I still don't get how I was the only one who got into trouble for Alimony posts? - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

Janice Johnson · 11-25-2023, 06:37 AM

On another Website, a Poster said something like,"I was gambling in a Casino when the guy next to me won a $4,000 Jackpot. He begged me to switch seats with him and he would give me $2,000 to claim the Jackpot as my own. I did and he paid me the $2,000, but now I'm thinking maybe I shouldn't have done that because it was weird that he begged a complete Stranger to claim the Jackpot for $2,000. Why wouldn't he want his entire $4,000?"

A Poster replied something like,"He probably didn't want to claim the $4,000 himself because he could have Alimony Payments. I don't even know what Alimony is, but it sounds awful."

I (Janice Johnson) responded something like,"Alimony is something you pay an ex spouse after divorce. I've always hated the idea of Alimony, especially if the reason for the divorce in the first place is because the paying spouse was cheated on. Why should someone have to financially support another Adult they are no longer legally bonded to especially if the reason for the divorce was because they got cheated on? Why should they pay someone who cheated on them? Hell no!"

Someone else responded,"Alimony is like buying oats for a horse you no longer own " Another Poster said something like," My Friend didn't sign a Prenup and his ex wife cheated on him. He divorced her because of her affair and he has to pay her $2,000 every month." I, Janice Johnson responded,"Alimony sucks! It should be outlawed!"

I soon went to another thread and tried to respond but I couldn't. I assumed it was a glitch. I went back to the Jackpot Thread and an Admin wrote something like,"You have hijacked this thread twice by mentioning Alimony twice. It's about a guy trying to hide his Jackpot and asking a complete Stranger to claim it for him for half the Jackpot, not about Alimony. You have received a two week Suspension for Hijacking."

I(Janice Johnson) was like,"I wonder who got Suspended for making a Alimony hijack. I know it's not me because I haven't done anything wrong." I then saw in horror that it WAS me who got a two week Suspension for Hijacking with Alimony!

And the Admin had chosen to only quote MY responses, making it unfairly look like I just brought up Alimony out of nowhere, didn't even include the posts I responded to.

Posters said something like,"Janice Johnson didn't hijack anything. The reason she brought up Alimony twice was because she was responding to two different people who brought it up first. She doesn't deserve a two week Suspension. You've done worse things. If anything, the people who brought up Alimony first should be the ones who get a two week Suspension, not Janice Johnson. You owe Janice Johnson an immediate reinstatement and a full apology for this unfair two week Suspension. "

The unfair two week Suspension still stuck despite multiple Posters protesting the two week Suspension. After I came back after the unfair two week Suspension, Posters were like,"Janice Johnson is a lot stronger than I am. I would have personally permanently left after that unfair two week Alimony Suspension."

I still don't get how I was the only one who got into trouble for the Alimony thing when I was responding to two different people who brought it up first.

Caroline13 · 11-25-2023, 01:29 PM

Janice Johnson: Another 'woe is me' story drama, hope you will figure it out.

Janice Johnson · 11-25-2023, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caroline13

Janice Johnson: Another 'woe is me' story drama, hope you will figure it out.

You don't find it odd and unfair that I was the only one who got a Suspension for this despite me merely responding to people who brought it up first?

Dude111 · 11-25-2023, 04:08 PM

I hope its ok Janice

Caroline13 · 11-25-2023, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janice Johnson

You don't find it odd and unfair that I was the only one who got a Suspension for this despite me merely responding to people who brought it up first?

I won't spin my wheels "trying" to get into other's minds...and for sure moderators....I have had my share of nasty moderation and bans... I had a moderator yrs ago who befriended me and then before I went much further, I was thrown under the bus.......

Dude111 · 11-27-2023, 12:44 AM

Wasnt that on CD Carole??

They are horrible and dont deserve a site!!

Caroline13 · 11-27-2023, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111

Wasnt that on CD Carole??

They are horrible and dont deserve a site!!

Yep and have no desire to go back there. I've said this before they are heavy duty funded and love pharma generally,, and I am the opposite and they don't like that.

Another site I was a member after hip replacement ordeal, didn't like to hear negative outcomes from these surgeries and my outcome was negtative, they I heard was also funded by Big Medicine, and they got rid of me.

Furienna · 11-30-2023, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janice Johnson

On another Website, a Poster said something like,"I was gambling in a Casino when the guy next to me won a $4,000 Jackpot. He begged me to switch seats with him and he would give me $2,000 to claim the Jackpot as my own. I did and he paid me the $2,000, but now I'm thinking maybe I shouldn't have done that because it was weird that he begged a complete Stranger to claim the Jackpot for $2,000. Why wouldn't he want his entire $4,000?"

