Can anyone identify this episode of Forensic Files - Sitcoms Online Message Boards

zack007attack · 05-23-2009, 07:20 PM

It was about a man and a woman who married because I think it was their church father that said god wanted them to marry so they did. Then later the man supposedly killed the woman for life insurance money. Does this episode sound familiar to anyone?

everybodylovesrs · 05-30-2009, 01:51 PM

LOL, about every Forensic Files episode is about collecting for the insurance money Hard to say. lol

Kane · 08-13-2009, 08:22 AM

If anything, FF had an episode titled "Unholy Alliance," which focused on a Colorado couple involved with a religous cult. In this case, the husband, Matthew Mirabal, killed his wife Natalie in September 1999. Although greed was a motivating factor in the murder, Matthew was also having an affair with his sister-in-law (his brother's wife).

Maybe this is the case you're thinking about, but I could be wrong.

05-23-2009, 07:20 PM	#1
zack007attack Member Frequent Poster Join Date: Jan 30, 2009 Posts: 402	Can anyone identify this episode of Forensic Files It was about a man and a woman who married because I think it was their church father that said god wanted them to marry so they did. Then later the man supposedly killed the woman for life insurance money. Does this episode sound familiar to anyone?

05-30-2009, 01:51 PM	#2
everybodylovesrs Member Forum Regular Join Date: Dec 12, 2008 Posts: 526	LOL, about every Forensic Files episode is about collecting for the insurance money Hard to say. lol

08-13-2009, 08:22 AM	#3
Kane Member Forum 3000 Club Member Join Date: Mar 07, 2001 Location: MA, United States Posts: 3,367	If anything, FF had an episode titled "Unholy Alliance," which focused on a Colorado couple involved with a religous cult. In this case, the husband, Matthew Mirabal, killed his wife Natalie in September 1999. Although greed was a motivating factor in the murder, Matthew was also having an affair with his sister-in-law (his brother's wife). Maybe this is the case you're thinking about, but I could be wrong.