View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
View Latest Threads in 1960s Sitcoms / 1960s Sitcoms Photo Galleries
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#16 |
|
Concerns, Support, & Feedback
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Dec 26, 2019
Location: The back country
Posts: 5,443
|
It's a shame that the original poster "gutted" this thread, I think that it was worthwhile.
One aspect not mentioned yet is that such shows have a "lovable loser" component. Shows such as Gomer Pyle USMC, and Green Acres depict the simpletons as the ones who are happy, despite their more sophisticated adversaries, who customarily trip themselves up on their own excesses. And I can't think of too many people who would not gladly change places with the Clampetts. Such shows reinforce optimism that even the marginal elements of society can triumph over mainstream villains. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Concerns, Support, & Feedback
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Dec 26, 2019
Location: The back country
Posts: 5,443
|
Quote:
But really, if you take a step back and look at it all in context, who is happier than Newt Kiley on Green Acres? Than Gomer Pyle on the eponymous show, or than Jethro on the Beverly Hillbillies? The straight "mainstream" people are all portrayed as stooges, while the hicks are happy eccentrics. The more I think about this, I believe the concept is a foundation stone to good writing, at least as it pertains to sit-com writing. The movie "Forrest Gump" kind of takes it to an extreme, but people are heartwarmed by the triumphs of the marginal characters MORE SO than they are offended by the stereotypes. I think there is a bit of "I wish it was that easy for me" type self reflection involved. We laugh at ourselves by laughing at our own flaws as seen in the characters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 10, 2012
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 859
|
Our 60's shows do not take themselves to seriously either. They could do comedy without having to make it potty humor. The sitcoms today are way to sensitive/PC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Julie,Julie Anne,&Felice 4Ever
Forum Star
Join Date: Dec 27, 2013
Posts: 16,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Sentimental Fool
Forum Star
Join Date: Aug 22, 2009
Location: Near Notre Dame
Posts: 10,266
|
It's easy to say that rural life was made fun of, but there was a lot of comedy at the expense of urbanites in the same shows. On TBH, how about hypochondriac Mrs. Drysdale, who spends exorbitant amounts of money on her dog Claude and psychiatrists? And Sonny Drysdale, who's spent his entire adult life attending expensive Ivy League schools? By contrast, the rural characters tend to be portrayed for the most part as down-to-earth and well-adjusted. You can't say that about Oliver Douglas, who is constantly frustrated and in some ways inept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Member
Forum 4000 Club Member
Join Date: Jun 22, 2014
Posts: 4,779
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
. I just nailed Mrs. Trumbull
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Julie,Julie Anne,&Felice 4Ever
Forum Star
Join Date: Dec 27, 2013
Posts: 16,914
|
...A sitcom tradition that even leaked into shows in the 1980s. Think of Newhart: Dick and Joanna move to rural Vermont where everyone around them is crazy in one way or another. I guess George and Larry, Darryl, and Darryl are good examples of the "hick" trope being recycled from the 1960s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 30, 2019
Location: los ángeles
Posts: 931
|
IMHO (in their best seasons) The Beverly Hillbillies, Green Acres, Andy Griffith, The Munsters, Gomer Pyle (and even Petticoat Junction early on) were sharp-witted parodies of the status quo and elite.
These are the ultimate in populism. The banker/CEO/society matron is always the caricatured villain. While the "little people'' endure and thrive against them. (In the real world things haven't changed that much... though sadly, the programming POV has). |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|