Dancing With the Stars Scores in the Ratings - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Pavan · 06-02-2005, 10:56 AM

10.6/16 in the overnights, 13.23 million viewers and a 4.2/12 among adults 18-49. #1 for the night.

Brent88 · 06-02-2005, 12:46 PM

I found it boring. I'm suspecting there will be a big dropoff next week. Still... that's a lot better than I was expecting.

TripperFan · 06-02-2005, 01:15 PM

Its the one I chose (over that stupid Ashton thing about Geeks). Probably a big reason for the good ratings - there was just nothing else on at 9 last night!

It wasn't bad - yea, maybe a little boring but it was kinda fun seeing Holyfield out there - and he wasn't too bad considering he's a heavyweight boxer!!! It could certainly hold his own on a regular dancefloor!

I'd like to take a bazooka to the judges tho! Especially that snobby British guy <bitch slaps the old geezer >

*MIBabe03* · 06-02-2005, 01:59 PM

That show I'm not interested in at all.

Brent88 · 06-02-2005, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripperFan

Its the one I chose (over that stupid Ashton thing about Geeks). Probably a big reason for the good ratings - there was just nothing else on at 9 last night!

I agree there... 9pm last night SUCKED.

Pavan · 06-02-2005, 05:34 PM

A good sign is that the show built in its second half hour -- meaning viewers liked what they saw. The first episode reairs again Sunday at 7pm.

JT · 06-02-2005, 05:45 PM

I'm sorry but watching Kelly Monaco dancing like that...was just effing hilarious...

TripperFan · 06-02-2005, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JT

I'm sorry but watching Kelly Monaco dancing like that...was just effing hilarious...

I've never heard of her before (don't watch the soapies), but I thought he was going to throw her right across the dancefloor like that judge said!!

She was waaay too tiny and light for her partner!

I knew "Peterman" would ham it up good though! And was actually fairly impressed with Rachel Hunter's performance!! For a big tall girl, she did look quite graceful - considering she'd been hugging the Porcelain God all night long beforehand!

Brent88 · 06-02-2005, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pavanbadal

A good sign is that the show built in its second half hour -- meaning viewers liked what they saw. The first episode reairs again Sunday at 7pm.

WOW... maybe I was wrong. Afterall, over on the Zap2It boards I did predict ABC to be in 4th at 9pm... oh and I missed Supernanny winning 8pm.

What a huge dropoff for the Lost repeat though.

globalspot28 · 06-02-2005, 08:13 PM

I saw it, it wasn't too bad. I thought it was going to be cheesy. It is not something I would watch often, only if there was nothing else on, and last night, not much was on.

Pavan · 06-09-2005, 05:00 PM

Episode 2 grew from episode 1. ABC has yet another hit!

“Dancing with the Stars” (9:00-10:00 p.m.) Surging from its solid lead-in and gaining audience throughout its telecast, ABC’s “Dancing with the Stars” was again a dominant No. 1 in its time period. From 9:00-10:00 p.m., “Dancing with the Stars” beat its closest competition by 7.2 million viewers (14.9 million vs. 7.7 million - NBC) and by 96% among Adults 18-49 (4.7/14 vs. 2.4/7 - CBS).

* “Dancing with the Stars” stood as the No. 1 TV show of the night across all relevant demographic categories, including Total Viewers, Adults 25-54, Adults 18-49, Adults 18-34, Teens 12-17 and Kids 2-11.

* Growing from its week-earlier debut telecast by 1.4 million viewers and by 9% among Adults 18-49, the second airing of “Dancing with the Stars” drew ABC’s largest summertime audience in the time period since September 1995, nearly 10 years ago (since 9/13/95). The show matched ABC’s strongest Adult 18-49 performance in the hour during a summer frame in close to 6 years (9/1/99).

Brent88 · 06-09-2005, 06:02 PM

Impressive.

I bet we see this back in the Fall or at Mid-Season. If the rumored Alias pushback to January is true, then they could have another season for a few weeks then(November Sweeps anyone?). If it got anywhere close to those numbers, it'd be a competitive 2nd behind Survivor.

Pavan · 07-07-2005, 06:24 PM

The finale was huge last night. 21.8 million average. 14.0/23 rating and a 6.5 adult 18-49 rating. The 9:30pm half hour had 23.5 million viewers. I'm sure we'll see this again in November or the winter.

Pavan · 07-07-2005, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JT

I'm sorry but watching Kelly Monaco dancing like that...was just effing hilarious...

My how she has grown. She was awesome the last 2-3 weeks!

TripperFan · 07-07-2005, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pavanbadal

My how she has grown. She was awesome the last 2-3 weeks!

WASN'T SHE???!!! My husband sat down just as she was to go on last night (its the first he's watched any of it) and she blew his mind! Mine too! She really did deserve to win it! John O'Hurley was very good from the beginning, but to think she came from not being able to handle spins to that - wow!

Good job. And I stuck it out and ended up enjoying the whole series. I'll tune in again if and when they do a second "season".

