Movie theater owners fire back at studios - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Courtnee · 08-20-2005, 12:34 AM

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Tired of being blamed for the box office slump, the nation's movie theater owners returned fire Thursday, accusing the studios of delivering sub-standard product. "Here's what we know about 2005: The movies are not as good," said John Fithian, president of the National Association of Theater Owners.

"They're not terrible; they're just not as good. And so the industry has experienced a temporary drop-off compared to 2004, the biggest box office year in movie history."

His remarks were part of a direct rebuke to Robert Iger, who is about to take over as CEO of the Walt Disney Co. Iger said last week during the firm's third-quarter conference call that the industry should move toward the simultaneous release of theatrical films and videos. In 2004, the average gap between a film's release in theaters and on video was four months, 16 days.

Fithian said that compressing windows "to placate this instant-everywhere appetite" would result in a world with "no viable movie theater industry ... at least not a theater industry devoted to the entertainment products of Hollywood.

"(Iger) should know that Hollywood studios would be merely one shriveled vendor among many in that new world of movies-as-commodities-only," he added.

Neither Iger nor Disney chose to respond to Fithian's comments.

Year-to-date box office sales stand at $5.57 billion compared with $6.05 billion at the same time in 2004. Pundits have cited exhibitors' pumped-up onscreen advertising, rising ticket prices and rude patrons as primary reasons moviegoers are staying home.

During the earnings call, Iger said, "I don't think it's out of the question that a DVD can be released in effect in the same window as a theatrical release. Although I'm sure we will get a fair amount of push-back on this from the industry, it's not out of the question. I think that all the old rules should be called into question because the rules in terms of consumption have changed so dramatically."

While no major exhibitor has suggested taking aggressive action against Disney based on Iger's comments, theater owners in the past have shown tremendous resistance to anyone who advocates a compressed windows strategy. Many in the industry believe it's just a matter of time until a major studio attempts such an experiment in the hope of reducing marketing costs and maximizing profits across the various platforms.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050819/en_nm/theaters_dc

Mikado · 08-20-2005, 01:59 AM

Sounds cool to me, why DO only Hollywood films get wide distribution ( with a few excptions ) ? The best films from anywhere should be shown! Here in Canada, for instance, our OWN movie industry is labelled "Foreign film" and rarely shown in theaters, because all the distributors here are based in the USA; and consider only American films for wide release!!!

theshark8777 · 08-20-2005, 10:20 AM

I think the box office this year was filled with sequels and remakes. None of the movies really seemed to be that interesting. Plus there was no Pixar movies this year. Also, why would people pay $8-10 to go see a movie when you can wait and get it on DVD for $15-20, or rent it for far less? There are a lot of movies (in fact almost every movie) I don't think is worth seeing in a theatre, so I'll wait for the DVD.

08-20-2005, 12:34 AM	#1
Courtnee MAN VS SAMMICH. Forum Star Join Date: Mar 23, 2005 Location: Louisiana Posts: 16,413	Movie theater owners fire back at studios LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Tired of being blamed for the box office slump, the nation's movie theater owners returned fire Thursday, accusing the studios of delivering sub-standard product. "Here's what we know about 2005: The movies are not as good," said John Fithian, president of the National Association of Theater Owners. "They're not terrible; they're just not as good. And so the industry has experienced a temporary drop-off compared to 2004, the biggest box office year in movie history." His remarks were part of a direct rebuke to Robert Iger, who is about to take over as CEO of the Walt Disney Co. Iger said last week during the firm's third-quarter conference call that the industry should move toward the simultaneous release of theatrical films and videos. In 2004, the average gap between a film's release in theaters and on video was four months, 16 days. Fithian said that compressing windows "to placate this instant-everywhere appetite" would result in a world with "no viable movie theater industry ... at least not a theater industry devoted to the entertainment products of Hollywood. "(Iger) should know that Hollywood studios would be merely one shriveled vendor among many in that new world of movies-as-commodities-only," he added. Neither Iger nor Disney chose to respond to Fithian's comments. Year-to-date box office sales stand at $5.57 billion compared with $6.05 billion at the same time in 2004. Pundits have cited exhibitors' pumped-up onscreen advertising, rising ticket prices and rude patrons as primary reasons moviegoers are staying home. During the earnings call, Iger said, "I don't think it's out of the question that a DVD can be released in effect in the same window as a theatrical release. Although I'm sure we will get a fair amount of push-back on this from the industry, it's not out of the question. I think that all the old rules should be called into question because the rules in terms of consumption have changed so dramatically." While no major exhibitor has suggested taking aggressive action against Disney based on Iger's comments, theater owners in the past have shown tremendous resistance to anyone who advocates a compressed windows strategy. Many in the industry believe it's just a matter of time until a major studio attempts such an experiment in the hope of reducing marketing costs and maximizing profits across the various platforms. Reuters/Hollywood Reporter http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050819/en_nm/theaters_dc
	__________________ Whether I'm the rose of sheer perfection A freckle on the nose of life's complexion The Cinderella or the shine apple of its eye I gotta fly once, I gotta try once, Only can die once, right, sir? Ooh, life is juicy, juicy and you see, I gotta have my bite, sir. Get ready for me love, 'cause I'm a "comer" I simply gotta march, my heart's a drummer Don't bring around the cloud to rain on my parade

08-20-2005, 10:20 AM	#3
theshark8777 Hats for Bats Forum Veteran Join Date: Jan 23, 2001 Location: northeast Ohio. Posts: 5,315	I think the box office this year was filled with sequels and remakes. None of the movies really seemed to be that interesting. Plus there was no Pixar movies this year. Also, why would people pay $8-10 to go see a movie when you can wait and get it on DVD for $15-20, or rent it for far less? There are a lot of movies (in fact almost every movie) I don't think is worth seeing in a theatre, so I'll wait for the DVD.
	__________________ Who ate all the pecan Sandies??

08-20-2005, 01:59 AM	#2
Mikado Main st bridge Forum Superstar Join Date: Jul 06, 2005 Posts: 25,886	Sounds cool to me, why DO only Hollywood films get wide distribution ( with a few excptions ) ? The best films from anywhere should be shown! Here in Canada, for instance, our OWN movie industry is labelled "Foreign film" and rarely shown in theaters, because all the distributors here are based in the USA; and consider only American films for wide release!!!