JQXsoZn9_RE&t=#t=10m19s

How come they had a fallen out? As a matter of fact, according to Ed O'Neill, his relationship with Amanda Bearse started becoming estranged after about the third year. It got so bad that Amanda didn't invite either Ed, David Faustino, or Ronald Leavitt to her wedding.

One theory that I've read is that Ed O'Neill and David Faustino were deep down inside, playing themselves most of the time. And the jokes they would tell on the show to the Marcy character were real jokes to them. And that is why the jokes came out so real and so funny. And perhaps that is why Amanda would not invite them to her wedding, because Ed and David actually made fun of her during the shooting of the show.

So Ed really did think she looked like a chicken who'd a thunk it.

ZkjNyoPRBsc

He probably didn't like how Al was portrayed during the years she directed.

From that interview both parties come off as petty and childish but Amanda came off as arrogant when it came to talking about her directing which almost ruined the show.

I had heard that they didn't get along, but I had no idea it was that bad.

Number one reason why you don't let actors direct or write episodes of their shows and Ed is right if he would've left the show would go under because without Al all you have is a typical 90's adult sitcom.

I did not know that they dont like too much in private life. at least in one point of life. :confused:

This story sounds like how the feud between Vivian Vance and William Frawley started. As I understand it Vivian said something about Frawley's age and got insulted. In this case it's sounds as if O Neill said something that Bearse overheard that angered her. Amanda had every right to invite the people she wanted at her wedding. Bearse felt that David Ed and Ron did something to her. However Ed O neill seems to have understood that perhaps he overstepped his bounds from an interview. I do not know about David or Ron how they feel today. However If Ed is serious about some peace between him and Amanda then I would be disappointed if Amanda did not meet him half way

He probably didn't like how Al was portrayed during the years she directed.

According to Amanda, Ed was not happy when she started directing episodes and having more of a say in the show. He also apparently couldn't resist chiding her about feminist stuff (and possibly lesbian stuff) and I doubt she's the type to laugh it off.

I bet the NO' MAM years would've been allot different had she not been directing and not had any input.

-S3_vTdNScA

I still love watching re-runs of this show. I might actually enjoy the show more now than I did when it was in first runs, because I have grown more cynical with age.

The episodes after about 1992 don't seem as funny, perhaps this coincided with Amanda "evolving"as O'neill describes it in the longer video.

From that interview both parties come off as petty and childish but Amanda came off as arrogant when it came to talking about her directing which almost ruined the show.

Marcy's whole character was presumably meant to be a parody of the shrill, hypocritical women who claim to be feminists but really just want power over men and also hate other women. It seemed in the case with Amanda, she was actually closer to that depiction in real life (in other words, she didn't really have to "do too much" acting) than you would imagine.

I see fault on both sides, but maybe Ed didn't have to throw his power on the show in Amanda's face.

I still love watching re-runs of this show. I might actually enjoy the show more now than I did when it was in first runs, because I have grown more cynical with age.

The episodes after about 1992 don't seem as funny, perhaps this coincided with Amanda "evolving"as O'neill describes it in the longer video.

It seems like there were multiple factors, here: they had two very different political points of view, but also Amanda was getting involved in directing the show, where she would be telling Ed how to act. Ed, as the star of the show, could have gotten Amanda fired, as he says in the video, but didn't. Amanda must have felt insulted or even threatened by this assertion. What it boils down to is control.

I agree the later episodes aren't as funny.

Like I said before both sides are at fault and the show suffered as a result Amanda could've left the Al Bundy character alone and had episodes where Marcy actually sides with Al an NO'MAM and Ed could've apologized for the insults and tried to work with her and both could have kept their politics to themselves.

I did not know that they dont like too much in private life. at least in one point of life. :confused:

I am shocked too.

Like I said before both sides are at fault and the show suffered as a result Amanda could've left the Al Bundy character alone and had episodes where Marcy actually sides with Al an NO'MAM and Ed could've apologized for the insults and tried to work with her and both could have kept their politics to themselves.

I never watched the show but in general in Hollywood, only Republicans have to keep their politics to themselves. If you're not a flaming American-hater-whites-are-racist-gays-are-superior liberal, your next uttered sentence in Hollywood may be your last. Hollywood only celebrates "diversity" if you agree with them politically. And even though may have had different views on gays, Ed O'Neill is a democrat who campaigned for Obama.

And the Bundy's was portrayed as typical Democrats so go figure.

I never watched the show but in general in Hollywood, only Republicans have to keep their politics to themselves. If you're not a flaming American-hater-whites-are-racist-gays-are-superior liberal, your next uttered sentence in Hollywood may be your last. Hollywood only celebrates "diversity" if you agree with them politically. And even though may have had different views on gays, Ed O'Neill is a democrat who campaigned for Obama.
Oh, please. If Ed was a “proper side” republican, then you know you would’ve been defending him.

And the Bundy's was portrayed as typical Democrats so go figure.
So all “typical Democrats” have no class, are hillbilly and homely like, lazy, and dysfunctional?

The ones I've encountered are except when having to work when their welfare runs out.

