(Laverne and Shirley)
!.Moving to California-Because it made it hard to do ccrossover episodes with Happy Days.

Shirley Leaving-Because those two characters were a team from day one and just having Laverne was pointless.


(Jeffersons)
First Lionel Leaving-Because he was the Original Lionel Jefferson from 71-75 and to bring another person in was ridiculous.


(Good Times)
Getting rid of the Dad-because he was clearly the Star of the Show. James carried the show for 2 years.

Not leaving the Cast the way it was-Because i think the show would have done just fine with the original characters. Adding new characters was a No-no.

Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer


(Good Times)
Getting rid of the Dad-because he was clearly the Star of the Show. James carried the show for 2 years.




I thought you said that Good Times was not a spin-off...

Originally posted by GeeBee
I thought you said that Good Times was not a spin-off...

:lol:

Originally posted by GeeBee
I thought you said that Good Times was not a spin-off...


I posted that back in february, that was before I knew Good Times wasn't a spinoff. I found it wasn't a spinoff in late March.

Originally posted by *~PinkLady59~*
:lol:


What's funny? It's a OLD post. I didn't have the article back in february, i didn't get it until March.

Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer
What's funny? It's a OLD post. I didn't have the article back in february, i didn't get it until March.

Excuse me, I didn't notice that it was old. Chill out. :rolleyes:

Originally posted by *~PinkLady59~*
Excuse me, I didn't notice that it was old. Chill out. :rolleyes:


I wasn't getting bent out of shape, i just saying it was a old post-LoL-THat's all.

Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer
I posted that back in february, that was before I knew Good Times wasn't a spinoff. I found it wasn't a spinoff in late March.


Then why didn't you edit it?

Originally posted by GeeBee
Then why didn't you edit it?

He doesn't know how, just like he doesn't know how to post a new reply without quoting someone first.

Originally posted by GeeBee
Then why didn't you edit it?


You were the one who replied to this old post.

Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer
You were the one who replied to this old post.


Yes, because it was still there to be replied to. That's the whole concept of posts on a message board. Since you've put the issue of whether Good Times is a spin-off or not in the same category of importance with the existence of God, I would think that you'd want to correct all posts written before you were so enlightened.

Originally posted by GeeBee
Yes, because it was still there to be replied to. That's the whole concept of posts on a message board. Since you've put the issue of whether Good Times is a spin-off or not in the same category of importance with the existence of God, I would think that you'd want to correct all posts written before you were so enlightened.
:lol: Well . . . it's obvious that he still needs more enlightenment because he's still getting into arguments with VARIOUS of Sitcom Online members.

Originally posted by LucyFan
:lol: Well . . . it's obvious that he still needs more enlightenment because he's still getting into arguments with VARIOUS of Sitcom Online members.

I said all i had to say and the discussion about Good Times is over

Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer
I said all i had to say and the discussion about Good Times is over
Yeah . . . until you decide to start up another one about it again.
:rolleyes:

Originally posted by LucyFan
Yeah . . . until you decide to start up another one about it again.
:rolleyes:

No, there won't be any more comments about Good Times being a spinoff

Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer
No, there won't be any more comments about Good Times being a spinoff
Wow, Solomon, I like how the way you changed the words around this time. First it wasn't a spin-off and now it is a spin-off. Can't you just make up your mind?

Originally posted by LucyFan
Wow, Solomon, I like how the way you changed the words around this time. First it wasn't a spin-off and now it is a spin-off. Can't you just make up your mind?

Oh I still feel Good Times is not a spinoff, I just don't plan on debating about it anymore because no one wanted a copy of the article that supported my argument.

Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer
Oh I still feel Good Times is not a spinoff, I just don't plan on debating about it anymore because no one wanted a copy of the article that supported my argument.
Geez . . . I wonder why? Could it be that the article had to many errors in it and not enough proven facts? Well, yes . . . because clearly no one is buying it except you (and maybe a few others).

Originally posted by LucyFan
Geez . . . I wonder why? Could it be that the article had to many errors in it and not enough proven facts? Well, yes . . . because clearly no one is buying it except you (and maybe a few others).


I have something supporting my argument, WHAT DO YOU HAVE?-LOL

Originally posted by Sitcom Analyzer
I have something supporting my argument, WHAT DO YOU HAVE?-LOL
What's so funny? Get real . . . geez. Anyways, I have a lot of supporting facts too but most of all, a clear definition that is simple.