View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Chit Chat - Main Board / Games / Movies / Music / Sports / Video Games / Chit Chat - Classic / View Latest Threads in All Chit Chat Boards
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,129
|
A$$!!!!!!!!!!-LOL Damm, what a way to lose a football game. On a 2 point conversion. But you have to blame the Skins defenders for jumping off sides so they could block the extra point-lol Now the Skins are 5-4 with the raiders coming to town next week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 20, 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 10,704
|
The Redskins really didn't lose the game because Mike Alstott didn't get in the end zone at the end of the game. I don't know how the referees say he did get in but he didn't. They showed the replay 3 times and from what i saw, the ball didn't cross the goal line. The referees are so f*ckin blind. They make so many terrible calls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,129
|
Quote:
Well he looked like he crossed the goal line to me. With that second effort he landed right at the goal line and the ball crossed the line. But still the skins are the blame for jumping off sides. If they never jumped off sides they would have gotten the ball back with 58 seconds and the game would have been tied at 35 instead of them being down 36-35. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 20, 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 10,704
|
The game wouldn't have been tied if the Redskins didn't jump off sides because the Redskins had the lead 35-34. The ball didn't cross the goal line when Mark Alstott had it. Trust me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,129
|
Quote:
This is what I'm saying, Since the skins were so aggressive in trying to block the extra point they jumped off sides which cause the refs to throw a flag and move the bucs closer to the goal line. So since they were now on the 1 yd line, gruden decided to go ahead for the 2 pointer to win the game instead of playing for OT. Now if the skins never jumped off sides, there wouldn;t have been a flag and the ball would have been on the 5 yd line which was too far to go for a 2 point conversion so they would have just kicked the extra point and the game would have been tied at 35. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 20, 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 10,704
|
How would the score have been tied at 35 if Tampa Bay had 34 before they scored the 2 points to get 36?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Football Chick
Forum Fanatic
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
8/26/05 Jessica & Anthony |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,129
|
Quote:
Ok listen, the Bucs was down 35-28 right? So then they threw a TD and scored and then the score was 34-35 and the Bucs were getting ready to kick the extra point to tie the game at 35. But when they went to kick the extra point, the skins jumped off sides and was hit with a 5 yd penalty and that moved the bucs to the 1yd line. So since they were only a yd away from the endzone, gruden said f*uck it let;s go for the 2 and win this sh*T. So that's when Alstott scored to make it 36-35. So I was just saying the penalty is why the bucs went for 2 instead of 1. Hope I was clear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 20, 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 10,704
|
The score was 36-35. Tampa Bay would've still won the game if they would've been trailing 35-34 if they would've kicked a field goal so either way the Redskins would've lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 20, 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 10,704
|
Oh ok. I see what your saying now. The Redskins shouldn't have jumped off sides. When that receiver for Tampa Bay scored to make the score 35-34, the guy who was defending him for the Redskins did a terrible job covering him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,129
|
Quote:
Exactly so they shouldn;t be mad at the refs, they should be mad at the three players for jumping off sides so they can block an extra point which only would have tied the game at 35 not won the game-lol That's why I didn;t understand the agressiveness when they were going to get the ball back with 58 seconds with a tied game. The skins was acting like they were up 34-28 instead of 35-28. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I'm Rich Bitch
Forum Icon
|
I am convinced, the Redskins are a very overrated team.
|
|
__________________
The Key to the Kingdom of Heaven: John 3:3 Money Doesn't Buy Happiness...But I'd Rather Cry in My Private Jet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,129
|
Quote:
LadyJess you know nothing about football. The bucs was down 35-28 and scored a TD and that gave them 34. Since when is scoring a TD 5 points? so if that was true that means the buce would have lost. What the hell are you talkin about? They had 34 with the TD and the 2 made it 36. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
23 Years at Sitcoms Online
Forum Icon
Join Date: Jun 06, 2003
Location: Somewhere you're Not
Posts: 62,132
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
Sonny |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,129
|
Quote:
Since they beat the Eagles I wouldn't say they were overrated. They lost that game yesterday because of a bonehead play of trying to block a extra point-lol |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|