Why you think Paul Pollis is guilty - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

MetalHybrid · 04-22-2005, 11:54 PM

I will mention that bloodstain in his garage in the floor, but they can't compare it so they can't prove it is/was his wife's blood. This was talked about briefly on a previous thread. What are some more details that make you think he and his folks got away with murder?

compulsive dvd · 04-23-2005, 01:22 AM

This guy gave the absolute worst interview I have ever seen on the show. He gave a vibe that just said try and catch me.

Awsi Dooger · 04-23-2005, 03:34 AM

Which case is that? For some reason, I'm not connecting the name.

Based on the creepy interview description, I default to the guy whose wife disappeared and he supposedly went shopping with his little daughters. Then they suspected his parents of cleaning up the house. The back shed was locked and had footprints leading up to it indicating she might have been placed there. Now that guy was weird. If he ever goes to trial, i strongly recommend he doesn't testify, for his sake. I haven't seen the episode in months/years but can still hear his voice, "It's a shed..."

If that's not the case, so sorry. The name isn't one I automatically associate with a face and segment.

Kane · 04-23-2005, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Awsi Dooger

Which case is that? For some reason, I'm not connecting the name.

That's the 1994 disappearance of Charlotte Nagi Pollis, a resident of Girard, Ohio. She is profiled at the Doe Network site. You can go to that profile for more details on the case. Here is the link:

http://www.doenetwork.us/cases/1151dfoh.html

toddjharp · 04-23-2005, 03:01 PM

Problem is, it is rare for one to be convicted of murder without a body. If Charlotte has not been found for 11 years then her body probably will never be found.

On an earlier thread I started about this one, someone presented the theory of that maybe Charlotte's mother did it and asked if we noticed that she could not look the camera in the eye.

Also, in an interesting turn of events, Charlotte's daughter, Layla Pollis, was kidnapped in 1998 by Charlotte's mother.

Kane · 04-23-2005, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toddjharp

Problem is, it is rare for one to be convicted of murder without a body.

Although there are some cases in which someone was convicted of murder without a body, it is understandable that there is generally a lot of unwillingness to charge someone with a "no body" murder. If the person were acquitted and the victim's corpse was found after the fact, that person could not be retried for that same case, because of double jeopardy laws.

crystaldawn · 04-23-2005, 09:11 PM

I don't have any doubts that he is guilty. There is a very good chance that he had help though. Don't you just love it how he sticks up for his own family when he says "I didn't have anything to do with it, nor did my family have anything to do with it......that I know of." What a guy!

Awsi Dooger · 04-24-2005, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane

That's the 1994 disappearance of Charlotte Nagi Pollis, a resident of Girard, Ohio. She is profiled at the Doe Network site. You can go to that profile for more details on the case. Here is the link:

http://www.doenetwork.us/cases/1151dfoh.html

Thanks for the link, Kane. That is the case I was trying to describe in my earlier post. Your link helped refresh my memory.

Gad, she was 5-7 and 300 pounds. No wonder there is suspicion the other family members were involved. Otherwise, all you would have to do is check the hubby for back strain or worse. I didn't know they made sheds that big.

I'm finally starting to picture the husband, thanks to the quote from crystaldawn. Goofy brown mustache and unstable guy all around. Let's sick Nancy Grace on him.

MetalHybrid · 04-24-2005, 02:10 AM

There was a similar case that took place two years earlier in Oklahoma where two women and one of their daughters were last seen in a mall parking lot. The woman's family thought that the husband, named Chad, and his family were guilty of something. Your thoughts on this.

crystaldawn · 04-24-2005, 08:24 AM

Don't get me started on that story.......

It was the Wendy Camp story and the ex was so obviously guilty! I doubt too many people on the board will disagree with me on that. The only thing that has saved him and his mom (so far) is he discarded the bodies where no one has found them yet. I think the grandma, Ida, knew what was going to happen but had them drop her off not because of the arguing but so she wouldn't be directly involved. What I never understood is RS said someone who knows the family claims to have seen Cynthia (the little girl) several months after their disappearance. Police think this is a credible sighting. What? I, of course, hope she is alive and well but what are the chances? Plus if she was, she would be old enough to tell police what happened to her mom and aunt.

toddjharp · 04-24-2005, 04:45 PM

I think she was more like 5'2" and 300 pounds. That may have been a misprint. It's possible to put that all into a shed, but Paul definitely must have had help if that was the case.

Blackhawks2004 · 04-24-2005, 07:39 PM

My wife and I watched this segment and both think he is not guilty. The impression that I get is that her family is devistated by the loss of their daughter and are grabbing at anything. I really dont think the guy did it or had anything to do with it, but that's just me.

Ninjaman · 04-25-2005, 04:03 AM

It is possible that UM primarily presented the side of the story to show that he was guilty. However, how does one deal with the testimony of the daughter, where she said something about "we saw our mom's face in the bag"? At least the way that UM showed it, it seem pretty obvious that he had something to do with her disappearance.

toddjharp · 04-25-2005, 06:04 AM

According to the psychologist interviewed, he claimed that the child(ren) had been coached to say that. If so it may or may not be true.

crystaldawn · 04-25-2005, 11:04 AM

Also didn't he leave town for a while soon after she disappeared? I think it was right around the time he agreed to take a polygraph but then never showed up for it. He claims he left because of all the people driving by and staring. I always thought he could have been disposing of her body (if it was in the shed and then they moved it) while he was gone. If he truly thought his wife could possibly come back you would think he wouldn't have left town temporarily, he would have wanted to stick around in case she came back. But in my opinion, he knew she wasn't coming back.

