Why was it necessary for JJ to take a pic of the bride & groom when... - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Ireneparalegal · 12-09-2005, 01:30 PM

they were obviously going to have a photographer for the wedding? He could have used one of those photos to paint a pic of the couple

Brieannas21 · 12-09-2005, 04:48 PM

They had to make up some reason why Kieth would break his leg, end up losing his contract and living with the Evans.

sdb7373 · 12-09-2005, 04:58 PM

Ya know that fall that Keith had was so exaggerated. I mean all he did was trip over JJ's foot or leg/whatever. I dont think you can break your leg just by tripping over someone. It wasnt like he was running or something. It was a minor fall. They took it to the extreme.

Ireneparalegal · 12-09-2005, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdb7373

Ya know that fall that Keith had was so exaggerated. I mean all he did was trip over JJ's foot or leg/whatever. I dont think you can break your leg just by tripping over someone. It wasnt like he was running or something. It was a minor fall. They took it to the extreme.

Yep, they sure did. They should have had it happen another way. Instead of using those damn filler moments, they could have shown the wedding sooner and then as the family is waiting for the bride and groom to show up to the reception, they could've gotten word that there had been a car accident (AGAIN???? lol)

nerrad · 12-12-2005, 08:54 AM

I like how one of the groomsmen said "It looks pretty bad".

TVFactFan · 12-12-2005, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdb7373

Ya know that fall that Keith had was so exaggerated. I mean all he did was trip over JJ's foot or leg/whatever. I dont think you can break your leg just by tripping over someone. It wasnt like he was running or something. It was a minor fall. They took it to the extreme.

It's actually different versions of Keith falling over J.J. The one in the episode and the other version in the Teaser before the next episode. In the teaser, which is on the UNCUT version, Keith's fall was more comical than it was in the actual episode. That may only be seen on Columbia House or the DVD

12-09-2005, 01:30 PM	#1
Ireneparalegal LEGAL SPICE ;) Forum Legend Join Date: Jul 25, 2005 Location: OXNARD, CA - WHERE THE DALLAS COWBOYS TRAIN & PRACTICE Posts: 38,691	Why was it necessary for JJ to take a pic of the bride & groom when... they were obviously going to have a photographer for the wedding? He could have used one of those photos to paint a pic of the couple
	__________________ DALLAS COWBOYS ARE HERE AT TRAINING CAMP!!!

12-09-2005, 04:48 PM	#2
Brieannas21 Member Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 05, 2004 Location: Texas Posts: 9,792	They had to make up some reason why Kieth would break his leg, end up losing his contract and living with the Evans.

12-09-2005, 04:58 PM	#3
sdb7373 Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Sep 21, 2005 Posts: 67	Ya know that fall that Keith had was so exaggerated. I mean all he did was trip over JJ's foot or leg/whatever. I dont think you can break your leg just by tripping over someone. It wasnt like he was running or something. It was a minor fall. They took it to the extreme.

12-12-2005, 08:54 AM	#5
nerrad Member Senior Member Join Date: Oct 06, 2003 Location: pfunkytown Posts: 1,253	I like how one of the groomsmen said "It looks pretty bad".