A Poster replied something like,"He probably didn't want to claim the $4,000 himself because he could have Alimony Payments. I don't even know what Alimony is, but it sounds awful."

I (Janice Johnson) responded something like,"Alimony is something you pay an ex spouse after divorce. I've always hated the idea of Alimony, especially if the reason for the divorce in the first place is because the paying spouse was cheated on. Why should someone have to financially support another Adult they are no longer legally bonded to especially if the reason for the divorce was because they got cheated on? Why should they pay someone who cheated on them? Hell no!"

Someone else responded,"Alimony is like buying oats for a horse you no longer own " Another Poster said something like," My Friend didn't sign a Prenup and his ex wife cheated on him. He divorced her because of her affair and he has to pay her $2,000 every month." I, Janice Johnson responded,"Alimony sucks! It should be outlawed!"

I soon went to another thread and tried to respond but I couldn't. I assumed it was a glitch. I went back to the Jackpot Thread and an Admin wrote something like,"You have hijacked this thread twice by mentioning Alimony twice. It's about a guy trying to hide his Jackpot and asking a complete Stranger to claim it for him for half the Jackpot, not about Alimony. You have received a two week Suspension for Hijacking."

I(Janice Johnson) was like,"I wonder who got Suspended for making a Alimony hijack. I know it's not me because I haven't done anything wrong." I then saw in horror that it WAS me who got a two week Suspension for Hijacking with Alimony!

And the Admin had chosen to only quote MY responses, making it unfairly look like I just brought up Alimony out of nowhere, didn't even include the posts I responded to.

Posters said something like,"Janice Johnson didn't hijack anything. The reason she brought up Alimony twice was because she was responding to two different people who brought it up first. She doesn't deserve a two week Suspension. You've done worse things. If anything, the people who brought up Alimony first should be the ones who get a two week Suspension, not Janice Johnson. You owe Janice Johnson an immediate reinstatement and a full apology for this unfair two week Suspension. "

The unfair two week Suspension still stuck despite multiple Posters protesting the two week Suspension. After I came back after the unfair two week Suspension, Posters were like,"Janice Johnson is a lot stronger than I am. I would have personally permanently left after that unfair two week Alimony Suspension."

I still don't get how I was the only one who got into trouble for the Alimony thing when I was responding to two different people who brought it up first.

Sometimes, moderators are just dumb.
Besides, I agree with you about alimony (but it doesn't exist here in Sweden anyway).

Janice Johnson · 12-02-2023, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Furienna

Sometimes, moderators are just dumb.
Besides, I agree with you about alimony (but it doesn't exist here in Sweden anyway).

I don't get how someone who CHEATED gets Alimony?

If the divorce happened because of cheating, the cheating person shouldn't get Alimony. If anything, the cheating person should have to pay Alimony to the ex spouse who was faithful.

IllinoisTVFan · 12-02-2023, 09:06 PM

For the most part, alimony is a scam and yes should be outlawed. If a spouse cheats they shouldn't get it at all, should only be for those who were stay-at-home spouses and only used until they can get on their feet. Lifetime alimony needs to disappear. What site was this on? Sounds like City-Data, I used to get infractions and eventually banned for the stupidest things.

Furienna · 12-03-2023, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janice Johnson

I don't get how someone who CHEATED gets Alimony?

If the divorce happened because of cheating, the cheating person shouldn't get Alimony. If anything, the cheating person should have to pay Alimony to the ex spouse who was faithful.

Yeah, I really don't get why alimony still exists and how a cheating spouse can get it.

Janice Johnson · 12-05-2023, 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Furienna

Yeah, I really don't get why alimony still exists and how a cheating spouse can get it.

Makes zero sense for a cheating spouse to get Alimony.

I 100 percent agree with you.

Furienna · 12-05-2023, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janice Johnson

Makes zero sense for a cheating spouse to get Alimony.

I 100 percent agree with you.

It is hardly strange that alimony doesn't exist here in Sweden anymore, if it ever did.
It is much stranger that it still exists in the US.

Caroline13 · 12-05-2023, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Furienna

Yeah, I really don't get why alimony still exists and how a cheating spouse can get it.

The Cheating half is historically the MALE half and the one who makes the most money....it costs Money to cheat....and keep so many females happy with the cheaters...Moms are primary caregivers of the children and how can they make money to cheat???/ Good Grief, how unthinking can so many be????

How about the population difference in the 2 countries,,,,Sweden has a little over 10Million, US over 330Million. Look at the whole pictures....