04-22-2005, 11:54 PM	#1
MetalHybrid Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Mar 10, 2005 Location: Campbell(near San Jose), CA Posts: 141	Why you think Paul Pollis is guilty I will mention that bloodstain in his garage in the floor, but they can't compare it so they can't prove it is/was his wife's blood. This was talked about briefly on a previous thread. What are some more details that make you think he and his folks got away with murder?

04-24-2005, 02:10 AM	#9
MetalHybrid Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Mar 10, 2005 Location: Campbell(near San Jose), CA Posts: 141	similar case There was a similar case that took place two years earlier in Oklahoma where two women and one of their daughters were last seen in a mall parking lot. The woman's family thought that the husband, named Chad, and his family were guilty of something. Your thoughts on this.

04-25-2005, 11:04 AM	#15
crystaldawn Member Forum 4000 Club Member Join Date: Dec 17, 2002 Location: Illinois Posts: 4,261	Also didn't he leave town for a while soon after she disappeared? I think it was right around the time he agreed to take a polygraph but then never showed up for it. He claims he left because of all the people driving by and staring. I always thought he could have been disposing of her body (if it was in the shed and then they moved it) while he was gone. If he truly thought his wife could possibly come back you would think he wouldn't have left town temporarily, he would have wanted to stick around in case she came back. But in my opinion, he knew she wasn't coming back.
	Last edited by crystaldawn; 04-25-2005 at 11:47 AM. Reason: typo

04-23-2005, 01:22 AM	#2
compulsive dvd Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jan 27, 2005 Posts: 184	This guy gave the absolute worst interview I have ever seen on the show. He gave a vibe that just said try and catch me.

04-23-2005, 03:34 AM	#3
Awsi Dooger Member Senior Member Join Date: Feb 18, 2003 Location: Miami Posts: 1,537	Which case is that? For some reason, I'm not connecting the name. Based on the creepy interview description, I default to the guy whose wife disappeared and he supposedly went shopping with his little daughters. Then they suspected his parents of cleaning up the house. The back shed was locked and had footprints leading up to it indicating she might have been placed there. Now that guy was weird. If he ever goes to trial, i strongly recommend he doesn't testify, for his sake. I haven't seen the episode in months/years but can still hear his voice, "It's a shed..." If that's not the case, so sorry. The name isn't one I automatically associate with a face and segment.

04-23-2005, 03:01 PM	#5
toddjharp Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jan 27, 2005 Posts: 35	Problem is, it is rare for one to be convicted of murder without a body. If Charlotte has not been found for 11 years then her body probably will never be found. On an earlier thread I started about this one, someone presented the theory of that maybe Charlotte's mother did it and asked if we noticed that she could not look the camera in the eye. Also, in an interesting turn of events, Charlotte's daughter, Layla Pollis, was kidnapped in 1998 by Charlotte's mother.

04-23-2005, 09:11 PM	#7
crystaldawn Member Forum 4000 Club Member Join Date: Dec 17, 2002 Location: Illinois Posts: 4,261	I don't have any doubts that he is guilty. There is a very good chance that he had help though. Don't you just love it how he sticks up for his own family when he says "I didn't have anything to do with it, nor did my family have anything to do with it......that I know of." What a guy!

04-24-2005, 08:24 AM	#10
crystaldawn Member Forum 4000 Club Member Join Date: Dec 17, 2002 Location: Illinois Posts: 4,261	Don't get me started on that story....... It was the Wendy Camp story and the ex was so obviously guilty! I doubt too many people on the board will disagree with me on that. The only thing that has saved him and his mom (so far) is he discarded the bodies where no one has found them yet. I think the grandma, Ida, knew what was going to happen but had them drop her off not because of the arguing but so she wouldn't be directly involved. What I never understood is RS said someone who knows the family claims to have seen Cynthia (the little girl) several months after their disappearance. Police think this is a credible sighting. What? I, of course, hope she is alive and well but what are the chances? Plus if she was, she would be old enough to tell police what happened to her mom and aunt.

04-24-2005, 04:45 PM	#11
toddjharp Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jan 27, 2005 Posts: 35	I think she was more like 5'2" and 300 pounds. That may have been a misprint. It's possible to put that all into a shed, but Paul definitely must have had help if that was the case.

04-24-2005, 07:39 PM	#12
Blackhawks2004 Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Sep 25, 2004 Location: Cincinnati, OH Posts: 15	My wife and I watched this segment and both think he is not guilty. The impression that I get is that her family is devistated by the loss of their daughter and are grabbing at anything. I really dont think the guy did it or had anything to do with it, but that's just me.

04-25-2005, 04:03 AM	#13
Ninjaman Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Feb 15, 2003 Location: remote island in pacific Posts: 103	It is possible that UM primarily presented the side of the story to show that he was guilty. However, how does one deal with the testimony of the daughter, where she said something about "we saw our mom's face in the bag"? At least the way that UM showed it, it seem pretty obvious that he had something to do with her disappearance.

04-25-2005, 06:04 AM	#14
toddjharp Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jan 27, 2005 Posts: 35	According to the psychologist interviewed, he claimed that the child(ren) had been coached to say that. If so it may or may not be true.