View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
View Latest Threads in Game Shows / Game Shows Photo Galleries
General Game Shows News and Discussion / Bingo Blitz / Card Sharks / The Chase / Concentration / Classic Concenration / The Dating Game / Love Connection / Dating Game Shows / Deal or No Deal / Family Feud / The Gong Show / Hollywood Squares / Jeopardy! / The Joker's Wild / Let's Make a Deal / Lingo / Match Game / Name That Tune / The Newlywed Game / Password / Press Your Luck / The Price Is Right / Pyramid / The $100,000 Pyramid / Sale of the Century / Scrabble / Supermarket Sweep / Tic-Tac-Dough / To Tell the Truth / Trivial Pursuit / Weakest Link / What's My Line? / Wheel of Fortune / Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? / Reality TV Shows / America's Funniest Home Videos (AFV) / American Gladiators
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Sep 24, 2003
Posts: 392
|
On the Weakest Link, there seems to be a good strategy that for some reason, is rarely if ever implemented by the contestants.
When there are only three contestants remaining, does it make sense to purposely play dumb and answer all your questions incorrectly, especially if youhave been one of the stronger links in the previous rounds? That way, it is less likely that the other two contestants will gang up on you and vote you off. It is obvious that the contestants don't want to compete with a smart person in the final round when it's only two people, so the strongest link when there's three people left always seems to get voted off. But I don't think I've ever seen a strong link on the show purposely play dumb when there's only three remaining, even though it makes a lot of sense to do so. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|