NH Forgotten family - Page 2 - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

ctgrumpybear · 05-11-2012, 09:00 PM

DNA say The adult victim is NOT the biological mother of any of the three child victims but are related
The middle child is NOT biologically related to the other three victims

so the older jane doe was a aunt,sister or cousin of the two of the little girls

welshman · 05-12-2012, 01:16 PM

Potentially the age gap between the youngest and oldest is only 20 years so the three could be siblings with a fostered child or adopted one killed as well.

ctgrumpybear · 07-19-2012, 08:36 AM

here a facebook group about this case
http://www.facebook.com/#!/identify.victims

ctgrumpybear · 02-14-2013, 09:43 PM

The NH State police will be taking this case to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children where they are putting thougher a team of the best national experts to review this case. they will be doing new dna test and build new profiles of the does in this case

TracyLynnS · 06-14-2013, 05:54 PM

This article contains photos of composites that are slightly different than what's currently on the DOJ website I posted on the first page:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...years-ago.html

TracyLynnS · 06-15-2013, 01:13 PM

In the article above, they are now saying that the woman is either the aunt or mother of the 3 children and they do believe all four are related.

If the reconstructions are any indication, it seems obvious they are all related and look like mother and children. The woman has very distinctive teeth and the children's teeth all seem to be similar, considering their varying ages.

One thing I thought was interesting, the police think they died between 1977 and 1985. The oldest girl has double piercings in her ears, which was reported as "odd considering her age" (5-10 years old).

IMO, this is a good indication of when they were killed. Double ear piercings became very popular in the early 1980s and by 1984, I had 3 in each ear.

Does anyone remember if multiple piercings were popular before then? I was 10 years old in 1977 and had single piercings then. I didn't know anyone with more than one piercing at that time. That's one reason I think this family was killed probably between 1981 and 1985.

ctgrumpybear · 06-18-2013, 12:33 PM

if some best info on this case go to
http://oakhillresearch.blogspot.com

ctgrumpybear · 11-29-2015, 12:36 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=to5M6ijXIV0

ctgrumpybear · 01-25-2017, 04:37 PM

http://www.wmur.com/article/authorit...d-case/8637909

ctgrumpybear · 01-26-2017, 12:07 PM

and now this case get more mess up

http://www.wmur.com/article/authorit...-cases/8641638

05-11-2012, 09:00 PM	#16
ctgrumpybear Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jan 09, 2010 Posts: 117	DNA DNA say The adult victim is NOT the biological mother of any of the three child victims but are related The middle child is NOT biologically related to the other three victims so the older jane doe was a aunt,sister or cousin of the two of the little girls

02-14-2013, 09:43 PM	#19
ctgrumpybear Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jan 09, 2010 Posts: 117	Some major updates on this case The NH State police will be taking this case to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children where they are putting thougher a team of the best national experts to review this case. they will be doing new dna test and build new profiles of the does in this case

11-29-2015, 12:36 PM	#23
ctgrumpybear Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jan 09, 2010 Posts: 117	updates https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=to5M6ijXIV0

05-12-2012, 01:16 PM	#17
welshman Member Occasional Poster Join Date: Jun 13, 2011 Location: wales Posts: 78	Potentially the age gap between the youngest and oldest is only 20 years so the three could be siblings with a fostered child or adopted one killed as well.

07-19-2012, 08:36 AM	#18
ctgrumpybear Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jan 09, 2010 Posts: 117	here a facebook group about this case http://www.facebook.com/#!/identify.victims

06-14-2013, 05:54 PM	#20
TracyLynnS Don't Look Up Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 07, 2009 Posts: 3,107	This article contains photos of composites that are slightly different than what's currently on the DOJ website I posted on the first page: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...years-ago.html

06-15-2013, 01:13 PM	#21
TracyLynnS Don't Look Up Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 07, 2009 Posts: 3,107	In the article above, they are now saying that the woman is either the aunt or mother of the 3 children and they do believe all four are related. If the reconstructions are any indication, it seems obvious they are all related and look like mother and children. The woman has very distinctive teeth and the children's teeth all seem to be similar, considering their varying ages. One thing I thought was interesting, the police think they died between 1977 and 1985. The oldest girl has double piercings in her ears, which was reported as "odd considering her age" (5-10 years old). IMO, this is a good indication of when they were killed. Double ear piercings became very popular in the early 1980s and by 1984, I had 3 in each ear. Does anyone remember if multiple piercings were popular before then? I was 10 years old in 1977 and had single piercings then. I didn't know anyone with more than one piercing at that time. That's one reason I think this family was killed probably between 1981 and 1985.

06-18-2013, 12:33 PM	#22
ctgrumpybear Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jan 09, 2010 Posts: 117	if some best info on this case go to http://oakhillresearch.blogspot.com

01-25-2017, 04:37 PM	#24
ctgrumpybear Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jan 09, 2010 Posts: 117	http://www.wmur.com/article/authorit...d-case/8637909

01-26-2017, 12:07 PM	#25
ctgrumpybear Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jan 09, 2010 Posts: 117	and now this case get more mess up http://www.wmur.com/article/authorit...-cases/8641638