Little Miss Panasoffkee - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

themaninblack · 03-30-2005, 12:49 AM

did they ever find out who ms. panasofkee was? as i remember it, they said she had had at least one child, after they found her in a swamp or something

Ninjaman · 03-30-2005, 03:32 AM

Not that I'm aware of. This case has been mentioned many times on this board, and so if you were to do a search, you could find out a lot of information. This was a sad case, and the details you mentioned were correct. Not only that, but she had had some type of ankle surgery as well, and they said that she could have been of Native American descent. They found her under the Panasoffkee overpass in Florida with a belt around her neck. That's all I know at this point, and I somehow doubt that the case will be solved now after so many years. Terrible.

DF Justin · 03-31-2005, 03:32 AM

one of the cases that has stayed with me for years...

Kane · 03-31-2005, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ninjaman

Not that I'm aware of. This case has been mentioned many times on this board, and so if you were to do a search, you could find out a lot of information. This was a sad case, and the details you mentioned were correct. Not only that, but she had had some type of ankle surgery as well, and they said that she could have been of Native American descent. They found her under the Panasoffkee overpass in Florida with a belt around her neck. That's all I know at this point, and I somehow doubt that the case will be solved now after so many years. Terrible.

I've pointed this out before, and I'll do it again: Just because a case has been unsolved for decades DOES NOT mean that it could never be solved.

It may not be solved today, tomorrow, next week, or what have you. But there's always some chance of a resolution.

Ninjaman · 04-01-2005, 07:25 AM

Kane,

I don't disagree with you. I should have worded my comment a little differently. Of course there is the possibility of it being solved. We all hope for that. What I should have said is that all anyone seems to know about this case is what was profiled on UM, which may be incomplete at best. From what I understand, people have done web searches for this case and have come up with nothing. What does that mean? How active is the investigation at this point? These are questions that need to be asked when talking about the likelihood of a case being solved.

The Barbs · 04-01-2005, 09:38 AM

Is Ms. Panasoffkee on the Doe network site? I couldn't find anything about her. I have another question for Kane. Are you a member of the Doe network? Just curious. Thanks.

Kane · 04-01-2005, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Barbs

Is Ms. Panasoffkee on the Doe network site? I couldn't find anything about her. I have another question for Kane. Are you a member of the Doe network? Just curious. Thanks.

No, Barbs, I'm sorry to say that I'm not a member of the Doe network. I just simply came across that site at one time, and noticed that the site includes numerous missing persons who were profiled on UM.

So far, I haven't found any links related to Ms. Panasoffkee, who doesn't appear to be listed at Doe Network. However, DN contains profiles of missing persons who disappeared sometime before Ms. Panasoffkee was discovered dead (which was in early 1971). So it wouldn't be entirely impossible for any of those persons to have been her. One never knows.

shock80 · 04-02-2005, 04:11 AM

You dont have to be rude to people. U sate this or that once and u will mention it again, who are u King ****? People can express their own opinions, like em or not...

Kane · 04-02-2005, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shock80

You dont have to be rude to people. U sate this or that once and u will mention it again, who are u King ****? People can express their own opinions, like em or not...

On the contrary, I wasn't being rude. I'm just making a point of something. Plus, I wasn't trying to deprive anyone of expressing their opinion (even though some of the opinions other people have stated are not entirely informed).

Besides, you can't determine whether someone is rude based solely on what they typed. When someone types, it doesn't neccessarily say whether they were being polite. Maybe they expressed an opinion rudely, but then again, maybe they didn't. It's not what you say, but how you say it.

nohwheregirl · 04-03-2005, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shock80

You dont have to be rude to people. U sate this or that once and u will mention it again, who are u King ****? People can express their own opinions, like em or not...

You have a pretty well-documented history of being rude on this discussion board, Shock80. It's like the troll calling the kettle black...or was it the pot? I always get these things mixed up.

Back to the topic at hand, I think this case is especially unfortunate because there are just so many unidentified persons out there like her. If someone is not actively looking for her, the chances of the case being solved look pretty grim. I guess the best we can do at this point is hope that there is someone alive who knows her and cares about her. It's sad to think that there might not be anyone that fits that description.

shock80 · 04-03-2005, 05:13 AM

Well Kane its nice that you keep us informed but to talk down to people on here intentional or not is rude.

I agree that Ms. Pancake would be solved. Its been since 1971. The case is closed, its over with, the stature of limitation is passed.

So u can repeat yourself once more on the board if you wish and state as you siad before, that there's always hope.

Hope is all gone in that case... Sorry to burst your bubble.

As for you nowhere girl, again you werent spoken too and u put your worthless two sense into my conversation again.

How about you keep the comments to yourself unless directly spoken too. As for the pot and the kettle, I'll give you a perfect place to put it.

DeeeNah · 04-03-2005, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shock80

Well Kane its nice that you keep us informed but to talk down to people on here intentional or not is rude.

I agree that Ms. Pancake would be solved. Its been since 1971. The case is closed, its over with, the stature of limitation is passed.

So u can repeat yourself once more on the board if you wish and state as you siad before, that there's always hope.

Hope is all gone in that case... Sorry to burst your bubble.

As for you nowhere girl, again you werent spoken too and u put your worthless two sense into my conversation again.

How about you keep the comments to yourself unless directly spoken too. As for the pot and the kettle, I'll give you a perfect place to put it.

http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/...d.php?t=135266

Kane · 04-03-2005, 01:21 PM

[QUOTE=shock80]Well Kane its nice that you keep us informed but to talk down to people on here intentional or not is rude.

