View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
Unsolved Mysteries Online Main Page / Message Board / Show History / Episode Guide (1987-2002) / Expanded Episode Guide #2 / Expanded Episode Guide #3 / Case Updates / Wiki / Official Site / Related Links
True Crime Shows Message Board / View Latest Threads in True Crime Shows / America's Most Wanted (AMW) / American Justice / City Confidential / Cold Case Files / Dateline / Disappeared / Forensic Files / 48 Hours / The Hunt with John Walsh / In Pursuit with John Walsh / Missing: Reward / On the Case with Paula Zahn / All Other Cases
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Jan 23, 2017
Posts: 35
|
https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/...C328aeOOQpZiM/
Dennis Perry was innocent after all. Damn!!!! I always thought that the evidence against him was flimsy. They got the DNA match from the suspect's mother. I live in Georgia and this just broke today. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
#VLSKMS
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,611
|
I really hope this case is actually solved this time, but I do remember reading through one of Dennis Perry's appeals a few years ago, and it mentioned an ex-girlfriend of his saying that Perry had a buddy of his who had a relative who wore distinct safety glasses and that the glasses left behind at the murder scene looked identical to those. Apparently someone stole the glasses (or were misplaced and never found), but the implication was that Perry could have stolen them and still been the one wearing them even though the hairs did not match him. If Perry can be connected to this guy with a DNA match somehow, I don't think it 100% exonerates him just yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Nov 27, 2018
Location: VT
Posts: 157
|
An interesting development, especially since Unsolved Mysteries LOST the original glasses.
|
|
__________________
"Your lights are a laugh!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: May 04, 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 176
|
I believe it absolutely 100 percent exonerates him because the DNA matches another suspect that police looked at early on and bungled the investigation. There is no way in 1985 Dennis Perry thought to plant glasses at the scene to implicate another person with mitochondrial DNA from a hair. By all accounts Dennis Perry did not wear glasses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 28, 2018
Posts: 901
|
Eyewitness testimony fails again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 16, 2010
Location: Belfast, Va
Posts: 982
|
Someone refresh my memory which case was this and when was it on? Can't even remember it right off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
#VLSKMS
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,611
|
Quote:
Black pastor and his wife are murdered by a scruffy looking white man who left behind a pair of glasses at the scene. IIRC, UM lost the glasses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Jun 19, 2008
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 5,156
|
Yep. And it was a big deal back in Georgia. Bill Smith, the sheriff of Camden Co who is interviewed in the segment, made a unilateral decision to mail off the glasses when they were requested by UM, and apparently didn't follow a proper chain of custody. Joe Gregory, the GBI agent assigned to the case and also interviewed in the segment, was pretty pee-oh'd about it:
https://www.denverpost.com/2007/07/2...hurch-murders/ |
|
__________________
"Why is she lying?, it makes me wonder. What is she hiding?, it makes me wonder." Go Vols! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 17, 2017
Posts: 847
|
Quote:
Running around town showing pictures to witnesses, tainting everything. Yikes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Jun 19, 2008
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 5,156
|
Quote:
I don't blame either Cora Fisher or Vanzola Williams for incorrectly identifying Perry. They were unfairly primed to do just that. And it's not the first time at least Williams was, I think, pressured into identifying a suspect. After all, she herself ultimately concedes on the UM segment she wasn't "really sure" about picking Donnie Barrentine out of a lineup. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
#VLSKMS
Forum Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,611
|
It's bizarre to me to think that a case had 2 semi-promising suspects, both with shaky alibis, both with witnesses who say they confessed to the crime, and BOTH of them being identified by the witnesses in the church...to have nothing to do with the crime. I can't think of another case like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 16, 2010
Location: Belfast, Va
Posts: 982
|
Quote:
Glad it was resolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Forum Veteran
Join Date: Jun 19, 2008
Location: The Volunteer State
Posts: 5,156
|
Quote:
I became pretty confident it wasn't Perry and a little less certain it wasn't Donnie Barrentine, either. But I never expected something like this to unfold. Like Cars said, I can't think of another case in which two different suspects carrying just enough suspicion about them were both identified by witnesses as the perpetrator, and the testable physical evidence doesn't identify either of them as such. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
1) How do I contact Unsolved Mysteries with information
on segments?
If you any information on cases, you can contact them via:
Website: www.unsolved.com
Contact form on official Unsolved Mysteries site
Please note that their old mailing address and 1-800 phone number no longer work.
2) Where can I watch Unsolved Mysteries? Unsolved Mysteries is available for streaming on Amazon Video and YouTube.