I liked Sue-Ann.. BUT I think they should of kept Molly Ringwald...What do u think??

------------------
Ms G: Natalie why dont you show Jo a better place to park her bike
Jo: why dont I park it on Blairs face?
Natalie: shes a breath of fresh air isnt she??

Out of the 1st season girls I liked: Molly, Natalie, and Nancy.

------------------
Andrew Carden

SUE ANN she was the most complexed and wouldve had much better story lines than Nancy, Molly and Cindy

Probably Sue Ann. That was my fav and I think they done good by getting rid of the ones they did. Jo was my fav character of all time and still is!!
It was a good idea to concentrate on Blair, Tootie, Natlie, and to bring in Jo.

But, if Nancy stayed on the show, we could have seen Roger, and how she got pregnant with him at Eastland! I bet that Roger would end up being some really short, fat guy.

------------------
Andrew Carden

LOL yeah that would have been interesting!!

------------------
Ms G: Natalie why dont you show Jo a better place to park her bike
Jo: why dont I park it on Blairs face?
Natalie: shes a breath of fresh air isnt she??

I loved Tootie in the first season, and I thought it was funny how Blair was so stuck up and sort of a ditz.

I think they should have kept Nancy, her character really did improve as the seasons went on, although she was rarely there. No one ever got to see her talent, though, because she was always on the phone with Roger.

Cindy was interesting, but that would've
made 2 tomboys once Jo arrived, which
I guess wouldn't have worked. Jo was always
my favorite.

Does growing up have to mean wussing out http://www.sitcomsonline.com/ubb/wink.gif?

By the way, Sue Ann certainly was the
whipping post of the first season girls--
starving herself because she thought and
was told she was fat (puhlease), the lowest
IQ score, losing her "jock" status to
newcomer Cindy...am I missing anything? http://www.sitcomsonline.com/ubb/smile.gif

Molly!!!! She was awesome I can't believe that she was dropped. But Jo makes the whole show come together and it wouldn't of been the same if they kept Molly.

Probably Sue Ann but I don't know

Ilike Sue Ann.

I say Roger and Steve. They were my favorite first season gals. http://www.sitcomsonline.com/ubb/wink.gif


------------------
"It was just like Saturday Night Fever, only it was a Friday."

None of them. I think that Jo, Blair, Natalie and Tootie were the perfect set of 4 to focus on.

They should of just kept the fired first season girls as recurring characters and they could of been used about as much as cousin geri! After all they were still students at eastland and it would of been cool if they did a little chill like episode before they all graduated eastland with them having a slumber party in the room above the kitchen where they all treat jo like the outsider and mrs.garret would be nearby, with all the girls including jo forming strong bonds before they graduate! That would of been better than trying to pretend the other girls never met jo in 86, even though the actors new better! I also would of liked to see nancy get her own spotlight episode where we finally get to see roger(where scott baio could make a special guest appearance)

Probably Molly (even though she wasn't my fav) She hit it big in '84,'85 with 'The movies; 'The Breakfast Club', 'Pretty in Pink' and 'Sixteen Candles'. It would've been awesome if she was still on FOL.

Molly, i guess. Nancy was terrible in the 1st season but she was better when she did appear in the 2nd season eps. So i would have to say molly and nancy.

------------------
Blair:Tell it to the frog.Go on, tell it to his face.You can't, can you.You know why?Because he doesn't have a face Tootie!

Just bumping this up. And I guess I liked Nancy the best, so if anyone, they should have kept her.