I agree that Ms. Pancake would be solved. Its been since 1971. The case is closed, its over with, the stature of limitation is passed.

So u can repeat yourself once more on the board if you wish and state as you siad before, that there's always hope.

Hope is all gone in that case... Sorry to burst your bubble. QUOTE]

What statute of limitation? There's no statue of limitations on murder.

And believe me, it was never my intention to talk down to people, or to be rude to any extent. Besides, I haven't done any name-calling here. And like I said earlier, it's not what you say, but how you say it. Don't judge someone unless you know for sure what their state of mind was when they typed a message. I mean, you weren't present when I typed the message.

As for hope being "all gone" in the Panosoffkee case, do you know that for a fact? I don't know that for a fact, and I seriously doubt that anyone else does.

shock80 · 04-09-2005, 06:09 AM

I ve read and I do know that it wont be solved, its closed, see ya ms pano

Ninjaman · 04-09-2005, 02:39 PM

I'm just curious, Schock80, what is the information that you are referring to that leads you to believe that it won't be solved? I'm curious about the case in general, and would like to know more. I'm sure everyone else would as well. Thanks.

03-30-2005, 12:49 AM	#1
themaninblack Member Forum Regular Join Date: Mar 08, 2005 Posts: 573	Little Miss Panasoffkee did they ever find out who ms. panasofkee was? as i remember it, they said she had had at least one child, after they found her in a swamp or something

04-02-2005, 04:11 AM	#8
shock80 Banned Banned!! Occasional Poster Join Date: Feb 20, 2005 Posts: 40	Kane You dont have to be rude to people. U sate this or that once and u will mention it again, who are u King ****? People can express their own opinions, like em or not...

04-03-2005, 05:13 AM	#11
shock80 Banned Banned!! Occasional Poster Join Date: Feb 20, 2005 Posts: 40	rude? Well Kane its nice that you keep us informed but to talk down to people on here intentional or not is rude. I agree that Ms. Pancake would be solved. Its been since 1971. The case is closed, its over with, the stature of limitation is passed. So u can repeat yourself once more on the board if you wish and state as you siad before, that there's always hope. Hope is all gone in that case... Sorry to burst your bubble. As for you nowhere girl, again you werent spoken too and u put your worthless two sense into my conversation again. How about you keep the comments to yourself unless directly spoken too. As for the pot and the kettle, I'll give you a perfect place to put it.

04-09-2005, 06:09 AM	#14
shock80 Banned Banned!! Occasional Poster Join Date: Feb 20, 2005 Posts: 40	I do know I ve read and I do know that it wont be solved, its closed, see ya ms pano

03-30-2005, 03:32 AM	#2
Ninjaman Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Feb 15, 2003 Location: remote island in pacific Posts: 103	Not that I'm aware of. This case has been mentioned many times on this board, and so if you were to do a search, you could find out a lot of information. This was a sad case, and the details you mentioned were correct. Not only that, but she had had some type of ankle surgery as well, and they said that she could have been of Native American descent. They found her under the Panasoffkee overpass in Florida with a belt around her neck. That's all I know at this point, and I somehow doubt that the case will be solved now after so many years. Terrible.

03-31-2005, 03:32 AM	#3
DF Justin Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Sep 28, 2004 Location: boston ma Posts: 44	one of the cases that has stayed with me for years...

04-01-2005, 07:25 AM	#5
Ninjaman Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Feb 15, 2003 Location: remote island in pacific Posts: 103	Kane, I don't disagree with you. I should have worded my comment a little differently. Of course there is the possibility of it being solved. We all hope for that. What I should have said is that all anyone seems to know about this case is what was profiled on UM, which may be incomplete at best. From what I understand, people have done web searches for this case and have come up with nothing. What does that mean? How active is the investigation at this point? These are questions that need to be asked when talking about the likelihood of a case being solved.

04-01-2005, 09:38 AM	#6
The Barbs Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jun 25, 2004 Posts: 62	Is Ms. Panasoffkee on the Doe network site? I couldn't find anything about her. I have another question for Kane. Are you a member of the Doe network? Just curious. Thanks.

04-03-2005, 01:21 PM	#13
Kane Member Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Mar 07, 2001 Location: MA, United States Posts: 3,367	[QUOTE=shock80]Well Kane its nice that you keep us informed but to talk down to people on here intentional or not is rude. I agree that Ms. Pancake would be solved. Its been since 1971. The case is closed, its over with, the stature of limitation is passed. So u can repeat yourself once more on the board if you wish and state as you siad before, that there's always hope. Hope is all gone in that case... Sorry to burst your bubble. QUOTE] What statute of limitation? There's no statue of limitations on murder. And believe me, it was never my intention to talk down to people, or to be rude to any extent. Besides, I haven't done any name-calling here. And like I said earlier, it's not what you say, but how you say it. Don't judge someone unless you know for sure what their state of mind was when they typed a message. I mean, you weren't present when I typed the message. As for hope being "all gone" in the Panosoffkee case, do you know that for a fact? I don't know that for a fact, and I seriously doubt that anyone else does.

04-09-2005, 02:39 PM	#15
Ninjaman Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Feb 15, 2003 Location: remote island in pacific Posts: 103	I'm just curious, Schock80, what is the information that you are referring to that leads you to believe that it won't be solved? I'm curious about the case in general, and would like to know more. I'm sure everyone else would as well. Thanks.