Date: Dec 14, 2005 Location: Sunny California Posts: 11,060	Grind House has been out for awhile now hasn't it? I thought it made more than that. I want to see Blades of Glory and The Reaping.

04-09-2007, 04:37 PM	#5
Superstar Member Forum Icon Join Date: Dec 08, 2003 Posts: 63,316	That sucks about Grindhouse. I really thought it would do a lot better than that.

04-09-2007, 04:43 PM	#6
Brian Member Forum Celebrity Join Date: Jun 23, 2001 Posts: 20,451	I think part of the reason that Grindhouse didn't do so well as expected was because of how long it is. When you have a movie (or in this case, two movies) that is almost three and a half hours long, the theaters won't have a lot of times to show it. Plus there won't be a a lot of people to buy popcorn and other concessions, which is how the theaters make the profits. This is why very few films are released to theaters that are overly long or have had to be cut down substantially. It is show business, after all.

04-09-2007, 07:00 PM	#7
Brian Damage I'm Rich Bitch Forum Icon Join Date: Feb 03, 2002 Location: What Ain't No Country I Ever Heard Of...They Speak English in What? Posts: 63,107	Two movies confuses the audience... TOP REASONS "GRINDHOUSE" BOMBED by Mark Bell (2007-04-10) Things aren't looking so hot for "Grindhouse" at the box office. After an opening weekend bringing in under $12 million dollars on 2,624 screens, the word circulated quickly that "Grindhouse" was dead-on-arrival. With the blood still fresh and the gun still smoking, Film Threat takes a look at the top reasons "Grindhouse" bombed. It was named "Grindhouse"... The film geeks got it, we understood. The average movie-going public however, the ones whose dollars actually make or break films, wasn't on board with the concept. How do we know this? Because the marketing campaign for "Grindhouse" included the definition of the title just to be safe. If you've got a film with a title so obscure you feel the need to define it in advertising, it doesn't bode well. It opened on Easter Weekend... Um, yeah, WHAT THE HELL!?! A grindhouse film or films should not open on a family holiday weekend. The normal movie-goers were out in force, sure, but as it's a holiday, they were there with grandma, grandpa and the kids. When you're looking over the marquee trying to figure out what film to watch so as to make everyone in the family happy, chances are you don't pick "Grindhouse" (unless you have the coolest family ever... most people don't). The only R-rated zombie film that can get away with an Easter opening and do well is "The Passion of the Christ." It was a double-feature... Many will point to the running time and say that, with a 3 hour+ movie, you're already eliminating a couple screenings per day therefore lessening the amount of money you bring in daily. While this is true, this hasn't stopped other 3 hour+ epics from doing extremely well (remember that limp-dick adventure known as "Titanic"). The fact that this was two films, however, just confused people. Already stricken with short attention spans, the average movie-goer was no doubt stuck at the thought of seeing two films when there's so much more they have to do during the weekend (like Easter egg hunts, changing grandpa's diaper, etc). Forget all arguments about more bang for your buck, most folks wanted to see their normal length, Will Ferrell-in-homosexually-charged-ice-skating-sequences comedy. The films were grindhouse films... The main joy of "Grindhouse," I feel, is the re-creation of an experience in our pasts: the **ty movie-theater showing ty films for cheap. For those of us who actually enjoyed the grindhouse theater or its more rural cousin, the drive-in, this film is 3 hours of fond memories and inside-joke-winkery, coupled with two very solid films directed by two of the most amazing directors alive today. But, unless you're in your late 20's or older, chances are you didn't have that experience. As that younger set is the box office demographic, they're missing the point. And in a society where anything that occurs in "Planet Terror" has probably been done in a videogame anyway, the selling point of the movies themselves comes up short. Finally, for those that do remember those old grindhouse films, they probably remember that the majority of those films were awful. Save a scene here or there, most grindhouse films never delivered on their advertised promise. So, if you think you're in for two crappy movies, made to look crappier via digital effects or film print aging, AND the overall experience isn't anything you care about, well, you're going to wind up skipping this film. The geeks have not inherited the Earth yet... I know it feels like we're close, but the geeks have not conquered the world yet. Despite the fact that computers are cool now, nerds are billionaires and many geeks have a hand in the day-to-day entertainment media, we still don't make up the majority of movie-goers; that box office cash isn't coming out of our pockets. If you're a film geek it's worse, as you get to regularly see truly amazing films bite the box office bullet and fall through the cracks while something like "Norbit" makes millions upon millions. If we had our way, "Grindhouse" would be #1, "The Reaping" and "Firehouse Dog" wouldn't crack the top ten and Eddie Murphy would get an electric shock any time he THINKS of getting in a fat suit. But we don't have our way, and "Grindhouse" is just the latest lamb led to the pop culture slaughter. Critics liked the movie... It's a known fact that anything the critics are fans of will naturally be ignored by the general public in favor of something less worthy, so it's almost a kiss of death for anyone besides Ebert to like anything nowadays. With a 83% Fresh rating at Rotten Tomatoes and a favorable score of 78 at MetaCritic (and a 4 1/2 star review from yours truly), "Grindhouse" was doomed. Quentin, Robert... I'm sorry we liked your movie... There you have it, the top reasons "Grindhouse" bombed its opening weekend. The aftermath? What will this mean for Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino? Will the maverick directors be put on tighter studio leashes for all future films after this debacle? Nahhhhhhh. For one, Robert Rodriguez IS the studio that churned these films out, and as such, if he feels like filming a Muppet masturbating a turtle while Antonio Banderas does a handstand on a land-mine, well, he can do whatever the Hell he wants. You try stopping him. And Tarantino? Like he gives a flying ** what the box office return was. He's going to keep writing and making his films exactly the way he wants precisely as he always has. And I'll be in line waiting.