AMW Fans....... - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Beavervalleygirl · 05-13-2006, 09:16 AM

has there ever been an update on baby Sabrina from Florida ? She was kidnapped when she was 5 months old. (Thank You in advance.)

Kane · 05-13-2006, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beavervalleygirl

has there ever been an update on baby Sabrina from Florida ? She was kidnapped when she was 5 months old. (Thank You in advance.)

Sadly, we still don't know what became of her. 48 Hours Mystery did an episode about Sabrina in 2005. Here's the transcript. It has an image of how Sabrina might have aged.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/...in666740.shtml

Big3sCompanyFan · 05-14-2006, 03:10 AM

I remember that case from even before 2005. That happened in 2003 or 2004 or even earlier, right?

I think the parents are involved somehow. They said they left their garage door open and the house door unlocked and some stranger just HAPPENED to know that and just HAPPENED to be there that day and just HAPPENED to know they had a baby and just HAPPENED to know exactly where it was and took the baby without ever waking the parents up?????

Yeah, RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.

The police or FBI caught some incriminating statements on tape from the parents but it seems it was too inaudible to be admitted in court although the FBI did decipher it and they showed the subtitles as they spoke but for some stupid reason the court did not believe it.

The parents really seemed to be involved. I think there was a theory they had an accident with the baby or one of them accidentally rolled over it or something and they panicked and just made up a story.

What do you all think???

Beavervalleygirl · 05-14-2006, 10:33 AM

I think they were involved also. How come their dog never barked at the intruder ?

Kane · 05-14-2006, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big3sCompanyFan

I remember that case from even before 2005. That happened in 2003 or 2004 or even earlier, right?

Sabrina disappeared in 1997. UM did a segment about her in 1999.

Big3sCompanyFan · 05-15-2006, 03:53 PM

I'm suprised the parents have not been arrested by now.

Obi Wan · 02-28-2009, 12:16 AM

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/...n4298623.shtml

I know this is a really old thread hope it is ok to revive it.

Big3sCompanyFan · 02-28-2009, 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Obi Wan

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/...n4298623.shtml

I know this is a really old thread hope it is ok to revive it.

It's great to revive an old thead. THE PASSAGE OF TIME CAN TEACH US ALL A LESSON.

It's amazing that supposedly some guy in jail confessed to this but as they said in the article they'll need more than that.

TracyLynnS · 02-28-2009, 09:21 PM

I listened to the recordings that were taken from the "bugs" from the Aisenburg's home.

Those recordings are so full of excessive and loud static that sometimes you cannot even hear that a person is even speaking. During the times that you can tell a person is speaking, the only thing you tell is that it is probably a human voice. No words are discernable.

There were times when the parents were supposed to be saying things like "I shouldn't have done the coke." "I killed the baby when I was on coke." Similar things to that.

I never heard anything other than muffled mumbling covered by static. All they did was reveal how completely incompetent the police were in the arts of simple audio surveillance.

Whether the parents killed the baby or not, there was never any incriminating evidence caught on the tapes. Absolutely nothing. The only "deciphering" the authorities did was make ridiculous guesses as to what they thought the Aisenburgs were saying. I am not exaggerating about this. They just guessed. No professional "deciphering" was involved.

It was apparent to the judge that what was being said on the tapes was not understandable. That's why he would not allow it to be presented as evidence against the parents.

Big3sCompanyFan · 03-01-2009, 03:35 PM

Shouldn't the police have known better that you couldn't understand what was being said on the tape? Why would they bring forth evidence that no one can ever hear?? Didn't they know it was just a waste of time since it would just be thrown out anyway?

TracyLynnS · 03-04-2009, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big3sCompanyFan

Shouldn't the police have known better that you couldn't understand what was being said on the tape? Why would they bring forth evidence that no one can ever hear?? Didn't they know it was just a waste of time since it would just be thrown out anyway?

You would think they would have known better, but look at all of the ridiculous things officials have done before that we've discussed here.

Heck, I'm surprised that the cops didn't tell the Aisenbergs that they couldn't file a missing persons report on the infant until she had been gone for at least 72 hours. You know, she could just have been misplaced, or something, and might turn up soon.

That's what they told a Texas mom when her 7 year old daughter (Katherine Korzulius) went missing in the mid 1990s. Thirty minutes later, the mom found the kid dead in the street.

05-13-2006, 09:16 AM	#1
Beavervalleygirl Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Sep 10, 2005 Posts: 30	AMW Fans....... has there ever been an update on baby Sabrina from Florida ? She was kidnapped when she was 5 months old. (Thank You in advance.)

02-28-2009, 12:16 AM	#7
Obi Wan Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jan 30, 2009 Location: New Mexico Posts: 65	Shocking if true http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/...n4298623.shtml I know this is a really old thread hope it is ok to revive it.
	__________________ UM Fan Forever

05-14-2006, 03:10 AM	#3
Big3sCompanyFan Member Senior Member Join Date: Sep 16, 2003 Posts: 2,493	I remember that case from even before 2005. That happened in 2003 or 2004 or even earlier, right? I think the parents are involved somehow. They said they left their garage door open and the house door unlocked and some stranger just HAPPENED to know that and just HAPPENED to be there that day and just HAPPENED to know they had a baby and just HAPPENED to know exactly where it was and took the baby without ever waking the parents up????? Yeah, RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT. The police or FBI caught some incriminating statements on tape from the parents but it seems it was too inaudible to be admitted in court although the FBI did decipher it and they showed the subtitles as they spoke but for some stupid reason the court did not believe it. The parents really seemed to be involved. I think there was a theory they had an accident with the baby or one of them accidentally rolled over it or something and they panicked and just made up a story. What do you all think???

05-14-2006, 10:33 AM	#4
Beavervalleygirl Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Sep 10, 2005 Posts: 30	I think they were involved also. How come their dog never barked at the intruder ?

05-15-2006, 03:53 PM	#6
Big3sCompanyFan Member Senior Member Join Date: Sep 16, 2003 Posts: 2,493	I'm suprised the parents have not been arrested by now.

02-28-2009, 09:21 PM	#9
TracyLynnS Don't Look Up Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 07, 2009 Posts: 3,107	I listened to the recordings that were taken from the "bugs" from the Aisenburg's home. Those recordings are so full of excessive and loud static that sometimes you cannot even hear that a person is even speaking. During the times that you can tell a person is speaking, the only thing you tell is that it is probably a human voice. No words are discernable. There were times when the parents were supposed to be saying things like "I shouldn't have done the coke." "I killed the baby when I was on coke." Similar things to that. I never heard anything other than muffled mumbling covered by static. All they did was reveal how completely incompetent the police were in the arts of simple audio surveillance. Whether the parents killed the baby or not, there was never any incriminating evidence caught on the tapes. Absolutely nothing. The only "deciphering" the authorities did was make ridiculous guesses as to what they thought the Aisenburgs were saying. I am not exaggerating about this. They just guessed. No professional "deciphering" was involved. It was apparent to the judge that what was being said on the tapes was not understandable. That's why he would not allow it to be presented as evidence against the parents.

03-01-2009, 03:35 PM	#10
Big3sCompanyFan Member Senior Member Join Date: Sep 16, 2003 Posts: 2,493	Shouldn't the police have known better that you couldn't understand what was being said on the tape? Why would they bring forth evidence that no one can ever hear?? Didn't they know it was just a waste of time since it would just be thrown out anyway?