The ones I've encountered are except when having to work when their welfare runs out.
Such a disgusting stereotype and it’s sad politics like this has to be injected into such a simple thread.

Didn't know if I was injecting politics just an opinion but on with the subject both sides could've put their differences aside and worked to make the show as entertaining as possible such as not making Al into a live action cartoon character, maybe have him and Marcy bury the hatchet in season ten, NO'MAM actually coming out on top, Bud landing a steady job and Kelly reveling that she's not really an idiot but pulling a scam to get out of working.

Didn't know if I was injecting politics just an opinion but on with the subject both sides could've put their differences aside and worked to make the show as entertaining as possible such as not making Al into a live action cartoon character, maybe have him and Marcy bury the hatchet in season ten, NO'MAM actually coming out on top, Bud landing a steady job and Kelly reveling that she's not really an idiot but pulling a scam to get out of working.
I agree with you there.

Oh, please. If Ed was a “proper side” republican, then you know you would’ve been defending him.

But he's a democrat and I defended him anyway. Your comment makes zero sense.

But he's a democrat and I defended him anyway. Your comment makes zero sense. Here was your reply:

I never watched the show but in general in Hollywood, only Republicans have to keep their politics to themselves. If you're not a flaming American-hater-whites-are-racist-gays-are-superior liberal, your next uttered sentence in Hollywood may be your last. Hollywood only celebrates "diversity" if you agree with them politically. And even though may have had different views on gays, Ed O'Neill is a democrat who campaigned for Obama.
How were you defending him? All I got out of that post was you rambling on and bitching about how Republicans are “forced” to keep their views to themselves and how gays get a pass and more stupid sh*t. This shouldn’t be necessary to do, but how you haven’t been banned from the TV show forums is beyond me as it’s the same batsh*t crazy mess every post.

I agree with you there.

Thanks and as for peg she was perfect the way she was other than have her to cook and do some cleaning like in the first season don't mess with perfection.

Thanks and as for peg she was perfect the way she was other than have her to cook and do some cleaning like in the first season don't mess with perfection.
How in HELL does slow Peg not know what a kitchen is in the later seasons when she is clearly seen in there in the early seasons :lol:

Not that fond of the later seasons

Married With Children's Ed O'Neill Opens Up About Where He Thinks Feud With Former Co-Star Amanda Bearse Started (https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/married-childrens-ed-oneill-opens-022558124.html)

I agree with AB. He was rude, nasty, etc. He showed his true personality

Married With Children's Ed O'Neill Opens Up About Where He Thinks Feud With Former Co-Star Amanda Bearse Started (https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/married-childrens-ed-oneill-opens-022558124.html)

Ed O'Neil and Amanda Bearse feud started over a TV Guide cover (https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/married-children-star-ed-oneill-205609486.html)

Actor Ed O'Neill is explaining a stifling on-set feud with his longtime co-star.

O'Neill starred as Al Bundy in the sometimes controversial "Married… with Children" for 11 seasons. "It was also kind of a show that no one wanted to admit that they liked," he told his pal Jesse Tyler Ferguson on his podcast, whom he starred alongside in another 11-season sitcom, "Modern Family."

O'Neill, now 77, reflected on his tenure on the show, admitting his feud with Amanda Bearse was something he regretted. "We didn’t get along, and we did for a long time. We were great friends. And I could guess, I don’t want to speak for her… It started when we got the cover of TV Guide."

O'Neill says Bearse and David Garrison, who played supporting characters Marcy D'Arcy and Steve Rhoades, were not to be featured. "They were told they could not be on the cover. Because they had a rule: there's only so many [that] can be on the cover," he said of TV Guide's restrictions. "Now they violated that for like two shows, I think it was ‘M*A*S*H’ and ‘Dallas,'" he explained.

"That was an exception. They weren’t doing it for us. And we were lucky to get it. It was like the sixth year in or something," he said of the July-August 1989 cover. The show premiered in 1987. "We were thrilled to get the cover of TV Guide. It was big. And Amanda and David came out in unison from their dressing room. We were on the soundstage, and she said, ‘We expect you to go to [co-creator] Ron Leavitt and tell him this doesn’t work. We’re all on the cover.'"

"If I was diplomatic, I should have said, ‘Fine. I’ll talk to him about it,'" O'Neill suggested.

"But instead, I said, ‘No. I’m not doing that. I'm sorry you guys aren't on the cover. I really am! I wish you were! But we can't do anything about it. What do you want me to do, lie to you, and tell you that you know, I'm going to go to bat for you? I'm not,'" he remembered thinking.

"That's my regret," O'Neill told Ferguson, admitting he would have done things differently in retrospect.

A representative for Bearse did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

"Married with Children" wrapped in 1997 after 259 episodes.

Rumors of a reboot or spinoff have floated around Hollywood, but nothing has come to fruition.

WEr-XzgIX_E

Correction: Marcy D'Arcy was her last name in her second marriage not Jefferson. Her last name when married to Steve was Rhoades

Behind the Scenes: CRAZY "Married with Children" FEUD You Need To Hear About!