1996 Unsolved Murder of Blair Adams

[mwcarolina]

Originally Posted by bigted12

as for my theory? i don't have one, sometimes being humble enough to simply say "i don't know" is best..

instead of inventing all kinds of insane theories trying to make something, anything fit...

How can you not have a theory?? Shouldn’t everyone have one on a case as mysterious as this??

[bigted12]

Originally Posted by mwcarolina

How can you not have a theory?? Shouldn’t everyone have one on a case as mysterious as this??

The reason why i "like" this case so much, is that because no matter what theory you have, theres a dozen things that tell you that it doesn't make sense.

when it comes to 99% of the cases on UM you can come up with a reasonable theory, maybe you'd be wrong, but it adds up.

when it comes to blair adams, cindy james and charles morgan, and maybe a few others you can't really come to a rational conclusion. the problem that we have is that few people are humble enough to simply say "i don't know"

i've seen countless people here come to a theory on a case, and in order to make it fit, they've invented medical histories, future plans, relationships, complete scenarios for people who they've never met for cases that happened 45 years ago... and theres zero proof for any of it.

having a theory is one thing, reasonably trying to figure out what someone did next is great... but people are inventing entire back stories, future plans, family problems, medical diagnosis for people they've never met.

of course i don't have a real theory when it comes to blair, because nothing adds up.

the only thing we can all agree on is that he was clearly paranoid...he thought someone was out to get him, then he just happens to get murdered... thats some coincidence...

but i also don't believe that someone would have followed him thousands of miles on 2 planes, 2 hire cars to do it...

i also don't believe that someone as paranoid and scared as blair would go get a male hooker, put himself in the most vunerable situation ever, and that the male hooker wouldn't take the 1000s of dollars next to the body, right?

so no, i don't have a theory!, i dont see much point in inventing some insane theory, just to have a theory...

[StackTime]

Originally Posted by bigted12

The reason why i "like" this case so much, is that because no matter what theory you have, theres a dozen things that tell you that it doesn't make sense.

when it comes to 99% of the cases on UM you can come up with a reasonable theory, maybe you'd be wrong, but it adds up.

when it comes to blair adams, cindy james and charles morgan, and maybe a few others you can't really come to a rational conclusion. the problem that we have is that few people are humble enough to simply say "i don't know"

i've seen countless people here come to a theory on a case, and in order to make it fit, they've invented medical histories, future plans, relationships, complete scenarios for people who they've never met for cases that happened 45 years ago... and theres zero proof for any of it.

having a theory is one thing, reasonably trying to figure out what someone did next is great... but people are inventing entire back stories, future plans, family problems, medical diagnosis for people they've never met.

of course i don't have a real theory when it comes to blair, because nothing adds up.

the only thing we can all agree on is that he was clearly paranoid...he thought someone was out to get him, then he just happens to get murdered... thats some coincidence...

but i also don't believe that someone would have followed him thousands of miles on 2 planes, 2 hire cars to do it...

i also don't believe that someone as paranoid and scared as blair would go get a male hooker, put himself in the most vunerable situation ever, and that the male hooker wouldn't take the 1000s of dollars next to the body, right?

so no, i don't have a theory!, i dont see much point in inventing some insane theory, just to have a theory...

I think Cindy James should be left out here. Can't prove it but a strong theory is that she was engaging in another self-harm episode for attention - but simply went too far by accident.

[bigted12]

Originally Posted by StackTime

I think Cindy James should be left out here. Can't prove it but a strong theory is that she was engaging in another self-harm episode for attention - but simply went too far by accident.

I agree that cindy was very "problematic", there was something off about her even before this, i mean isn't there even some doubt that she invented a boyfriend who had cancer? she definitely didn't help herself, she told her parents that she knows something but can't say, her behaviour was strange..

but i think it's too easy to say she did all this for attention, her neighbors witnessed the fire in her basement and then a man outside who fled in the middle of the night, the way she was found is way too elaborate for some broad looking for attention. putting a knife through your hand is way over the top, that wouldn't be for attention, that would be something way worse.

I understand why people think that cindy did it to herself, but i still think theres things that dont add up.

when a case is very clear cut, people don't discuss it, this case is the one of the most discussed from the show.