Quite the surprise hit! (I'd like to hear what JT would say about her now too)

06-02-2005, 10:56 AM	#1
Pavan SO News/Reviews Director Administrator Forum Superstar Join Date: Feb 17, 2000 Location: Linden, NJ (Where Hal Linden got his last name from!) Posts: 26,821	Dancing With the Stars Scores in the Ratings 10.6/16 in the overnights, 13.23 million viewers and a 4.2/12 among adults 18-49. #1 for the night.
	__________________ SitcomsOnline.com News Blog -- The best news out there! SitcomsOnline.com DVD Reviews -- We are #1 in reviews!

06-02-2005, 12:46 PM	#2
Brent88 Member Forum Star Join Date: Aug 01, 2003 Location: Alabama Posts: 16,174	I found it boring. I'm suspecting there will be a big dropoff next week. Still... that's a lot better than I was expecting.
	__________________ Brent

06-02-2005, 01:15 PM	#3
TripperFan In God's Arms Now Forum Star Join Date: Sep 14, 2003 Location: Heartbreak Ridge Posts: 12,086	Its the one I chose (over that stupid Ashton thing about Geeks). Probably a big reason for the good ratings - there was just nothing else on at 9 last night! It wasn't bad - yea, maybe a little boring but it was kinda fun seeing Holyfield out there - and he wasn't too bad considering he's a heavyweight boxer!!! It could certainly hold his own on a regular dancefloor! I'd like to take a bazooka to the judges tho! Especially that snobby British guy <bitch slaps the old geezer >
	__________________ If I don't see you in this world, I'll meet you in the next one.....don't be late James Marshall Hendrix Voodoo Chile The Forum Legend formerly known as TripperFan "religion is for people who are afraid of hell--spirituality is for people who have been through hell"---anonymous

06-02-2005, 01:59 PM	#4
MIBabe03 Loving Swingtown! Forum 4000 Club Member Join Date: Jul 28, 2002 Location: TX Posts: 4,646	That show I'm not interested in at all.
	__________________ Laura and Mario November 10, 2006

06-02-2005, 05:45 PM	#7
JT Member Forum Veteran Join Date: Apr 29, 2001 Location: USA Posts: 7,223	I'm sorry but watching Kelly Monaco dancing like that...was just effing hilarious...
	__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEbJBFWIPk

06-02-2005, 05:34 PM	#6
Pavan SO News/Reviews Director Administrator Forum Superstar Join Date: Feb 17, 2000 Location: Linden, NJ (Where Hal Linden got his last name from!) Posts: 26,821	A good sign is that the show built in its second half hour -- meaning viewers liked what they saw. The first episode reairs again Sunday at 7pm.

06-02-2005, 08:13 PM	#10
globalspot28 Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jun 17, 2004 Posts: 168	I saw it, it wasn't too bad. I thought it was going to be cheesy. It is not something I would watch often, only if there was nothing else on, and last night, not much was on.
	__________________ ************************************** \| Strange News \| Entertainers in California \|**

06-09-2005, 05:00 PM	#11
Pavan SO News/Reviews Director Administrator Forum Superstar Join Date: Feb 17, 2000 Location: Linden, NJ (Where Hal Linden got his last name from!) Posts: 26,821	Episode 2 grew from episode 1. ABC has yet another hit! “Dancing with the Stars” (9:00-10:00 p.m.) Surging from its solid lead-in and gaining audience throughout its telecast, ABC’s “Dancing with the Stars” was again a dominant No. 1 in its time period. From 9:00-10:00 p.m., “Dancing with the Stars” beat its closest competition by 7.2 million viewers (14.9 million vs. 7.7 million - NBC) and by 96% among Adults 18-49 (4.7/14 vs. 2.4/7 - CBS). * “Dancing with the Stars” stood as the No. 1 TV show of the night across all relevant demographic categories, including Total Viewers, Adults 25-54, Adults 18-49, Adults 18-34, Teens 12-17 and Kids 2-11. * Growing from its week-earlier debut telecast by 1.4 million viewers and by 9% among Adults 18-49, the second airing of “Dancing with the Stars” drew ABC’s largest summertime audience in the time period since September 1995, nearly 10 years ago (since 9/13/95). The show matched ABC’s strongest Adult 18-49 performance in the hour during a summer frame in close to 6 years (9/1/99).

06-09-2005, 06:02 PM	#12
Brent88 Member Forum Star Join Date: Aug 01, 2003 Location: Alabama Posts: 16,174	Impressive. I bet we see this back in the Fall or at Mid-Season. If the rumored Alias pushback to January is true, then they could have another season for a few weeks then(November Sweeps anyone?). If it got anywhere close to those numbers, it'd be a competitive 2nd behind Survivor.

07-07-2005, 06:24 PM	#13
Pavan SO News/Reviews Director Administrator Forum Superstar Join Date: Feb 17, 2000 Location: Linden, NJ (Where Hal Linden got his last name from!) Posts: 26,821	The finale was huge last night. 21.8 million average. 14.0/23 rating and a 6.5 adult 18-49 rating. The 9:30pm half hour had 23.5 million viewers. I'm sure we'll see this again in November or the winter.