View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
The Facts of Life Online / The Facts of Life links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / The Facts of Life Photo Gallery / The Facts of Life - Fan Fiction Board / The Division Board
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,097
|
Im asking because I am watching the reunion episode right now and looking at how beautiful Nancy is compared to Blair and wondered if they had decided to keep Nancy instead of the Blair character would the show still have worked?
Nancy was pretty enough to be in the movies |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Dec 24, 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,823
|
Nancy Olson was the least developed character from Season 1. Takes more than beauty to develop a character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Cat-tastic and Whiskerlicious
Forum Celebrity
Join Date: Sep 01, 2006
Location: The Catacombs
Posts: 20,819
|
I agree Nancy was gorgeous in this episode. But there is no way Facts would have been nearly as long lasting if Nancy remained the star instead of Blair, Lisa Whelchel is a much better actress than Felice Schachter. Four seasons tops if Felice had been kept instead of Lisa, and that is being generous. And for much of the show Blair was beautiful, but those awful hairstyles they gave Blair and Jo in the Over Our Heads years didn't help. Sue Ann is the season 1 girl who was most robbed of continuing in the overhaul, Julie Piekarski added so much to that season.
|
|
__________________
Top 200 TV Shows https://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards...14#post6225214 Top 150 Movies https://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards...84#post6175384 Top 1100 Scripted TV Characters https://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards...d.php?t=493306 Top Rookie TV Shows by Calendar Year https://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards...d.php?t=365017 Top Movies by Calendar Year https://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards...d.php?t=473533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Julie,Julie Anne,&Felice 4Ever
Forum Star
Join Date: Dec 27, 2013
Posts: 16,914
|
Felice brought a lot to the role of Nancy in the backdoor pilot. You can tell she understood the role and could bring believably to a character that was hastily created at the end of DS's first season. Compare what she did to what the school girls did in Dorothy and you will understand why Felice was a cut above.
Felice was also gorgeous, and had already done modeling. Unfortunately, the character of Nancy remained largely unused after the pilot. The network saw Blair and Tootie as the cash cows, and the role of Nancy remained largely undeveloped. The focus of the first season centered mostly on clashes between Blair and Sue Ann, who became foils for each other: rich girl from Manhattan vs. farm girl from Kansas City, Kansas. I can't imagine a Facts of Life without Blair. She was, IMO, one of the main reasons the show was so successful. That doesn't mean the show never would have worked without her, but it's just unimaginable to me. Nearly every script featured Blair heavily. The producers and the network knew Lisa as Blair could deliver her snobby lines and get big laughs, and they relied on that fact for nine seasons. Unfortunately, the number of lines on a 22-minute sitcom are a zero-sum game, and there was so much focus on Blair and Tootie that first season that the other girls (except Sue Ann) often became background characters. The role of Nancy became walking wallpaper, and by the end of the season, the role of Cindy did, as well. In the final two episodes of the season, Nancy and Cindy barely exist, and the character of Nancy is sent out to pasture, er, the garden. It's clear the writers were telegraphing their intentions to reduce the cast, starting by removing Nancy and Cindy from the equation. I agree with Catsrule that Sue Ann was absolutely a major element of Season 1: Julie Pie as Sue Ann was given a chance to shine in a way that Felice as Nancy was not. But with the determination that the focus would shift to a gangster girl from The Bronx, the frenemy relationship between Blair and Sue Ann was (IMO stupidly) axed, and half the cast was purged between seasons, in favor of Jo Fonzarelli. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Dec 24, 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,823
|
They could have had clashes between Jo an Sue Ann like in the Little Chill. Have it the urban street girl vs. the farm girl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 29, 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,473
|
Honestly, I can't imagine the show without Blair
. Nancy had a great potential but the writers, except for I.Q. and the brief scenes with Roger, never used her after the pilot. I would have liked to see Blair, Natalie, Tootie and Cindy/Sue Ann |
|
__________________
The Facts Of Life Italian Fan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: 99,097
|
Quote:
Or Blair/Nancy/Natalie and Tootie since Blair and Nancy was on the same level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Jun 25, 2001
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 3,419
|
Axing Sue Ann was a smart move. She was the worst actress in season 1 - her line readings were like something out of a high school play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Dec 24, 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Dec 06, 2007
Posts: 7,034
|
Yeah Nancy was prob the last girl they should consider. Sue Ann prob should’ve stayed over Nat.
|
|
__________________
Some of my favorite theme songs: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-e...89CsiJpV_irnNw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
She died the way she lived
Forum 4000 Club Member
Join Date: May 08, 2002
Posts: 4,640
|
Looks aren't everything. Looks fade, talent not so much. I think Lisa was a better actress, and I wouldn't say that one wasn't prettier than the other. There was more to the Blair character than the Nancy character. I will go as far as to say that the show wouldn't have worked without Blair. She was beloved more than Nancy. Nancy was axed at the right time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 07, 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 742
|
Still don't like how Jo acted like she'd never met the Lost Girls (ready to step forward when Blair said they had someone to introduce to the girls). Jo interacted with them in at least a couple of episodes. And then Nancy said something about how that's the rough-and-tough Jo they've heard so much about.
At least Tootie said "You remember Jo." And then Jo still said "Nice to meet you" when everyone was engrossed in conversation and she was going to leave. Also- the rerun on Antenna oddly edits out the line about Molly. Anyhow, in the end, the foursome that was from season 2-on really was the best combination. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Dec 24, 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,823
|
Felice was good in Zapped!. However she wanted to go to university full time on the East Coast (and an Ivy League college at that) and wanted a break from acting. It sounded like they offered her to comeback part time in Season 4 like Seasons 2 and 3, but she declined. Felice has done well in her psychology career that both her and her character were pursuing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Julie,Julie Anne,&Felice 4Ever
Forum Star
Join Date: Dec 27, 2013
Posts: 16,914
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 29, 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,473
|
I'm sure the writers wanted to keep Cindy or Sue Ann for the 4th girl role. Sue Ann was one of the most developed characters from season 1 and Cindy was the prototype Jo.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|