Yong Fang
05-15-2019, 02:59 AM
I think the show is rather hit and miss. It is not like the old Rod Serling show to me. This show is much more dark and spooky. It has sort of gotten my interest but I find some flaws with it.
1. The episodes are too long, and an hour show is too long in this format. The early 1960's show could set up the plot rather quickly and then resolve what happens in the end. Because that was sort of what made the show great, the endings.
2. It is dark and spooky. Some of Serling's shows were dark and really spooky but there were some that were not, and even heartwarming to a point. I have never seen Serling's later show Night Gallery but perhaps this new reboot is more like Night Gallery that the Twilight Zone.
3. The swearing. Now, I am not against swearing in movies and in some TV shows. Concerning TV, some shows must have swearing. The Sopranos is a good example. Sociopathic criminal folk swear a lot, and in this context, the so called "f-word" and "s-word" among others.
But here to me it doesn't work because it takes away the spirit of the old show. I don't think Serling would have employed this in the early 1960's even if there was no issue with him doing it. That is the weird thing here. Also, another "CBS Access" series, Star Trek Discovery slips in an "s-word" or an "f-word" at least once an episode. Again, the other shows and the Trek films didn't employ that, even soft swearing like "damn" "hell" etc.
I will say that Jordan Peele is a pretty good nararator, but again tends to be spooky in his approach. Again the Twilight Zone, the literal zone itself is not always spooky, scary and forboding.
Who else likes or dislikes the show?
1. The episodes are too long, and an hour show is too long in this format. The early 1960's show could set up the plot rather quickly and then resolve what happens in the end. Because that was sort of what made the show great, the endings.
2. It is dark and spooky. Some of Serling's shows were dark and really spooky but there were some that were not, and even heartwarming to a point. I have never seen Serling's later show Night Gallery but perhaps this new reboot is more like Night Gallery that the Twilight Zone.
3. The swearing. Now, I am not against swearing in movies and in some TV shows. Concerning TV, some shows must have swearing. The Sopranos is a good example. Sociopathic criminal folk swear a lot, and in this context, the so called "f-word" and "s-word" among others.
But here to me it doesn't work because it takes away the spirit of the old show. I don't think Serling would have employed this in the early 1960's even if there was no issue with him doing it. That is the weird thing here. Also, another "CBS Access" series, Star Trek Discovery slips in an "s-word" or an "f-word" at least once an episode. Again, the other shows and the Trek films didn't employ that, even soft swearing like "damn" "hell" etc.
I will say that Jordan Peele is a pretty good nararator, but again tends to be spooky in his approach. Again the Twilight Zone, the literal zone itself is not always spooky, scary and forboding.
Who else likes or dislikes the show?