View Today's Active Threads (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / View New Posts (No Chit Chat/Chit Chat Only) / Mark All Boards Read / Chit Chat Board
The Facts of Life Online / The Facts of Life links and theme songs at Sitcoms Online / The Facts of Life Photo Gallery / The Facts of Life - Fan Fiction Board / The Division Board
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Nov 07, 2000
Location: philly, pa
Posts: 20
|
I heard that originally the first season girl(nancy,sueann,cindy) were asked to come back for the whole 86-87 season from when mrs.garret got married, instead of just the one episode. The script needed work so they put it on hold and were only offering the girls 9,000 an episode which would of been a slap in the face considering the other actresses they started with in 1979 were renegotiating and making 6 times as much an episode. The girls ended up saying no but agreed to the one episode(little chill)instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Site Owner
Administrator
Forum Star Join Date: Feb 03, 2000
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 10,682
|
I've never head this - where did you hear it from? $9,000 an episode is still a considerable amount of money - especially for them since most of them had not acted very much since the first season ended..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Occasional Poster
Join Date: Sep 08, 2000
Location: pgh, pa
Posts: 37
|
Well Felice Schachter had a major role in the 1982 film zapped opposite Scott Baio who was pretty popular at the time. That's the reason she didn't appear anymore on the show after early 1982! They still wanted to use her but weren't going to give her more than a few cameos a season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 04, 2000
Location: New York, New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 10,857
|
Oh, man if this were true about the first season girls coming back, I would have loved the show even more. I'm just a first season fan. That would have been great to bring them back. They should return for the movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Something about the reunion episone puzzles me. Nancy, Cindy, and Sue Ann acted like they never met Jo before, when they were all in the second season as guestas a lot. Also, in second season, Jo seemed perfectly comfortable with them, unlike in that late episode.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jan 30, 2001
Posts: 338
|
yeah
|
|
Last edited by Jo Polniaczec; 08-01-2011 at 12:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jan 30, 2001
Posts: 338
|
nah
|
|
Last edited by Jo Polniaczec; 08-01-2011 at 12:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Moderator
Forum Fanatic Join Date: Apr 04, 2000
Location: New York, New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 10,857
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Dec 24, 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,811
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Aug 13, 2017
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 3,368
|
Quote:
If this is true, i'm sure they didn't want to be committed and tied down F/T to a show that was paying them so low each week when there were possible movie roles they could snag or other sitcom pilots they could audition for. Speaking of salary. I remember reading somewhere a long time ago, one of the cast members saying they did the 2001 movie reunion (that sucked imo) because they get no residuals from the old show and this was their way of making some money off the show. Is that true---they get nothing from FOL when it plays in reruns or from dvd sales?! That's so messed up if true!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Forum 3000 Club Member
Join Date: Dec 24, 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,811
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|