View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
star trek fan
Eternal Member
![]() Forum Fanatic Join Date: Feb 25, 2002
Location: Conshohocken, pennsylvania
Posts: 14,490
|
for those that have been waiting for a DVD realease of this series; bad news: I just read that it may never come to DVD.
I don't know about "AFTER MASH" though. |
|
__________________
the Clampetts are in a fancy Beverly Hills jewelry store. Granny points to a tray of rubies. Granny: "How much fer one o' them red diamonds?" clerk: "Madam, those are rubies." Granny: "OK ask her kin we buy one offa her." clerk: " The ruby I am talking about is not a lady." Granny: "Lissen, how she got them diamonds is her business. I'm just sayin' ask her kin we buy one from her." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 29, 2006
Location: Long Branch, N.J.
Posts: 2,577
|
...because 20th Century-Fox simply believes there's not an "audience"- or one large enough- to make it worthwhile [and profitable] for them to release all 151 episodes. It doesn't appear on any "national" cable channels as "M*A*S*H" does (at least two different ones these days carry that), so they figure, if the series isn't given any "exposure", who's going to remember it? Better to release their current "in-house" series on DVD- the ones viewers KNOW about, like "GLEE", "BONES", "THE SIMPSONS" and "24"...guaranteed to make a profit for them. Otherwise, why bother spending all that money to digitally remaster an "old show" that very few people are interested in seeing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
star trek fan
Eternal Member
![]() Forum Fanatic Join Date: Feb 25, 2002
Location: Conshohocken, pennsylvania
Posts: 14,490
|
are you talking about "TRAPPER JOHN M.D." or "AFTER MASH"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 29, 2006
Location: Long Branch, N.J.
Posts: 2,577
|
...to "TRAPPER JOHN, M.D.", 'treky'. But that also applies to "AfterMASH" as well, even though that has more of a chance of seeing DVD release than the former (but not much).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
star trek fan
Eternal Member
![]() Forum Fanatic Join Date: Feb 25, 2002
Location: Conshohocken, pennsylvania
Posts: 14,490
|
yea, theres a LOT of "MASH" fans who would like to see both series released.
I'm a "MASH" fan, but just of the first 3 seasons; before it became "THE ALAN ALDA SHOW", and I'd like to see "TRAPPER JOHN M.D." released-I remember it and it was pretty good-I don't give a damn about "AFTER MASH"-I hated that. I read somewhere that Time magazine called it one of the 50 worst spinoffs ever; and they're right!! Another show that a lot of MASH fans-including me-would also like to see come to DVD though is "WALTER"; the pilot for a proposed series about Radar that only aired once. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Shadowville All-Stars
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 31, 2006
Location: Shadowville
Posts: 1,448
|
Quote:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M*A*S*H_Goes_to_Maine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Mar 18, 2022
Posts: 290
|
I never watched more than an episode of Trapper John, M.D., but my impression was that it bore little or no resemblance (literally) to the original character. I remember some people getting excited because the character mentioned Korea in an episode though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Shadowville All-Stars
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 31, 2006
Location: Shadowville
Posts: 1,448
|
True, I found it drab, and not at all like the character played by both Elliott Gould and Wayne Rogers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
22 Years On Sitcoms
Moderator
Forum Legend Join Date: Aug 13, 2003
Location: Indy
Posts: 44,281
|
Yes, you'd hardly see any similarity between Wayne Rogers and Pernell Roberts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Mar 18, 2022
Posts: 290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Shadowville All-Stars
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 31, 2006
Location: Shadowville
Posts: 1,448
|
Quote:
"He trapped me!" The Trapper John of the solo series was more Adam Cartwright in modern times. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Mar 18, 2022
Posts: 290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Shadowville All-Stars
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 31, 2006
Location: Shadowville
Posts: 1,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Mar 18, 2022
Posts: 290
|
I always thought they just wanted to do a medical show, and slapped Trapper's name on there as a ploy to get ratings. They did offer it to Wayne Rogers though, who turned it down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 01, 2008
Location: New jersey
Posts: 1,639
|
Quote:
I had the same impression, to me it was the Medical Center of the 80's. "They did offer it to Wayne Rogers though, who turned it down". That's on the IMD website, I don't buy it. The reason I don't buy is given in the write-up on the very same page, let's take a look at the entire statement: "The producers of Trapper John, M.D. (1979) approached Wayne Rogers to play the title role in their new spin-off. He declined. If he had, the producers of Trapper John would have most certainly had to pay royalties to their parent show MASH. When they were sued by Gene Reynolds and Larry Gelbart and the MASH team, they successfully argued that Trapper John was a spinoff of the MASH movie and the book, not necessarily the tv show. They would have had a hard time making that argument if Wayne Rogers had been hired to play Trapper". No way they would have wanted Rogers for the role, the royalties the producers would have had to pay would have made the project unprofitable for them. Rogers was also the lead in a new series House Calls premiering on CBS just a few months after Trapper John premiered. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|