Caroline13 · 12-05-2023, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllinoisTVFan

For the most part, alimony is a scam and yes should be outlawed. If a spouse cheats they shouldn't get it at all, should only be for those who were stay-at-home spouses and only used until they can get on their feet. Lifetime alimony needs to disappear. What site was this on? Sounds like City-Data, I used to get infractions and eventually banned for the stupidest things.

Ah sage advice from a person who must have a lot of experiene with being married, cheating, being cheated on, having and raising children, No????

11-25-2023, 06:37 AM	#1
Janice Johnson Commercial Lover Forum 4000 Club Member Join Date: May 30, 2003 Location: Miami, Florida Posts: 4,739	I still don't get how I was the only one who got into trouble for Alimony posts? On another Website, a Poster said something like,"I was gambling in a Casino when the guy next to me won a $4,000 Jackpot. He begged me to switch seats with him and he would give me $2,000 to claim the Jackpot as my own. I did and he paid me the $2,000, but now I'm thinking maybe I shouldn't have done that because it was weird that he begged a complete Stranger to claim the Jackpot for $2,000. Why wouldn't he want his entire $4,000?" A Poster replied something like,"He probably didn't want to claim the $4,000 himself because he could have Alimony Payments. I don't even know what Alimony is, but it sounds awful." I (Janice Johnson) responded something like,"Alimony is something you pay an ex spouse after divorce. I've always hated the idea of Alimony, especially if the reason for the divorce in the first place is because the paying spouse was cheated on. Why should someone have to financially support another Adult they are no longer legally bonded to especially if the reason for the divorce was because they got cheated on? Why should they pay someone who cheated on them? Hell no!" Someone else responded,"Alimony is like buying oats for a horse you no longer own " Another Poster said something like," My Friend didn't sign a Prenup and his ex wife cheated on him. He divorced her because of her affair and he has to pay her $2,000 every month." I, Janice Johnson responded,"Alimony sucks! It should be outlawed!" I soon went to another thread and tried to respond but I couldn't. I assumed it was a glitch. I went back to the Jackpot Thread and an Admin wrote something like,"You have hijacked this thread twice by mentioning Alimony twice. It's about a guy trying to hide his Jackpot and asking a complete Stranger to claim it for him for half the Jackpot, not about Alimony. You have received a two week Suspension for Hijacking." I(Janice Johnson) was like,"I wonder who got Suspended for making a Alimony hijack. I know it's not me because I haven't done anything wrong." I then saw in horror that it WAS me who got a two week Suspension for Hijacking with Alimony! And the Admin had chosen to only quote MY responses, making it unfairly look like I just brought up Alimony out of nowhere, didn't even include the posts I responded to. Posters said something like,"Janice Johnson didn't hijack anything. The reason she brought up Alimony twice was because she was responding to two different people who brought it up first. She doesn't deserve a two week Suspension. You've done worse things. If anything, the people who brought up Alimony first should be the ones who get a two week Suspension, not Janice Johnson. You owe Janice Johnson an immediate reinstatement and a full apology for this unfair two week Suspension. " The unfair two week Suspension still stuck despite multiple Posters protesting the two week Suspension. After I came back after the unfair two week Suspension, Posters were like,"Janice Johnson is a lot stronger than I am. I would have personally permanently left after that unfair two week Alimony Suspension." I still don't get how I was the only one who got into trouble for the Alimony thing when I was responding to two different people who brought it up first.

11-25-2023, 01:29 PM	#2
Caroline13 Member Forum Fanatic Join Date: Jan 30, 2021 Location: So Calif Posts: 14,483	Janice Johnson: Another 'woe is me' story drama, hope you will figure it out.
	__________________ Inexpensive Health Insurance = Grape Seed Extract Keep It Simple

11-25-2023, 04:08 PM	#4
Dude111 Forum Legend Join Date: Nov 05, 2013 Posts: 36,348	I hope its ok Janice

11-27-2023, 12:44 AM	#6
Dude111 Forum Legend Join Date: Nov 05, 2013 Posts: 36,348	Wasnt that on CD Carole?? They are horrible and dont deserve a site!!

12-02-2023, 09:06 PM	#10
IllinoisTVFan Member Forum 4000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 22, 2011 Location: South of Chicago Posts: 4,072	For the most part, alimony is a scam and yes should be outlawed. If a spouse cheats they shouldn't get it at all, should only be for those who were stay-at-home spouses and only used until they can get on their feet. Lifetime alimony needs to disappear. What site was this on? Sounds like City-Data, I used to get infractions and eventually banned for the stupidest things.