MISSING WIFE--Christi Nichols Case

[hostedbyrobertstack]

Originally Posted by MissKitka731

Speaking of social media, check out what I found on Mark Nichols' (public) page...





Takes tasteless to a WHOLE new level....

Yeah, wow...it's unfortunate that these people will not just admit or let the family know where the body is. Obviously he did it and it's amazing people can live with that every day.

[LooksLikeCRicci]

I want to punch that man in the groin. So hard.

[Hot Jock]

Originally Posted by MissKitka731

Speaking of social media, check out what I found on Mark Nichols' (public) page...





Takes tasteless to a WHOLE new level....

Public you say? I've searched high and low and cannot find his profile. If you (or anybody else) could PM me a direct link to his page I would greatly appreciate it ever so much.

[LooksLikeCRicci]

Originally Posted by Hot Jock

Public you say? I've searched high and low and cannot find his profile. If you (or anybody else) could PM me a direct link to his page I would greatly appreciate it ever so much.

Oh, if you troll him, please let me know:

[Hot Jock]

Originally Posted by Hot Jock

Public you say? I've searched high and low and cannot find his profile. If you (or anybody else) could PM me a direct link to his page I would greatly appreciate it ever so much.

Disregard this. I found his sorry ass.

[DazzlerSparkler]

Not defending this trash, but it looks like he shared it from another woman post in it. Also do we even know the context?

That bein said its time for the urn with you Mark

[LilMissKryssy]

I've always wondered why procescutors don't just charge Mark with her murder. It's been 30 years. The odds of her body surfacing without Mark confessing is highly unlikely. The circumstancial evidence is pretty convincing...history of domestic violence with hospital reports, friends/family, lawyer etc. Also, he was the last one to see her alive (just so happens after she met with a lawyer), babysitter never saw her enter the home, blood in the bedroom/car which turns out to be hers, he NEVER asked her grandmother if she had seen/heard from kristi even though he went looking for her? Point is, the circumstantial evidence is very convincing. Also, 30 years later? She's dead. That's all the proof I'd need she's dead. A devoted mother who just decided never to see her children again?

[LilMissKryssy]

Instead of that meme, he should've reposted a law office by the name of "Killher, Buryher and Lye."

[LooksLikeCRicci]

Originally Posted by LilMissKryssy

Instead of that meme, he should've reposted a law office by the name of "Killher, Buryher and Lye."

HA! Love it.

[Huskerz85]

Originally Posted by MissKitka731

Speaking of social media, check out what I found on Mark Nichols' (public) page...





Takes tasteless to a WHOLE new level....

Fits in well with this analysis of the case

https://crimeshop.org/2015/11/11/did...ill-be-solved/

[Axl Rose]

Originally Posted by MissKitka731

Speaking of social media, check out what I found on Mark Nichols' (public) page...





Takes tasteless to a WHOLE new level....

LMAO

[Drakken]

Originally Posted by LilMissKryssy

I've always wondered why procescutors don't just charge Mark with her murder. It's been 30 years. The odds of her body surfacing without Mark confessing is highly unlikely. The circumstancial evidence is pretty convincing...history of domestic violence with hospital reports, friends/family, lawyer etc. Also, he was the last one to see her alive (just so happens after she met with a lawyer), babysitter never saw her enter the home, blood in the bedroom/car which turns out to be hers, he NEVER asked her grandmother if she had seen/heard from kristi even though he went looking for her? Point is, the circumstantial evidence is very convincing. Also, 30 years later? She's dead. That's all the proof I'd need she's dead. A devoted mother who just decided never to see her children again?

99.9% sure it is because they do not have enough evidence on Mark to secure even an indictment in front of a Grand Jury, let alone a guilty verdict.

Remember, prosecutors must prove there was a crime and that Mark (and no one else) did it. Beyond a reasonable doubt means that the evidence must corroborate no other story but the one presented by the prosecutor. Otherwise, there is still a reasonable doubt.

All Mark has to do, is to argue that she has abandoned her husband and her family for 30 years, without giving any trace of her whereabouts. What does the prosecution have to counter this? Not a lot, and it is the prosecution who has the burden of proof. There are too many grey areas that Mark can weasel his way out of if cornered, and there is no real evidence beyond reasonable doubt (except the blood evidence) that a crime might even have been committed under corpus delecti. Her body is not needed, however serious material proof that she was killed is needed.

[Huskerz85]

Originally Posted by Drakken

99.9% sure it is because they do not have enough evidence on Mark to secure even an indictment in front of a Grand Jury, let alone a guilty verdict.

Remember, prosecutors must prove there was a crime and that Mark (and no one else) did it. Beyond a reasonable doubt means that the evidence must corroborate no other story but the one presented by the prosecutor. Otherwise, there is still a reasonable doubt.

All Mark has to do, is to argue that she has abandoned her husband and her family for 30 years, without giving any trace of her whereabouts. What does the prosecution have to counter this? Not a lot, and it is the prosecution who has the burden of proof. There are too many grey areas that Mark can weasel his way out of if cornered, and there is no real evidence beyond reasonable doubt (except the blood evidence) that a crime might even have been committed under corpus delecti. Her body is not needed, however serious material proof that she was killed is needed.

I'm surprised I didn't think of this until now, but this bears some similarities to another case that happened here in 2006

http://unidentified.wikia.com/wiki/Jessica_O%27Grady

(only difference between the two being, the sheriff found a large amt. of the victim's blood on the likely murder weapon - no weapon was ever found relating back to Nichols)

Going back to this case, I doubt any more that you'll find any material evidence. My bet is the only way this will be solved is if some farmer or hunter unearths bones somewhere....

[RedBasket]

Just watched the full version on Prime today. Mark is such a dim bulb and comes off as heartless. "People think I am violent person...." Ugh - just shut up and come up with a better lie. The whole suitcase thing still makes me laugh - what husband can tell what a woman packs down to such detail? Not many and my hubby knows me like the back of his hand. He could probably say a few things that would be be in my suitcase but not that much......

[drew790]

Yeeeeeah, I have no doubts on this one. Surprises me looking at the FB that he seems to still have all the family support. No one's like "you killed my mom?"