I would have to say Good Times over the Jeffersons because the Good Times episodes including more interesting topics. Such as unemploymemnt, gangs, and the family receiving eviction notices every once in a while. On the other hand the Jeffersons had the potential to be one of the greatest sitcoms ever after the first season but there was too many changes before season 2. So basically that's one good season versus 3 good seasons which means Good Times WINS!!!

The Jeffersons had a lot of changes, but it stayed funny. Good Times wasn't funny because they played off J.J. too much, and he got really old after awhile.

Originally posted by jimmiegirl48
The Jeffersons had a lot of changes, but it stayed funny. Good Times wasn't funny because they played off J.J. too much, and he got really old after awhile.

The Jeffersons stayed funny but the characters Louise and George Jeffersons were not the same as they were on All in the Family. George and Louise were like two different people 4th or 5th season of the Jeffersons. Especially George. On the other hand, Florida and James were the same on Good Times as they were on Maude. They never changed.

Originally posted by SOLOMON

The Jeffersons stayed funny but the characters Louise and George Jeffersons were not the same as they were on All in the Family. George and Louise were like two different people 4th or 5th season of the Jeffersons. Especially George. On the other hand, Florida and James were the same on Good Times as they were on Maude. They never changed.

My pick: The Jeffersons
My reasons: (1) Less preachy; (2) I like Isabel Sanford much more than Esther Rolle; and (3) NO Jimmie Walker!! (Sorry, but I cannot stand him.)

By the way, Solomon, the character of James Evans didn't appear on Maude.

I like the Jeffersons better.

1. Better cast of characters.

2. Funnier stories. They dealt with controversial subjects in a less serious and preachy way than Good Times did.

3. An absence of a character who took over the show (which was the case with J.J.). I don't feel George totally eclipsed the show like J.J. did on Good Times.

4. The Jeffersons is also better because I don't see any major changes during the first seven or eight years. The show evolved and with this came the toning down of George and one cast change (Mike Evans/Damon Evans) but that didn't really effect the show since it was obvious that Lionel wasn't the main character.

However, Good Times had major cast changes, with John Amos leaving and Esther Rolle leaving and coming back. Not to mention the introduction of characters that weren't really necessary like Bookman, Keith, Carl and Penny.

Originally posted by TVgen62


My pick: The Jeffersons
My reasons: (1) Less preachy; (2) I like Isabel Sanford much more than Esther Rolle; and (3) NO Jimmie Walker!! (Sorry, but I cannot stand him.)

By the way, Solomon, the character of James Evans didn't appear on Maude.

He appeared as Henry-the character was still the same as James Evans

I don't really liked either but if I HAD to choose then it would be "The Jeffersons".

The Jeffersons because it was much funnier. Good Times is too preachy! It gets on my nerves.:rolleyes:

The Jeffersons is my selection. The show was just plain out funnier and endured longer than Good Times. The cast of Good Times weren't near as good as cast of The Jeffersons and the chemistry between the characters was definitely better on The Jeffersons.

Originally posted by LucyFan
The Jeffersons is my selection. The show was just plain out funnier and endured longer than Good Times. The cast of Good Times weren't near as good as cast of The Jeffersons and the chemistry between the characters was definitely better on The Jeffersons.

IMO, Florida Evans was MUCH funnier than Louise Jefferson.

Originally posted by SOLOMON

The Jeffersons stayed funny but the characters Louise and George Jeffersons were not the same as they were on All in the Family. George and Louise were like two different people 4th or 5th season of the Jeffersons. Especially George. On the other hand, Florida and James were the same on Good Times as they were on Maude. They never changed.Yea thats true isnt it?

I dunno why they didnt play the exact same characters they did on thier show which made it so good!

I havent seen enough of Good times to make a determination...

Jeffersons was good thruout its time though..

Good Times and The Jefferson ..tied.Both shows were superb and real..feel good tv..vibes....makes one 4get .......bad times...The chemistry of both cast on both shows show love,warmth and closeness or darn good acting.Florida and James neighbor was superb !! Graet actress/character.

The Jeffersons I guess. 100% less JJ.

Unless you love JJ. In which case forget I said that.

On the other hand, Florida and James were the same on Good Times as they were on Maude. They never changed.Then why are you so insistent Good Times is not a spin-off of Maude? :grr:

The Jeffersons I guess. 100% less JJ.

Unless you love JJ. In which case forget I said that.

Esther Rolle said in a interview the JJ character was more suited for Jeffersons or Sanford and Son:lol: I think he would have been a better Lamont because he looked more like a dummy

Then why are you so insistent Good Times is not a spin-off of Maude? :grr:

Name change and location and financial situation

The Jeffersons. I never got the appeal of Esther Rolle, stretching back to Maude.

Esther Rolle said in a interview the JJ character was more suited for Jeffersons or Sanford and Son:lol: I think he would have been a better Lamont because he looked more like a dummy

JJ Sanford insulted by Fred? Yeah, I could see that.

The Jeffersons. I never got the appeal of Esther Rolle, stretching back to Maude.

You don’t like Esther? Damn damn damn.

JJ Sanford insulted by Fred? Yeah, I could see that.

Lamont didnt come off as a dummy so thats why the joke made no sense

Lamont didnt come off as a dummy so thats why the joke made no sense

I’m just bringing the JJ character over to Sanford to be Fred’s son, not to be Lamont. He can be Lamont’s brother if you want.